Fuel efficiency, power trading, and emissions leakage from driving electric vehicles: Evidence from Chinese provinces

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Feng Wei , W.D. Walls , Xiaoli Zheng
{"title":"Fuel efficiency, power trading, and emissions leakage from driving electric vehicles: Evidence from Chinese provinces","authors":"Feng Wei ,&nbsp;W.D. Walls ,&nbsp;Xiaoli Zheng","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates how driving electric vehicles redistributes tailpipe emissions and brings unintended impacts elsewhere. Using vehicle registration and electricity transmission data in China, we decompose emissions reductions of adopting an electric vehicle into three distinct effects: fuel efficiency, power trading, and emissions leakage. The fuel efficiency effect, arising from the higher energy conversion rates of electric vehicles relative to gasoline vehicles, accounts for most emissions reductions by electric vehicle adoption. The power trading effect, referring to emissions exported by outsourcing power generation used to charge electric vehicles, constitutes only a small portion of emissions reductions. The power trading effect is nearly offset by the leakage effect—the emissions increases borne by other regions, implying little nationwide gain from shifting charging power across regions. Overall, some provinces incur losses by net emissions increases, though most benefit from electric vehicle adoption. The losing provinces capture proportionally fewer benefits from local small-scale electric vehicle adoption but absorb disproportionately more emissions by supplying power used for electric vehicle charging in other areas. We show that investing in renewable power generation should be prioritized to mitigate the inequality of emissions reductions across regions in the middle and late stages of electric vehicle transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 114473"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524004932","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates how driving electric vehicles redistributes tailpipe emissions and brings unintended impacts elsewhere. Using vehicle registration and electricity transmission data in China, we decompose emissions reductions of adopting an electric vehicle into three distinct effects: fuel efficiency, power trading, and emissions leakage. The fuel efficiency effect, arising from the higher energy conversion rates of electric vehicles relative to gasoline vehicles, accounts for most emissions reductions by electric vehicle adoption. The power trading effect, referring to emissions exported by outsourcing power generation used to charge electric vehicles, constitutes only a small portion of emissions reductions. The power trading effect is nearly offset by the leakage effect—the emissions increases borne by other regions, implying little nationwide gain from shifting charging power across regions. Overall, some provinces incur losses by net emissions increases, though most benefit from electric vehicle adoption. The losing provinces capture proportionally fewer benefits from local small-scale electric vehicle adoption but absorb disproportionately more emissions by supplying power used for electric vehicle charging in other areas. We show that investing in renewable power generation should be prioritized to mitigate the inequality of emissions reductions across regions in the middle and late stages of electric vehicle transition.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信