Nickson Severian Kahigi , Josephine Joseph Mkunda , Mwema Felix Mwema , Revocatus Machunda
{"title":"A comprehensive life cycle assessment of sisal yarn production: Unveiling sustainability and resource optimization hotspots","authors":"Nickson Severian Kahigi , Josephine Joseph Mkunda , Mwema Felix Mwema , Revocatus Machunda","doi":"10.1016/j.envc.2025.101085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of sisal yarn production, covering key phases such as cultivation, transportation, decortication, brushing, baling, and yarn making to assess the environmental impacts associated with the production of 1 kg of sisal yarn. The results show that cultivation contributes the most to global warming potential (7.29 kg CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> eq, <span><math><mo>≈</mo></math></span>51% of total emissions) and terrestrial ecotoxicity (112.02 kg 14-DCB eq, 97.7%), driven largely by the excessive use of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. Decortication contributes significantly to marine eutrophication (83.7% of total impacts) and global warming (5.52 kg CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> eq, <span><math><mo>≈</mo></math></span>40%). Although yarn making accounts for a smaller share of the global warming potential (0.97 kg CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> eq, 6.8%), it has a notable impact on human toxicity (contributing 21.7% to non-carcinogenic toxicity) and fossil fuel depletion (305.8 g oil eq, 10% of the total). A sensitivity analysis indicates that reducing chemical inputs, improving energy efficiency, and optimizing water use can reduce environmental impacts by up to 30%, lowering global warming potential to 11.59 kg CO<span><math><msub><mrow></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></math></span> eq in the improvement scenario. These results align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on responsible production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13), and life on land (SDG 15), positioning sisal yarn as a sustainable alternative to synthetic fibers. Future research should focus on incorporating renewable energy, expanding region-specific LCA inventories, and exploring social and economic sustainability to further enhance the sisal value chain’s sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34794,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Challenges","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 101085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266701002500006X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of sisal yarn production, covering key phases such as cultivation, transportation, decortication, brushing, baling, and yarn making to assess the environmental impacts associated with the production of 1 kg of sisal yarn. The results show that cultivation contributes the most to global warming potential (7.29 kg CO eq, 51% of total emissions) and terrestrial ecotoxicity (112.02 kg 14-DCB eq, 97.7%), driven largely by the excessive use of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers. Decortication contributes significantly to marine eutrophication (83.7% of total impacts) and global warming (5.52 kg CO eq, 40%). Although yarn making accounts for a smaller share of the global warming potential (0.97 kg CO eq, 6.8%), it has a notable impact on human toxicity (contributing 21.7% to non-carcinogenic toxicity) and fossil fuel depletion (305.8 g oil eq, 10% of the total). A sensitivity analysis indicates that reducing chemical inputs, improving energy efficiency, and optimizing water use can reduce environmental impacts by up to 30%, lowering global warming potential to 11.59 kg CO eq in the improvement scenario. These results align with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on responsible production (SDG 12), climate action (SDG 13), and life on land (SDG 15), positioning sisal yarn as a sustainable alternative to synthetic fibers. Future research should focus on incorporating renewable energy, expanding region-specific LCA inventories, and exploring social and economic sustainability to further enhance the sisal value chain’s sustainability.
本研究提出了剑麻纱线生产的综合生命周期评估(LCA),涵盖了种植、运输、去皮、刷毛、打捆和制纱等关键阶段,以评估生产1公斤剑麻纱线对环境的影响。结果表明,由于过度使用农药、除草剂和化肥,种植对全球变暖潜势(7.29 kg CO2当量,约占总排放量的51%)和陆地生态毒性(112.02 kg 14-DCB当量,占97.7%)的贡献最大。脱屑对海洋富营养化(占总影响的83.7%)和全球变暖(5.52 kg CO2当量,≈40%)有显著贡献。虽然纱线制造在全球变暖潜力中所占的份额较小(0.97千克二氧化碳当量,6.8%),但它对人类毒性(占非致癌毒性的21.7%)和化石燃料消耗(305.8克石油当量,占总量的10%)有显著影响。敏感度分析表明,减少化学品投入、提高能源效率和优化用水可以减少高达30%的环境影响,在改善情景中将全球变暖潜势降低到11.59 kg CO2当量。这些结果符合可持续发展目标(SDG)关于负责任生产(SDG 12)、气候行动(SDG 13)和陆地生命(SDG 15)的目标,将剑麻纱定位为合成纤维的可持续替代品。未来的研究应侧重于纳入可再生能源,扩大区域LCA清单,并探索社会和经济可持续性,以进一步提高剑麻价值链的可持续性。