The effect of temporal masking on alarm call communication in wild superb fairy-wrens

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
You Zhou , Andrew N. Radford , Robert D. Magrath
{"title":"The effect of temporal masking on alarm call communication in wild superb fairy-wrens","authors":"You Zhou ,&nbsp;Andrew N. Radford ,&nbsp;Robert D. Magrath","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.10.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Noise from human activity is a global concern that threatens wildlife, including by disrupting acoustic communication. This disruption appears predominantly caused by masking, where noise makes it difficult to hear acoustic signals. Previous studies have found a strong masking effect when noise and signals occur simultaneously. However, noise can also have a temporal masking effect, meaning that the signal is not detected even if noise occurs before or after the signal (forward and backward masking, respectively). As background noise is often intermittent, temporal masking by natural sounds and anthropogenic noise could pose a significant challenge for animal communication. Surprisingly, although commonly found in humans, temporal masking has been rarely studied in other species. To investigate whether temporal masking affects bird communication in the wild, we conducted a playback experiment on superb fairy-wrens, <em>Malurus cyaneus</em>, using single-element alarm calls before, during and after filtered white noise, as well as a control playback of alarm calls alone. We found that fairy-wrens stopped responding to alarm calls during noise, showing simultaneous masking, but were equally likely to flee if there was noise immediately before or after an alarm call as when there was no noise, suggesting a lack of temporal masking. However, among those fairy-wrens that fled, there was a 20 ms delay in the response to alarm calls after the noise, possibly because of subtle forward masking that delayed call reception. We conclude that temporal masking is unlikely to stop fairy-wrens’ fleeing to alarm calls but might slightly delay call reception. We urge further studies of temporal masking in other species, using various sources of natural and anthropogenic noise, as only then will we know whether temporal masking is of general significance in compromising animal communication.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 122996"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224002872","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Noise from human activity is a global concern that threatens wildlife, including by disrupting acoustic communication. This disruption appears predominantly caused by masking, where noise makes it difficult to hear acoustic signals. Previous studies have found a strong masking effect when noise and signals occur simultaneously. However, noise can also have a temporal masking effect, meaning that the signal is not detected even if noise occurs before or after the signal (forward and backward masking, respectively). As background noise is often intermittent, temporal masking by natural sounds and anthropogenic noise could pose a significant challenge for animal communication. Surprisingly, although commonly found in humans, temporal masking has been rarely studied in other species. To investigate whether temporal masking affects bird communication in the wild, we conducted a playback experiment on superb fairy-wrens, Malurus cyaneus, using single-element alarm calls before, during and after filtered white noise, as well as a control playback of alarm calls alone. We found that fairy-wrens stopped responding to alarm calls during noise, showing simultaneous masking, but were equally likely to flee if there was noise immediately before or after an alarm call as when there was no noise, suggesting a lack of temporal masking. However, among those fairy-wrens that fled, there was a 20 ms delay in the response to alarm calls after the noise, possibly because of subtle forward masking that delayed call reception. We conclude that temporal masking is unlikely to stop fairy-wrens’ fleeing to alarm calls but might slightly delay call reception. We urge further studies of temporal masking in other species, using various sources of natural and anthropogenic noise, as only then will we know whether temporal masking is of general significance in compromising animal communication.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信