Impact of a biological anti-mycotoxin feed additive on aflatoxin milk transfer, performance, and biomarkers of liver and renal function in Jersey cows

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Jefferson R. Gandra , Caio S. Takiya , Tiago A. Del Valle , Erika R. de Sena Gandra , Regis L. Missio , Cibeli A. Pedrini , Euclides R. de Oliveira , Milena Bugoni , Rafael H.T.B. Goes
{"title":"Impact of a biological anti-mycotoxin feed additive on aflatoxin milk transfer, performance, and biomarkers of liver and renal function in Jersey cows","authors":"Jefferson R. Gandra ,&nbsp;Caio S. Takiya ,&nbsp;Tiago A. Del Valle ,&nbsp;Erika R. de Sena Gandra ,&nbsp;Regis L. Missio ,&nbsp;Cibeli A. Pedrini ,&nbsp;Euclides R. de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Milena Bugoni ,&nbsp;Rafael H.T.B. Goes","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mycotoxins are highly stable and can persist from grain harvest through animal feeding, potentially transferring to milk and exposing humans to these toxins. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of feeding an aluminosilicate-based product or a biological anti-mycotoxin additive on milk aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) concentration, milk production and composition, complete blood cell count, and biomarkers of renal and liver function. Five primiparous Jersey cows (105 ± 3 days in milk, milk yield 15.0 ± 4.25 kg/d) were used in a 5 × 5 Latin square experiment, where periods were composed of 12 d for treatment adaptation, 4 d for sampling, and 5 d for washout. Treatment sequences randomly assigned to cows included a control (CON) treatment without aflatoxin challenge and four treatments with an artificially contaminated diet containing aflatoxins at 100 µg/kg diet DM. These treatments were: 1) Mycotoxin (MTX), aflatoxin challenge with no anti-mycotoxin additive; 2) Adsorbent (ADS), aflatoxin challenge with an aluminosilicate-based product at 0.1 % diet DM; 3) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 1 (AM1), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.056 % diet DM; and 4) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 3 (AM3), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.167 % diet DM. The AM was composed of microminerals, methionine, silymarin, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria. Milk AFM1 concentrations were the lowest in CON (0.05 µg/kg), followed by AM3(0.24 µg/kg), with intermediate levels in AM1 (0.50 µg/kg) and ADS (0.60 µg/kg), and highest in MTX (0.86 µg/kg). Milk yield was the highest for AM3 (21.8 kg/d), with intermediate values observed for CON (17.5 kg/d) and AM1 (19.4 kg/d), and the lowest production observed for MTX (16.4 kg/d). Milk fat yield was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for CON and AM1, and the lowest yield found for ADS and MTX. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in blood was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for AM1 and ADS, and the lowest for CON and MTX. Urea to creatinine ratio was greater in CON and MTX groups compared to the other treatments. Blood alanine aminotransferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values for CON, and the lowest values for ADS, AM1, and AM3. Blood gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values observed for CON, AM1, and AM3, and the lowest value observed for ADS. The AM additive at the highest dose was more effective in reducing milk AFM1 excretion than ADS. The AM3 group demonstrated superior productivity compared to both the groups fed an artificially contaminated diet and the control group.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"319 ","pages":"Article 116181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124003092","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mycotoxins are highly stable and can persist from grain harvest through animal feeding, potentially transferring to milk and exposing humans to these toxins. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of feeding an aluminosilicate-based product or a biological anti-mycotoxin additive on milk aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) concentration, milk production and composition, complete blood cell count, and biomarkers of renal and liver function. Five primiparous Jersey cows (105 ± 3 days in milk, milk yield 15.0 ± 4.25 kg/d) were used in a 5 × 5 Latin square experiment, where periods were composed of 12 d for treatment adaptation, 4 d for sampling, and 5 d for washout. Treatment sequences randomly assigned to cows included a control (CON) treatment without aflatoxin challenge and four treatments with an artificially contaminated diet containing aflatoxins at 100 µg/kg diet DM. These treatments were: 1) Mycotoxin (MTX), aflatoxin challenge with no anti-mycotoxin additive; 2) Adsorbent (ADS), aflatoxin challenge with an aluminosilicate-based product at 0.1 % diet DM; 3) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 1 (AM1), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.056 % diet DM; and 4) Biological anti-mycotoxin additive 3 (AM3), aflatoxin challenge with AM at 0.167 % diet DM. The AM was composed of microminerals, methionine, silymarin, yeast, and lactic acid bacteria. Milk AFM1 concentrations were the lowest in CON (0.05 µg/kg), followed by AM3(0.24 µg/kg), with intermediate levels in AM1 (0.50 µg/kg) and ADS (0.60 µg/kg), and highest in MTX (0.86 µg/kg). Milk yield was the highest for AM3 (21.8 kg/d), with intermediate values observed for CON (17.5 kg/d) and AM1 (19.4 kg/d), and the lowest production observed for MTX (16.4 kg/d). Milk fat yield was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for CON and AM1, and the lowest yield found for ADS and MTX. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in blood was the highest for AM3, with intermediate values observed for AM1 and ADS, and the lowest for CON and MTX. Urea to creatinine ratio was greater in CON and MTX groups compared to the other treatments. Blood alanine aminotransferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values for CON, and the lowest values for ADS, AM1, and AM3. Blood gamma-glutamyl transferase concentration was the highest for MTX, with intermediate values observed for CON, AM1, and AM3, and the lowest value observed for ADS. The AM additive at the highest dose was more effective in reducing milk AFM1 excretion than ADS. The AM3 group demonstrated superior productivity compared to both the groups fed an artificially contaminated diet and the control group.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信