How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Zhe-Yi Chen , Lu-Tao Zhao , Lei Cheng , Rui-Xiang Qiu
{"title":"How does China respond to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism? An approach of global trade analysis","authors":"Zhe-Yi Chen ,&nbsp;Lu-Tao Zhao ,&nbsp;Lei Cheng ,&nbsp;Rui-Xiang Qiu","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has sparked widespread debate recently. As a major trading partner of the European Union, China may be significantly affected by CBAM. Therefore, evaluating the impacts of CBAM and formulating corresponding solutions is significant for China to meet its emission reduction targets and sustain economic growth. Based on the computable general equilibrium framework, we evaluate the environmental and economic consequences of CBAM from a global trade perspective, with a particular focus on its impact on China. Furthermore, we explore a potential response policy by considering whether the adverse impacts of CBAM can be offset through enhanced international cooperation and exchange in low-carbon technologies. The findings reveal that although CBAM may partially curtail international carbon leakage, its contribution to worldwide emission reductions is limited. Specifically, the CBAM's effect on China is disproportionate, resulting in a welfare cost of 231 million USD for a mere 4.39 Mt emissions reduction. In contrast, the dissemination of innovative technologies through Sino-European climate partnerships could foster a more mutually beneficial outcome. It is the critical importance of climate fairness and reciprocity in the formulation of future climate policies, and unilateral approaches to global climate governance may not deliver the intended results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 114486"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524005068","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) has sparked widespread debate recently. As a major trading partner of the European Union, China may be significantly affected by CBAM. Therefore, evaluating the impacts of CBAM and formulating corresponding solutions is significant for China to meet its emission reduction targets and sustain economic growth. Based on the computable general equilibrium framework, we evaluate the environmental and economic consequences of CBAM from a global trade perspective, with a particular focus on its impact on China. Furthermore, we explore a potential response policy by considering whether the adverse impacts of CBAM can be offset through enhanced international cooperation and exchange in low-carbon technologies. The findings reveal that although CBAM may partially curtail international carbon leakage, its contribution to worldwide emission reductions is limited. Specifically, the CBAM's effect on China is disproportionate, resulting in a welfare cost of 231 million USD for a mere 4.39 Mt emissions reduction. In contrast, the dissemination of innovative technologies through Sino-European climate partnerships could foster a more mutually beneficial outcome. It is the critical importance of climate fairness and reciprocity in the formulation of future climate policies, and unilateral approaches to global climate governance may not deliver the intended results.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信