Evaluating the Laboratory Performance of Pellet-Fueled Semigasifier Cookstoves

IF 10.8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Wyatt M. Champion*, Guofeng Shen, Craig Williams, Larry Virtaranta, Mark Barnes, Cara Christianson, Michael D. Hays and James J. Jetter, 
{"title":"Evaluating the Laboratory Performance of Pellet-Fueled Semigasifier Cookstoves","authors":"Wyatt M. Champion*,&nbsp;Guofeng Shen,&nbsp;Craig Williams,&nbsp;Larry Virtaranta,&nbsp;Mark Barnes,&nbsp;Cara Christianson,&nbsp;Michael D. Hays and James J. Jetter,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1000810.1021/acs.est.4c10008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study examines three representative semigasifier cookstove models each burning four types of pelletized-biomass fuel (hardwood, peanut hull, rice husk, and wheat straw) using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19867-1:2018 protocol. ISO tier ratings for fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions ranged 1–4 and 2–5 (where 5 = cleanest), respectively, suggesting that pellet-fueled cookstoves may provide substantial emissions reductions, dependent upon stove/fuel matching and operation, over other biomass-fueled cooking alternatives. PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission factors based on useful energy delivered (EF<sub>d</sub>) varied by up to 25-fold, and organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) EF<sub>d</sub> values respectively varied by &gt;200- and ∼100-fold, reflecting complex variability in PM<sub>2.5</sub> composition. These semigasifier cookstoves showed higher ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions but lower bulk PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions. Operation of pellet-fueled cookstoves at higher firepower resulted in higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> and UFP emission factors and higher EC-to-total-carbon ratios; operation at lower firepower resulted in higher gaseous pollutant emission factors. Results of this work provide technical guidance for stove developers, users, and policy-makers. These ISO-protocol-based emission factors are also pertinent to health and climate modeling efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 4","pages":"2006–2017 2006–2017"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines three representative semigasifier cookstove models each burning four types of pelletized-biomass fuel (hardwood, peanut hull, rice husk, and wheat straw) using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19867-1:2018 protocol. ISO tier ratings for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions ranged 1–4 and 2–5 (where 5 = cleanest), respectively, suggesting that pellet-fueled cookstoves may provide substantial emissions reductions, dependent upon stove/fuel matching and operation, over other biomass-fueled cooking alternatives. PM2.5 emission factors based on useful energy delivered (EFd) varied by up to 25-fold, and organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) EFd values respectively varied by >200- and ∼100-fold, reflecting complex variability in PM2.5 composition. These semigasifier cookstoves showed higher ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions but lower bulk PM2.5 emissions. Operation of pellet-fueled cookstoves at higher firepower resulted in higher PM2.5 and UFP emission factors and higher EC-to-total-carbon ratios; operation at lower firepower resulted in higher gaseous pollutant emission factors. Results of this work provide technical guidance for stove developers, users, and policy-makers. These ISO-protocol-based emission factors are also pertinent to health and climate modeling efforts.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
环境科学与技术
环境科学与技术 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
17.50
自引率
9.60%
发文量
12359
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences. Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信