Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Aria Darbandi MD , Andrew Schaver MD , Micah MacAskill MD , Rex Lutz DO , Amira Scaramella BS , Christian Sangio BS , John Shields MD , Alvin Ong MD , Matthew Bullock DO MPT
{"title":"Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Aria Darbandi MD ,&nbsp;Andrew Schaver MD ,&nbsp;Micah MacAskill MD ,&nbsp;Rex Lutz DO ,&nbsp;Amira Scaramella BS ,&nbsp;Christian Sangio BS ,&nbsp;John Shields MD ,&nbsp;Alvin Ong MD ,&nbsp;Matthew Bullock DO MPT","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2025.101615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The purpose of this study is to assess the short- and mid-term radiographic outcomes of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cone design for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective, multicenter analysis of rTKA patients utilizing femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cone placement from January 2017 to July 2022 was performed. Assessment of radiolucency was performed utilizing a novel “cones score” for radiolucency for tibial and femoral cones.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Sixty-four rTKAs (23 femoral and 59 tibial cones) with short-term follow-up (12-24 months) and 80 rTKA (24 femoral and 76 tibial cones) with mid-term follow-up (&gt;24 months) were assessed. No intraoperative complications were reported. No cases of cone or stem aseptic loosening were observed. The cones scoring system had a significantly strong intraclass correlation between the 3 reviewers (<em>P</em> &lt; .001). Of tibial cones, 96.6% and 96.1% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. Of femoral cones, 87.0% and 100% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. All tibial and femoral implants were deemed radiographically stable at last radiographic follow-up.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The utilization of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cones demonstrated excellent radiographic stability at short- and mid-term follow-ups. The use of this method has minimal risk of intraoperative or short-term failures. Surgeons should be familiar with this type of cone implantation system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101615"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344125000020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study is to assess the short- and mid-term radiographic outcomes of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cone design for revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA).

Methods

A retrospective, multicenter analysis of rTKA patients utilizing femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal cone placement from January 2017 to July 2022 was performed. Assessment of radiolucency was performed utilizing a novel “cones score” for radiolucency for tibial and femoral cones.

Results

Sixty-four rTKAs (23 femoral and 59 tibial cones) with short-term follow-up (12-24 months) and 80 rTKA (24 femoral and 76 tibial cones) with mid-term follow-up (>24 months) were assessed. No intraoperative complications were reported. No cases of cone or stem aseptic loosening were observed. The cones scoring system had a significantly strong intraclass correlation between the 3 reviewers (P < .001). Of tibial cones, 96.6% and 96.1% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. Of femoral cones, 87.0% and 100% had no change in cones scoring at short- and mid-term follow-ups, respectively. All tibial and femoral implants were deemed radiographically stable at last radiographic follow-up.

Conclusions

The utilization of a ream-then-broach metaphyseal cones demonstrated excellent radiographic stability at short- and mid-term follow-ups. The use of this method has minimal risk of intraoperative or short-term failures. Surgeons should be familiar with this type of cone implantation system.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty Today
Arthroplasty Today Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
258
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊介绍: Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信