‘–What time is it? –Twenty years past two.’ The role of utilitarian and playful engagement in robot appropriation in later life

Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol , Andrea Rosales , Rebeca Oliván
{"title":"‘–What time is it? –Twenty years past two.’ The role of utilitarian and playful engagement in robot appropriation in later life","authors":"Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol ,&nbsp;Andrea Rosales ,&nbsp;Rebeca Oliván","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2025.100119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>We analyzed the utilitarian and hedonic (playful) forms of engagement with a socially assistive robot (SAR) by dependent older people in a domestic environment. The case study involved seven users (73–88 years old, five women and two men) living in Barcelona with a certain degree of dependence. Participants hosted the robot in their homes for two months, and their appropriation processes moved between utilitarian (practical) and playful (hedonic) approaches. Practical users expressed a goal-oriented relation with the robot. They were attached to existing interaction scripts, whereas playful users showed comparatively higher levels of experimentation, expressed more entertainment, and perceived more companionship, which positively related to attachment. Playful relationships appear to relate to higher levels of adoption and appropriation of the robot compared to utilitarian ones. The case study demonstrates diverse paths of appropriating a new robotic technology in agentic and varied ways, which helps overcome common stereotypical assumptions that depict (dependent) older individuals as merely passive receivers of such technologies. In terms of design, all participants requested more voice interaction opportunities. Finally, the robot should include personalized hedonic features as playful opportunities to foster adoption.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307825000013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We analyzed the utilitarian and hedonic (playful) forms of engagement with a socially assistive robot (SAR) by dependent older people in a domestic environment. The case study involved seven users (73–88 years old, five women and two men) living in Barcelona with a certain degree of dependence. Participants hosted the robot in their homes for two months, and their appropriation processes moved between utilitarian (practical) and playful (hedonic) approaches. Practical users expressed a goal-oriented relation with the robot. They were attached to existing interaction scripts, whereas playful users showed comparatively higher levels of experimentation, expressed more entertainment, and perceived more companionship, which positively related to attachment. Playful relationships appear to relate to higher levels of adoption and appropriation of the robot compared to utilitarian ones. The case study demonstrates diverse paths of appropriating a new robotic technology in agentic and varied ways, which helps overcome common stereotypical assumptions that depict (dependent) older individuals as merely passive receivers of such technologies. In terms of design, all participants requested more voice interaction opportunities. Finally, the robot should include personalized hedonic features as playful opportunities to foster adoption.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信