Adherence to biosafety and biosecurity protocols: An assessment of biomedical and veterinary laboratories in Benin

Q1 Social Sciences
Philippe Sessou , Nestor Noudeke , Yves Eric Denon , Aretas Tonouhewa , Alban Zohoun , Nassirou Boukary , Désirée Metodakou , Brian Samuelson , Dana Hag Hamed , Jenny Zhao , Sumegha Asthana , Mohammed Abid , Erin M. Sorrell
{"title":"Adherence to biosafety and biosecurity protocols: An assessment of biomedical and veterinary laboratories in Benin","authors":"Philippe Sessou ,&nbsp;Nestor Noudeke ,&nbsp;Yves Eric Denon ,&nbsp;Aretas Tonouhewa ,&nbsp;Alban Zohoun ,&nbsp;Nassirou Boukary ,&nbsp;Désirée Metodakou ,&nbsp;Brian Samuelson ,&nbsp;Dana Hag Hamed ,&nbsp;Jenny Zhao ,&nbsp;Sumegha Asthana ,&nbsp;Mohammed Abid ,&nbsp;Erin M. Sorrell","doi":"10.1016/j.jobb.2024.11.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diagnostic laboratories play a crucial role in surveillance and epidemic preparedness. However, gaps in adherence to biosecurity and biosafety protocols in managing, isolating, storing, and disposing of infectious pathogens in these facilities pose a serious risk to the laboratory, local populations, and the surrounding environment. In this study, we evaluated adherence to biosecurity and biosafety protocols in 96 public and private biomedical and veterinary laboratories in Benin to identify and address such gaps. We followed a cross-sectional study design. We used the Biosafety and Biosecurity in Laboratory Tool to assess biomedical laboratories and the Laboratory Mapping Tool to assess veterinary laboratories. Data were collected using KoBoCollect and analyzed with R software version 4.0.5. Descriptive analysis, the chi-squared test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that most laboratories did not comply with established guidelines. Of all laboratories surveyed, 42% presented a very high risk, 38% a high risk, 15% moderate risk, and 5% were low risk. Overall, 80% of biomedical laboratories and 100% of veterinary laboratories were rated high risk. To improve effective biosecurity practices in laboratories in Benin to an acceptable standard, it is essential to implement robust biosecurity and biosafety policies. Additionally, capacity-building sessions should be conducted for laboratory staff and managers to educate them on the latest biosecurity protocols.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":52875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","volume":"7 1","pages":"Pages 28-37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588933824000621","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic laboratories play a crucial role in surveillance and epidemic preparedness. However, gaps in adherence to biosecurity and biosafety protocols in managing, isolating, storing, and disposing of infectious pathogens in these facilities pose a serious risk to the laboratory, local populations, and the surrounding environment. In this study, we evaluated adherence to biosecurity and biosafety protocols in 96 public and private biomedical and veterinary laboratories in Benin to identify and address such gaps. We followed a cross-sectional study design. We used the Biosafety and Biosecurity in Laboratory Tool to assess biomedical laboratories and the Laboratory Mapping Tool to assess veterinary laboratories. Data were collected using KoBoCollect and analyzed with R software version 4.0.5. Descriptive analysis, the chi-squared test, and logistic regression were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that most laboratories did not comply with established guidelines. Of all laboratories surveyed, 42% presented a very high risk, 38% a high risk, 15% moderate risk, and 5% were low risk. Overall, 80% of biomedical laboratories and 100% of veterinary laboratories were rated high risk. To improve effective biosecurity practices in laboratories in Benin to an acceptable standard, it is essential to implement robust biosecurity and biosafety policies. Additionally, capacity-building sessions should be conducted for laboratory staff and managers to educate them on the latest biosecurity protocols.
遵守生物安全和生物安保议定书:对贝宁生物医学和兽医实验室的评估
诊断实验室在监测和流行病防范方面发挥着关键作用。然而,在这些设施中管理、隔离、储存和处置感染性病原体方面,在遵守生物安全和生物安全规程方面存在差距,这对实验室、当地人群和周围环境构成严重风险。在这项研究中,我们评估了贝宁96个公共和私人生物医学和兽医实验室对生物安全和生物安全协议的遵守情况,以确定和解决这些差距。我们采用了横断面研究设计。我们使用实验室的生物安全和生物安全工具来评估生物医学实验室,使用实验室测绘工具来评估兽医实验室。使用KoBoCollect收集数据,并使用R 4.0.5版软件进行分析。采用描述性分析、卡方检验和logistic回归对数据进行分析。调查结果显示,大多数实验室没有遵守既定的指导方针。在所有被调查的实验室中,42%的实验室存在非常高的风险,38%的实验室存在高风险,15%的实验室存在中等风险,5%的实验室存在低风险。总体而言,80%的生物医学实验室和100%的兽医实验室被评为高风险。为了将贝宁实验室的有效生物安全实践提高到可接受的标准,必须实施强有力的生物安全和生物安全政策。此外,应该为实验室工作人员和管理人员举办能力建设会议,教育他们了解最新的生物安全规程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity
Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
41 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信