Effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy blanket on salivary cortisol and behavior in horses

E.F. Hartzler , B. Grooms , L. Smathers , P. Ames , B. Mandeville , S.V. Burk
{"title":"Effects of a pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy blanket on salivary cortisol and behavior in horses","authors":"E.F. Hartzler ,&nbsp;B. Grooms ,&nbsp;L. Smathers ,&nbsp;P. Ames ,&nbsp;B. Mandeville ,&nbsp;S.V. Burk","doi":"10.1016/j.eqre.2025.100019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Domesticated horses are frequently exposed to high-stress environments due to their housing, travel, and use in competitions. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been posited as a potential approach for alleviating horse stress, with research supporting PEMF for treatment of human stress related to mental health conditions. This study sought to determine if a commercial PEMF blanket affects horse salivary cortisol concentrations, relaxation behaviors, or stress behaviors. Horses (n = 36) were randomly assigned to two treatment groups and one control group. The Pr3 group received treatment at 1–6 Hz and the Pr7 group received treatment at 10–30 Hz. Both treatments were set at 5 millitesla (mT). The control (C) group was exposed to two conditions: wearing the blanket at 0 Hz (CB) and not wearing a blanket (CNB). Horses were exposed to 30 min treatments every other day for 15 days, with salivary cortisol sampling and behavior observations on days 1, 9, and 15. Salivary cortisol concentrations displayed some variability, but there were no significant decreases in salivary cortisol from pre to post when comparing conditions. Horses exhibited more relaxation behaviors under the CB condition when compared to the CNB condition (<em>p</em> = 0.031), but there were no significant differences when comparing controls and treatments. There were no significant differences for stress behaviors in any of the comparisons. Although the PEMF blanket treatment did not appear to reduce stress behaviors or salivary cortisol in our study, future research with longer treatment periods, alternate treatment protocols, and additional sampling times is recommended.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100019"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Equine Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949905425000015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Domesticated horses are frequently exposed to high-stress environments due to their housing, travel, and use in competitions. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy has been posited as a potential approach for alleviating horse stress, with research supporting PEMF for treatment of human stress related to mental health conditions. This study sought to determine if a commercial PEMF blanket affects horse salivary cortisol concentrations, relaxation behaviors, or stress behaviors. Horses (n = 36) were randomly assigned to two treatment groups and one control group. The Pr3 group received treatment at 1–6 Hz and the Pr7 group received treatment at 10–30 Hz. Both treatments were set at 5 millitesla (mT). The control (C) group was exposed to two conditions: wearing the blanket at 0 Hz (CB) and not wearing a blanket (CNB). Horses were exposed to 30 min treatments every other day for 15 days, with salivary cortisol sampling and behavior observations on days 1, 9, and 15. Salivary cortisol concentrations displayed some variability, but there were no significant decreases in salivary cortisol from pre to post when comparing conditions. Horses exhibited more relaxation behaviors under the CB condition when compared to the CNB condition (p = 0.031), but there were no significant differences when comparing controls and treatments. There were no significant differences for stress behaviors in any of the comparisons. Although the PEMF blanket treatment did not appear to reduce stress behaviors or salivary cortisol in our study, future research with longer treatment periods, alternate treatment protocols, and additional sampling times is recommended.
脉冲电磁场治疗毯对马唾液皮质醇和行为的影响
驯养的马经常暴露在高压力的环境中,因为他们的住房,旅行和在比赛中使用。脉冲电磁场(PEMF)疗法被认为是缓解马压力的一种潜在方法,研究支持PEMF治疗与精神健康状况相关的人类压力。本研究试图确定商业PEMF毯是否会影响马唾液皮质醇浓度、放松行为或压力行为。36匹马(n = )随机分为两个治疗组和一个对照组。Pr3组以1 ~ 6 Hz治疗,Pr7组以10 ~ 30 Hz治疗。两种处理均设置为5毫特斯拉(mT)。对照(C)组暴露于两种条件下:0 Hz (CB)穿毯子和不穿毯子(CNB)。马每隔一天接受30次 min治疗,持续15天,在第1、9和15天进行唾液皮质醇取样和行为观察。唾液皮质醇浓度表现出一定的可变性,但在比较条件时,唾液皮质醇从前到后没有显著下降。与CNB组相比,CB组马表现出更多的放松行为(p = 0.031),但对照组与处理组比较差异不显著。在任何比较中,压力行为都没有显著差异。虽然在我们的研究中,PEMF毯式治疗似乎没有减少应激行为或唾液皮质醇,但建议未来进行更长的治疗周期、替代治疗方案和额外采样时间的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信