The investigation of nonlinear variability underlying postural control in the injure-limb in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES

Gait & posture Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.024

Yuki A. Sugimoto , Patrick O. McKeon , Christopher K. Rhea , Carl G. Mattacola , Scott E. Ross

{"title":"The investigation of nonlinear variability underlying postural control in the injure-limb in individuals with and without chronic ankle instability","authors":"Yuki A. Sugimoto , Patrick O. McKeon , Christopher K. Rhea , Carl G. Mattacola , Scott E. Ross","doi":"10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Less flexible and adaptable sensorimotor systems associated with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) limit the detection of relevant sensory feedback information, resulting in decreased movement variability. Consequently, when faced with challenging environmental constraints, particularly with conditions that manipulate sensory feedback, individuals with CAI may become more prone to repetitive ankle sprains. This study aimed to investigate the neural control underlying postural control in the injured-limb during increased environmental constraints with sensory feedback manipulations in individuals with and without CAI, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Forty-two individuals with and without CAI participated in the study and completed the sensory organization test (SOT). The SOT assesses the ability to integrate primary sensory feedback across six conditions that manipulate somatosensory and visual feedback with a combination of a sway-referenced support surface and visual surroundings. The nonlinear method of sample entropy (SampEN) was used to quantify the neural control underlying postural control. A one-way ANOVA examined group differences in neural control during the SOT conditions while standing on the injured-limb.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Individuals with CAI demonstrated significantly lower SampEN while maintaining posture in conditions where they were forced to rely exclusively on vestibular feedback in the injured-limb compared to healthy controls (P < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Individuals with CAI did not demonstrate decreased movement variability (neural control) in most of the six SOT conditions. However, the CAI group exhibited decreased movement variability, specifically when they had to rely on vestibular feedback while maintaining posture in the injured-limb compared to healthy controls. Future studies should investigate how manipulation of vestibular feedback affects movement variability with gait in individuals with CAI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12496,"journal":{"name":"Gait & posture","volume":"118 ","pages":"Pages 69-74"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gait & posture","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966636225000244","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Less flexible and adaptable sensorimotor systems associated with Chronic Ankle Instability (CAI) limit the detection of relevant sensory feedback information, resulting in decreased movement variability. Consequently, when faced with challenging environmental constraints, particularly with conditions that manipulate sensory feedback, individuals with CAI may become more prone to repetitive ankle sprains. This study aimed to investigate the neural control underlying postural control in the injured-limb during increased environmental constraints with sensory feedback manipulations in individuals with and without CAI, respectively.

Methods

Forty-two individuals with and without CAI participated in the study and completed the sensory organization test (SOT). The SOT assesses the ability to integrate primary sensory feedback across six conditions that manipulate somatosensory and visual feedback with a combination of a sway-referenced support surface and visual surroundings. The nonlinear method of sample entropy (SampEN) was used to quantify the neural control underlying postural control. A one-way ANOVA examined group differences in neural control during the SOT conditions while standing on the injured-limb.

Results

Individuals with CAI demonstrated significantly lower SampEN while maintaining posture in conditions where they were forced to rely exclusively on vestibular feedback in the injured-limb compared to healthy controls (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Individuals with CAI did not demonstrate decreased movement variability (neural control) in most of the six SOT conditions. However, the CAI group exhibited decreased movement variability, specifically when they had to rely on vestibular feedback while maintaining posture in the injured-limb compared to healthy controls. Future studies should investigate how manipulation of vestibular feedback affects movement variability with gait in individuals with CAI.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Gait & posture 医学-神经科学

CiteScore

4.70

自引率

12.50%

发文量

616

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Gait & Posture is a vehicle for the publication of up-to-date basic and clinical research on all aspects of locomotion and balance. The topics covered include: Techniques for the measurement of gait and posture, and the standardization of results presentation; Studies of normal and pathological gait; Treatment of gait and postural abnormalities; Biomechanical and theoretical approaches to gait and posture; Mathematical models of joint and muscle mechanics; Neurological and musculoskeletal function in gait and posture; The evolution of upright posture and bipedal locomotion; Adaptations of carrying loads, walking on uneven surfaces, climbing stairs etc; spinal biomechanics only if they are directly related to gait and/or posture and are of general interest to our readers; The effect of aging and development on gait and posture; Psychological and cultural aspects of gait; Patient education.