Work-related violence interventions in the disability sector: A systematic review and systems mapping exercise

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Olivia Miller , Olivia Dobson , Tristan Casey , Sharon Newnam
{"title":"Work-related violence interventions in the disability sector: A systematic review and systems mapping exercise","authors":"Olivia Miller ,&nbsp;Olivia Dobson ,&nbsp;Tristan Casey ,&nbsp;Sharon Newnam","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Violence against staff is common in the healthcare sector, as are staff training interventions aiming to reduce work-related violence (WRV). However, limited research has explored the breadth of WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector using a systems thinking framework, PreventiMap, which is an adaption of Rasmussen’s Risk Management framework. The goal of this research was to identify opportunities to support systemic change in the sector to support the safety of workers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a comprehensive search strategy and eligibility criteria were applied across five databases. After screening, a total of 22 intervention studies were included for systematic review. Included studies were synthesised narratively and using the systems thinking PreventiMap technique. The efficacy of interventions was variable, as was the methodological quality of included studies. Most intervention studies (<em>n</em> = 20, 90.1 %) explored staff training, with very few (<em>n</em> = 4, 18.2 %) exploring management or company level WRV interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that organizations implement more holistic WRV interventions that address higher system levels and evaluate their effectiveness using more rigorous designs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106765"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Violence against staff is common in the healthcare sector, as are staff training interventions aiming to reduce work-related violence (WRV). However, limited research has explored the breadth of WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector. Therefore, the current study aimed to systematically review WRV interventions for staff working in the disability sector using a systems thinking framework, PreventiMap, which is an adaption of Rasmussen’s Risk Management framework. The goal of this research was to identify opportunities to support systemic change in the sector to support the safety of workers. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses approach, a comprehensive search strategy and eligibility criteria were applied across five databases. After screening, a total of 22 intervention studies were included for systematic review. Included studies were synthesised narratively and using the systems thinking PreventiMap technique. The efficacy of interventions was variable, as was the methodological quality of included studies. Most intervention studies (n = 20, 90.1 %) explored staff training, with very few (n = 4, 18.2 %) exploring management or company level WRV interventions. Therefore, it is recommended that organizations implement more holistic WRV interventions that address higher system levels and evaluate their effectiveness using more rigorous designs.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信