{"title":"An early prediction model on systemic risk under global risk: Using FinBERT and temporal fusion transformer to multimodal data fusion framework","authors":"Xiao Jin , Shu-Ling Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Several United States banks went bankrupt in 2023, and the total scale exceeded the subprime 2008 mortgage crisis. Thus, determining how to better predict banks’ systemic risks is crucial. While past research used quantitative data and statistical methods, rarely incorporated qualitative data, and lacked research exploring the impact of public confidence on systemic risk.</div><div>This study examined 445,500 daily multimodal quantitative and qualitative data to analyze financial news. We obtained data on public confidence through finance bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (hereafter FinBERT) to explore the relationship between public confidence and systemic risk through temporal fusion transformers (TFTs). We established an early prediction model that predicts the next 5 and 20 days, achieving more accurate prediction performance than <em>linear regression</em>, <em>LSTM</em> (long short-term memory), and <em>XGB</em> (eXtreme gradient boosting).</div><div>Based on the model that uses the past 20 days to predict the next five days, we found that positive and negative public confidence had a greater impact on systemic risk. In comparison, neutral public confidence had a lesser effect. Macro data such as carbon dioxide emissions also impact systemic risk. By expanding the time range to 60 days to predict 20 days, we found that the most significant impact on systemic risk factors was month, negative public information, interest rate, quasi-leverage, and the GDP growth rate.</div><div>The findings indicate that public confidence deserves more attention than macro variables in preventing systemic risks in the banking industry. Negative public confidence significantly affects systemic risk, echoing the adage that <em>Bad news has wings</em>.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102361"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000014","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Several United States banks went bankrupt in 2023, and the total scale exceeded the subprime 2008 mortgage crisis. Thus, determining how to better predict banks’ systemic risks is crucial. While past research used quantitative data and statistical methods, rarely incorporated qualitative data, and lacked research exploring the impact of public confidence on systemic risk.
This study examined 445,500 daily multimodal quantitative and qualitative data to analyze financial news. We obtained data on public confidence through finance bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (hereafter FinBERT) to explore the relationship between public confidence and systemic risk through temporal fusion transformers (TFTs). We established an early prediction model that predicts the next 5 and 20 days, achieving more accurate prediction performance than linear regression, LSTM (long short-term memory), and XGB (eXtreme gradient boosting).
Based on the model that uses the past 20 days to predict the next five days, we found that positive and negative public confidence had a greater impact on systemic risk. In comparison, neutral public confidence had a lesser effect. Macro data such as carbon dioxide emissions also impact systemic risk. By expanding the time range to 60 days to predict 20 days, we found that the most significant impact on systemic risk factors was month, negative public information, interest rate, quasi-leverage, and the GDP growth rate.
The findings indicate that public confidence deserves more attention than macro variables in preventing systemic risks in the banking industry. Negative public confidence significantly affects systemic risk, echoing the adage that Bad news has wings.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.