Investigating the use of odour and colour foraging cues by rosy-faced lovebirds using deep-learning based analysis

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Winson King Wai Tsang , Emily Shui Kei Poon , Chris Newman , Christina D. Buesching , Simon Yung Wa Sin
{"title":"Investigating the use of odour and colour foraging cues by rosy-faced lovebirds using deep-learning based analysis","authors":"Winson King Wai Tsang ,&nbsp;Emily Shui Kei Poon ,&nbsp;Chris Newman ,&nbsp;Christina D. Buesching ,&nbsp;Simon Yung Wa Sin","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2025.123085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Olfaction and vision can play important roles in optimizing foraging decisions of birds, enabling them to maximize their net rate of energy intake while searching for, handling and consuming food. Parrots have been used extensively in avian cognition research, and some species use olfactory cues to find food. Here we used machine-learning analysis and pose estimation with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to elucidate the relative importance of visual and olfactory cues for informing foraging decisions in the rosy-faced lovebird, <em>Agapornis roseicollis</em>, as a nontypical model species. In a binary choice experiment, we used markerless body pose tracking to analyse bird response behaviours. Rosy-faced lovebirds quickly learnt to discriminate the feeder provisioned with food by forming an association with visual (red/green papers) but not olfactory (banana/almond odour) cues. When visual cues indicated the provisioned and empty feeders, feeder choice was more successful, hesitation time shorter and interest in the empty feeder significantly lower. Our findings reveal that lovebirds can rapidly learn novel visual cues but not olfactory cues, indicating that vision plays a more important role in their learning and foraging decisions than olfaction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50788,"journal":{"name":"Animal Behaviour","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 123085"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347225000120","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Olfaction and vision can play important roles in optimizing foraging decisions of birds, enabling them to maximize their net rate of energy intake while searching for, handling and consuming food. Parrots have been used extensively in avian cognition research, and some species use olfactory cues to find food. Here we used machine-learning analysis and pose estimation with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to elucidate the relative importance of visual and olfactory cues for informing foraging decisions in the rosy-faced lovebird, Agapornis roseicollis, as a nontypical model species. In a binary choice experiment, we used markerless body pose tracking to analyse bird response behaviours. Rosy-faced lovebirds quickly learnt to discriminate the feeder provisioned with food by forming an association with visual (red/green papers) but not olfactory (banana/almond odour) cues. When visual cues indicated the provisioned and empty feeders, feeder choice was more successful, hesitation time shorter and interest in the empty feeder significantly lower. Our findings reveal that lovebirds can rapidly learn novel visual cues but not olfactory cues, indicating that vision plays a more important role in their learning and foraging decisions than olfaction.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behaviour 生物-动物学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.00%
发文量
236
审稿时长
10.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Growing interest in behavioural biology and the international reputation of Animal Behaviour prompted an expansion to monthly publication in 1989. Animal Behaviour continues to be the journal of choice for biologists, ethologists, psychologists, physiologists, and veterinarians with an interest in the subject.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信