Examining the influence of national culture on aviation safety: A systematic review

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Gradiyan Budi Pratama , Carlo Caponecchia
{"title":"Examining the influence of national culture on aviation safety: A systematic review","authors":"Gradiyan Budi Pratama ,&nbsp;Carlo Caponecchia","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Studies have reported that aviation incident rates vary between regions, with Asia and Africa having higher rates than Europe and America. Factors contributing to incidents have also been found to differ between nations. Most features of the aviation system have originated from a Western perspective (North America/Western Europe), which may make them less well adapted to Asian and African cultures. This study was designed to examine the nature and quality of the literature on the relationship between national culture and safety in aviation.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A systematic literature review examining original peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and book chapters published since 2000 was undertaken.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most of the 35 selected articles focused on the impact of national culture on factors affecting safety performance (e.g., human error, crew interaction, communication). Studies of existing databases and survey-based studies were the most common methodologies. The majority of the articles used Hofstede’s dimensions as a lens to analyze national culture. Power distance, individualism, and uncertainty avoidance were the three cultural dimensions most commonly found to influence aviation safety, and were particularly associated with issues in team communication and decision-making. Limited research has examined behavioral markers that could identify the influence of national culture on safety outcomes in specific work settings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>While elements of national culture were considered important for safety, most reviewed studies discussed culture and safety outcomes at a population level rather than at the level of individual incidents.</div></div><div><h3>Practical applications</h3><div>Future studies should focus on a comprehensive identification of behaviors (e.g., communication, teamwork, decision-making) that may be influenced by national culture in specific aviation and transportation operational settings. Existing human factors models and measurement/analysis tools should be evaluated regarding their potential to examine cultural differences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 317-330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524002019","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Studies have reported that aviation incident rates vary between regions, with Asia and Africa having higher rates than Europe and America. Factors contributing to incidents have also been found to differ between nations. Most features of the aviation system have originated from a Western perspective (North America/Western Europe), which may make them less well adapted to Asian and African cultures. This study was designed to examine the nature and quality of the literature on the relationship between national culture and safety in aviation.

Method

A systematic literature review examining original peer-reviewed journal articles, conference papers, and book chapters published since 2000 was undertaken.

Results

Most of the 35 selected articles focused on the impact of national culture on factors affecting safety performance (e.g., human error, crew interaction, communication). Studies of existing databases and survey-based studies were the most common methodologies. The majority of the articles used Hofstede’s dimensions as a lens to analyze national culture. Power distance, individualism, and uncertainty avoidance were the three cultural dimensions most commonly found to influence aviation safety, and were particularly associated with issues in team communication and decision-making. Limited research has examined behavioral markers that could identify the influence of national culture on safety outcomes in specific work settings.

Conclusions

While elements of national culture were considered important for safety, most reviewed studies discussed culture and safety outcomes at a population level rather than at the level of individual incidents.

Practical applications

Future studies should focus on a comprehensive identification of behaviors (e.g., communication, teamwork, decision-making) that may be influenced by national culture in specific aviation and transportation operational settings. Existing human factors models and measurement/analysis tools should be evaluated regarding their potential to examine cultural differences.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信