The impact of front-of-package design features on consumers' attention and selection likelihood of protein bars: An eye-tracking study

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Erin Applegate , Julia Carins , Lisa Vincze , Matthew Stainer , Christopher Irwin
{"title":"The impact of front-of-package design features on consumers' attention and selection likelihood of protein bars: An eye-tracking study","authors":"Erin Applegate ,&nbsp;Julia Carins ,&nbsp;Lisa Vincze ,&nbsp;Matthew Stainer ,&nbsp;Christopher Irwin","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current regulatory framework permits sports food manufacturers to incorporate a variety of voluntary label claims/icons on the front-of-package (FoP) of their products. This study examined the influence of label design features relevant to protein bars on individuals' visual attention and selection likelihood. Eight experimental FoP labels were created, concentrating on three distinct features, each identified as an area of interest (AOI). These features were allocated in a dichotomous manner within a 2 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 2 <span><math><mo>×</mo></math></span> 2 design: AOI 1 = ‘high protein’ vs ‘sports bar’; AOI 2 = ‘10 g protein/serve’ vs ‘25 g protein/serve’; AOI 3 = ‘dietitian approved’ vs ‘sports celebrity’. Labels were presented in a semi-randomised order and viewed individually for 15 s by participants. Eye-tracking metrics included time to first fixation (TFF), total fixation duration (TFD), fixation count (FC), and visit count (VC). Selection likelihood ratings were captured using visual analogue scales (0–100 mm). Despite receiving the least amount of attention, protein content was most influential on participants' selection likelihood ratings. Participants were more likely to select products displaying ‘25 g protein/serve’ than ‘10 g protein/serve’. These results provide insight into FoP label elements that influence consumers' willingness to select protein bars and may help guide label design enhancements to attract consumer attention and better cater to their preferences.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105427"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325000023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current regulatory framework permits sports food manufacturers to incorporate a variety of voluntary label claims/icons on the front-of-package (FoP) of their products. This study examined the influence of label design features relevant to protein bars on individuals' visual attention and selection likelihood. Eight experimental FoP labels were created, concentrating on three distinct features, each identified as an area of interest (AOI). These features were allocated in a dichotomous manner within a 2 × 2 × 2 design: AOI 1 = ‘high protein’ vs ‘sports bar’; AOI 2 = ‘10 g protein/serve’ vs ‘25 g protein/serve’; AOI 3 = ‘dietitian approved’ vs ‘sports celebrity’. Labels were presented in a semi-randomised order and viewed individually for 15 s by participants. Eye-tracking metrics included time to first fixation (TFF), total fixation duration (TFD), fixation count (FC), and visit count (VC). Selection likelihood ratings were captured using visual analogue scales (0–100 mm). Despite receiving the least amount of attention, protein content was most influential on participants' selection likelihood ratings. Participants were more likely to select products displaying ‘25 g protein/serve’ than ‘10 g protein/serve’. These results provide insight into FoP label elements that influence consumers' willingness to select protein bars and may help guide label design enhancements to attract consumer attention and better cater to their preferences.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信