Advancing occupational and system safety in Industry 5.0: Effective HAZID, risk analysis frameworks, and human-AI interaction management

IF 4.7 1区工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL

Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106770

Kamran Gholamizadeh , Esmaeil Zarei , Luca Gualtieri , Matteo De Marchi

{"title":"Advancing occupational and system safety in Industry 5.0: Effective HAZID, risk analysis frameworks, and human-AI interaction management","authors":"Kamran Gholamizadeh , Esmaeil Zarei , Luca Gualtieri , Matteo De Marchi","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Industry 5.0 evolves, this study addresses critical aspects of system and occupational safety through hazard identification (HAZID), risk analysis, and the interaction between humans and artificial intelligence (HI and AI). This review investigates existing literature to answer three key research questions: (1) How is HAZID conducted to meet the safety demands of Industry 5.0? (2) What constitutes an effective risk analysis framework for this era? (3) How can conflicts between HI and AI be managed to enhance system reliability? The findings demonstrate that AI-driven approaches significantly improve HAZID processes and underscore the necessity of tailored risk analysis frameworks for effective safety management. Additionally, strategies to mitigate HI-AI conflicts are discussed, highlighting the importance of policies that foster decision-making and reliability in human-AI collaboration. The study concludes with practical recommendations for advancing safety management in complex socio-technical systems within Industry 5.0.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106770"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Industry 5.0 evolves, this study addresses critical aspects of system and occupational safety through hazard identification (HAZID), risk analysis, and the interaction between humans and artificial intelligence (HI and AI). This review investigates existing literature to answer three key research questions: (1) How is HAZID conducted to meet the safety demands of Industry 5.0? (2) What constitutes an effective risk analysis framework for this era? (3) How can conflicts between HI and AI be managed to enhance system reliability? The findings demonstrate that AI-driven approaches significantly improve HAZID processes and underscore the necessity of tailored risk analysis frameworks for effective safety management. Additionally, strategies to mitigate HI-AI conflicts are discussed, highlighting the importance of policies that foster decision-making and reliability in human-AI collaboration. The study concludes with practical recommendations for advancing safety management in complex socio-technical systems within Industry 5.0.

查看原文本刊更多论文

推进工业5.0中的职业和系统安全：有效的HAZID、风险分析框架和人机交互管理

随着工业5.0的发展，本研究通过危害识别（HAZID）、风险分析以及人类与人工智能（HI和AI）之间的相互作用，解决了系统和职业安全的关键方面。本文通过对已有文献的梳理，回答了三个关键的研究问题：(1)如何实施HAZID以满足工业5.0的安全要求？(2)什么构成了这个时代有效的风险分析框架？(3)如何管理人机交互和人工智能之间的冲突以提高系统可靠性？研究结果表明，人工智能驱动的方法显著改善了HAZID流程，并强调了为有效的安全管理量身定制风险分析框架的必要性。此外，本文还讨论了缓解HI-AI冲突的策略，强调了促进人类- ai协作决策和可靠性的政策的重要性。该研究最后提出了在工业5.0中推进复杂社会技术系统安全管理的实用建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Safety Science 管理科学-工程：工业

CiteScore

13.00

自引率

9.80%

发文量

335

审稿时长

53 days

期刊介绍： Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.