Willow short rotation coppice. Energy and environmental assessment

IF 6.1 Q2 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Stelian Alexandru Borz , Salvatore Papandrea , Michele Zoli , Jacopo Bacenetti , Andrea Rosario Proto
{"title":"Willow short rotation coppice. Energy and environmental assessment","authors":"Stelian Alexandru Borz ,&nbsp;Salvatore Papandrea ,&nbsp;Michele Zoli ,&nbsp;Jacopo Bacenetti ,&nbsp;Andrea Rosario Proto","doi":"10.1016/j.cesys.2024.100249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Wood chip production from short-rotation coppice (SRC) can be an interesting opportunity for farmers and for the environment. SRC cultivation in fertile arable land, with full mechanisation of the operations, results in higher yields. However, the establishment of SRC is more rational in marginal areas where the conventional crops cannot provide suitable results. In this context, the mechanisation of SRC plays a relevant role, and the availability of small machinery is a key element.</div><div>In this study, two different willow SRC management regimes, characterised by the adoption of small mechanisation solutions for crop management and harvesting, were compared. The life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied considering 1 cubic metre of wood chips as the functional unit (FU) and a ‘from cradle to gate’ perspective regarding the system boundary. Primary data were directly collected via field trials and interviews with the farmers.</div><div>The results highlighted how the mechanisation of different field operations is the main cause of environmental impact, which is primarily due to the felling and chipping of stems. The 3-year SRC harvesting regime, despite lower productivity, presents better environmental performance compared to the 2-year one for all the evaluated impact categories, owing to a reduction of the environmental impact related to harvesting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34616,"journal":{"name":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100249"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleaner Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666789424000874","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wood chip production from short-rotation coppice (SRC) can be an interesting opportunity for farmers and for the environment. SRC cultivation in fertile arable land, with full mechanisation of the operations, results in higher yields. However, the establishment of SRC is more rational in marginal areas where the conventional crops cannot provide suitable results. In this context, the mechanisation of SRC plays a relevant role, and the availability of small machinery is a key element.
In this study, two different willow SRC management regimes, characterised by the adoption of small mechanisation solutions for crop management and harvesting, were compared. The life cycle assessment (LCA) was applied considering 1 cubic metre of wood chips as the functional unit (FU) and a ‘from cradle to gate’ perspective regarding the system boundary. Primary data were directly collected via field trials and interviews with the farmers.
The results highlighted how the mechanisation of different field operations is the main cause of environmental impact, which is primarily due to the felling and chipping of stems. The 3-year SRC harvesting regime, despite lower productivity, presents better environmental performance compared to the 2-year one for all the evaluated impact categories, owing to a reduction of the environmental impact related to harvesting.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleaner Environmental Systems
Cleaner Environmental Systems Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信