Impact of surgical treatment on neonatal management in extremely low birth weight infants: Single-center retrospective study

Seiichiro Inoue, Yuki Muta, Yuta Takeuchi, Kohei Kawaguchi, Akio Odaka
{"title":"Impact of surgical treatment on neonatal management in extremely low birth weight infants: Single-center retrospective study","authors":"Seiichiro Inoue,&nbsp;Yuki Muta,&nbsp;Yuta Takeuchi,&nbsp;Kohei Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Akio Odaka","doi":"10.1016/j.gpeds.2024.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few studies have examined the details of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (i.e., infants with a birth weight &lt; 1000 g) on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) who require surgical treatment. Therefore, we analyzed mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables in ELBW infants who received surgical treatments at our center from 2009 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All ELBW infants were included who received surgical treatment at our NICU from January 2009 to December 2022. We compared data from infants treated in the early (2009–2015) and late (2016–2022) periods and investigated trends in mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 678 ELBW infants were admitted and cared at our neonatal center and 56 ELBW infants were received surgical treatment. The number of patients who received surgical treatment increased in the late period (10.4 % (36/345)) compared to the early period (6.33 % (20/316)) (early vs late period: <em>p</em> = 0.0398). The indications for surgery were expanded in late period compared to early periods. In the late period, the survival rate was higher (63.5 vs 75.0 %: early vs late period). No statistical difference was observed between the early and late period in the duration of the NICU stay. However, the duration of NICU stay in died patients were shorter compared to the survived patients (median (lower -upper quartiles):196.5 (166.75–261.25 vs 75.0 (49.0–183.5): early vs late period). The total number of surgical treatments which each patient received were higher in survived cases (median (lower -upper quartiles): 2.0 (2.0–4.0) vs 1.0 (1.0–2.0): survived vs died cases: <em>p</em> = 0.013).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recent advances in NICU care have expanded the indications for surgical treatment in ELBW infants. Survival rates appear to have improved. In more recent years, patients have increasingly undergone multi-step surgical treatment, which we consider to be a result of the improved the systemic status of infants in perioperative period.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>3</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73173,"journal":{"name":"Global pediatrics","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700972400109X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Few studies have examined the details of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (i.e., infants with a birth weight < 1000 g) on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) who require surgical treatment. Therefore, we analyzed mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables in ELBW infants who received surgical treatments at our center from 2009 to 2022.

Methods

All ELBW infants were included who received surgical treatment at our NICU from January 2009 to December 2022. We compared data from infants treated in the early (2009–2015) and late (2016–2022) periods and investigated trends in mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables.

Results

A total of 678 ELBW infants were admitted and cared at our neonatal center and 56 ELBW infants were received surgical treatment. The number of patients who received surgical treatment increased in the late period (10.4 % (36/345)) compared to the early period (6.33 % (20/316)) (early vs late period: p = 0.0398). The indications for surgery were expanded in late period compared to early periods. In the late period, the survival rate was higher (63.5 vs 75.0 %: early vs late period). No statistical difference was observed between the early and late period in the duration of the NICU stay. However, the duration of NICU stay in died patients were shorter compared to the survived patients (median (lower -upper quartiles):196.5 (166.75–261.25 vs 75.0 (49.0–183.5): early vs late period). The total number of surgical treatments which each patient received were higher in survived cases (median (lower -upper quartiles): 2.0 (2.0–4.0) vs 1.0 (1.0–2.0): survived vs died cases: p = 0.013).

Conclusions

Recent advances in NICU care have expanded the indications for surgical treatment in ELBW infants. Survival rates appear to have improved. In more recent years, patients have increasingly undergone multi-step surgical treatment, which we consider to be a result of the improved the systemic status of infants in perioperative period.

Level of evidence

3
手术治疗对极低出生体重儿新生儿管理的影响:单中心回顾性研究
背景:很少有研究调查过极低出生体重儿(即出生体重低于1 / 4的婴儿)的细节。需要手术治疗的新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)。因此,我们分析了2009年至2022年在我们中心接受手术治疗的ELBW婴儿的死亡率、发病率和临床变量。方法选取2009年1月至2022年12月在我院新生儿重症监护病房接受手术治疗的所有ELBW婴儿。我们比较了早期(2009-2015年)和晚期(2016-2022年)接受治疗的婴儿的数据,并调查了死亡率、发病率和临床变量的趋势。结果我院新生儿中心共收治ELBW患儿678例,手术治疗56例。晚期接受手术治疗的患者数量(10.4%(36/345))比早期(6.33%(20/316))增加(早期与晚期:p = 0.0398)。晚期手术适应证较早期扩大。晚期生存率较高(63.5% vs 75.0%:早期vs晚期)。新生儿重症监护病房住院时间的早期和晚期无统计学差异。然而,与存活患者相比,死亡患者的NICU住院时间较短(中位数(上下四分位数):196.5 (166.75-261.25 vs 75.0(49.0-183.5):早期vs晚期)。每位患者接受手术治疗的总次数在存活病例中较高(中位数(上下四分位数):2.0 (2.0 - 4.0)vs 1.0(1.0 - 2.0);存活病例vs死亡病例:p = 0.013)。结论新生儿重症监护室护理的最新进展扩大了ELBW婴儿手术治疗的适应证。存活率似乎有所提高。近年来,越来越多的患者接受多步手术治疗,我们认为这是围手术期婴儿全身状况改善的结果。证据水平3
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global pediatrics
Global pediatrics Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信