Enabled to eat more plant proteins? Capabilities, opportunities, and motivations related to increasing pulse and pulse-based product consumption across consumer groups

IF 4.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Sini Kuosmanen , Kirsi Korhonen , Anne-Maria Pajari , Hanna Konttinen
{"title":"Enabled to eat more plant proteins? Capabilities, opportunities, and motivations related to increasing pulse and pulse-based product consumption across consumer groups","authors":"Sini Kuosmanen ,&nbsp;Kirsi Korhonen ,&nbsp;Anne-Maria Pajari ,&nbsp;Hanna Konttinen","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Replacing even part of dietary red meat with plant proteins, such as pulses, is associated with better environmental and human health. Despite this, meat consumption is still popular while plant proteins are underconsumed in the Western world, especially among certain consumer groups. In this paper, our objective was to examine to what extent 15 different enablers would advance the consumption of pulses and pulse-based products (PBPs) across different genders, age groups, education levels, perceived financial situations, and red meat-eating frequencies. A survey was conducted among Finnish adults aged 18–75 years (<em>n</em> = 1000). The main analysis technique was multivariable linear regression. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM<img>B) model was applied in discussing the results. The most important enablers for increasing pulse and PBP consumption were better taste, lower price, and having recipes and ideas for use provided, which represent motivation, opportunity, and capability in the COM-B model. In general, women, the young, and respondents with less frequent red meat consumption perceived the enablers could increase their pulse and PBP consumption more than men, older respondents, and those with frequent red meat consumption. Additionally, the effects of age, financial situation, and red meat consumption frequency on the perceived importance of some of the enablers varied between women and men. Taken together, consumer groups differed in the importance of all three COM-B elements. These results can be used to promote plant-based eating among different consumer groups and allow the design of increasingly targeted interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 105388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329324002908","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Replacing even part of dietary red meat with plant proteins, such as pulses, is associated with better environmental and human health. Despite this, meat consumption is still popular while plant proteins are underconsumed in the Western world, especially among certain consumer groups. In this paper, our objective was to examine to what extent 15 different enablers would advance the consumption of pulses and pulse-based products (PBPs) across different genders, age groups, education levels, perceived financial situations, and red meat-eating frequencies. A survey was conducted among Finnish adults aged 18–75 years (n = 1000). The main analysis technique was multivariable linear regression. The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COMB) model was applied in discussing the results. The most important enablers for increasing pulse and PBP consumption were better taste, lower price, and having recipes and ideas for use provided, which represent motivation, opportunity, and capability in the COM-B model. In general, women, the young, and respondents with less frequent red meat consumption perceived the enablers could increase their pulse and PBP consumption more than men, older respondents, and those with frequent red meat consumption. Additionally, the effects of age, financial situation, and red meat consumption frequency on the perceived importance of some of the enablers varied between women and men. Taken together, consumer groups differed in the importance of all three COM-B elements. These results can be used to promote plant-based eating among different consumer groups and allow the design of increasingly targeted interventions.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Food Quality and Preference
Food Quality and Preference 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
15.10%
发文量
263
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信