Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Modalities among Patients seen at Federally Qualified Health Centers Funded by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Megan R.M. Aaronson , Nadereh Pourat , Connie Lu , Jayraan Badiee , Helen Yu-Lefler , Benjamin Picillo , Hank Hoang , Folasade P. May
{"title":"Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Modalities among Patients seen at Federally Qualified Health Centers Funded by the United States Health Resources and Services Administration","authors":"Megan R.M. Aaronson ,&nbsp;Nadereh Pourat ,&nbsp;Connie Lu ,&nbsp;Jayraan Badiee ,&nbsp;Helen Yu-Lefler ,&nbsp;Benjamin Picillo ,&nbsp;Hank Hoang ,&nbsp;Folasade P. May","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.102976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Federally qualified health centers provide primary care services to millions of low-income patients in the United States who face challenges accessing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to understand how patient-level factors influence CRC screening participation and screening modality choice in this setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We examined data from the 2022 Health Center Patient Survey, 2021 Uniform Data System, and Area Health Resource File. We performed generalized multilevel logistic regression and multinomial regression to measure associations between our independent variables and receipt of any CRC screening and of screening modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 1584 patients ages 50–75, most (56 %) reported having CRC screening, including 33 % with endoscopic screening only, 16 % with stool-based screening only, and 7 % with multiple modalities. Selected factors associated with any CRC screening included having five or more health center visits in the past year (aOR = 1.66, 95 %CI = 1.07–2.56), being insured (Medicaid aOR = 2.25, 95 %CI = 1.44–3.54; other insurance aOR = 2.69, 95 %CI = 1.51–4.82), living within 30  minutes of the health center (aOR = 1.93, 95 %CI = 1.15–3.25), having multiple comorbidities (aOR = 1.72, 95 %CI = 1.13–2.63), using telehealth (aOR = 1.52, 95 %CI = 1.02–2.27), and having a flu shot last year (aOR = 1.77, 95 %CI = 1.29–2.45). We observed that patients who are non-Hispanic Black (aOR = 3.52, 95 %CI = 1.28–9.68) and who do not speak English well or at all (aOR = 5.54, 95 %CI = 1.64–18.75) reported having multiple modalities.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Federally qualified health center patients reported endoscopic CRC screening more commonly than stool-based screening, and barriers to access such as distance to the health center and English proficiency were impactful. Increasing CRC screening in low-income populations requires improving access and promoting opportunities for less invasive screening.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38066,"journal":{"name":"Preventive Medicine Reports","volume":"50 ","pages":"Article 102976"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive Medicine Reports","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335525000154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Federally qualified health centers provide primary care services to millions of low-income patients in the United States who face challenges accessing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We aimed to understand how patient-level factors influence CRC screening participation and screening modality choice in this setting.

Methods

We examined data from the 2022 Health Center Patient Survey, 2021 Uniform Data System, and Area Health Resource File. We performed generalized multilevel logistic regression and multinomial regression to measure associations between our independent variables and receipt of any CRC screening and of screening modalities.

Results

Among 1584 patients ages 50–75, most (56 %) reported having CRC screening, including 33 % with endoscopic screening only, 16 % with stool-based screening only, and 7 % with multiple modalities. Selected factors associated with any CRC screening included having five or more health center visits in the past year (aOR = 1.66, 95 %CI = 1.07–2.56), being insured (Medicaid aOR = 2.25, 95 %CI = 1.44–3.54; other insurance aOR = 2.69, 95 %CI = 1.51–4.82), living within 30  minutes of the health center (aOR = 1.93, 95 %CI = 1.15–3.25), having multiple comorbidities (aOR = 1.72, 95 %CI = 1.13–2.63), using telehealth (aOR = 1.52, 95 %CI = 1.02–2.27), and having a flu shot last year (aOR = 1.77, 95 %CI = 1.29–2.45). We observed that patients who are non-Hispanic Black (aOR = 3.52, 95 %CI = 1.28–9.68) and who do not speak English well or at all (aOR = 5.54, 95 %CI = 1.64–18.75) reported having multiple modalities.

Conclusion

Federally qualified health center patients reported endoscopic CRC screening more commonly than stool-based screening, and barriers to access such as distance to the health center and English proficiency were impactful. Increasing CRC screening in low-income populations requires improving access and promoting opportunities for less invasive screening.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Preventive Medicine Reports
Preventive Medicine Reports Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
353
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信