Wyatt M. Champion*, Guofeng Shen, Craig Williams, Larry Virtaranta, Mark Barnes, Cara Christianson, Michael D. Hays and James J. Jetter,
{"title":"Evaluating the Laboratory Performance of Pellet-Fueled Semigasifier Cookstoves","authors":"Wyatt M. Champion*, Guofeng Shen, Craig Williams, Larry Virtaranta, Mark Barnes, Cara Christianson, Michael D. Hays and James J. Jetter, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.est.4c1000810.1021/acs.est.4c10008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study examines three representative semigasifier cookstove models each burning four types of pelletized-biomass fuel (hardwood, peanut hull, rice husk, and wheat straw) using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19867-1:2018 protocol. ISO tier ratings for fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions ranged 1–4 and 2–5 (where 5 = cleanest), respectively, suggesting that pellet-fueled cookstoves may provide substantial emissions reductions, dependent upon stove/fuel matching and operation, over other biomass-fueled cooking alternatives. PM<sub>2.5</sub> emission factors based on useful energy delivered (EF<sub>d</sub>) varied by up to 25-fold, and organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) EF<sub>d</sub> values respectively varied by >200- and ∼100-fold, reflecting complex variability in PM<sub>2.5</sub> composition. These semigasifier cookstoves showed higher ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions but lower bulk PM<sub>2.5</sub> emissions. Operation of pellet-fueled cookstoves at higher firepower resulted in higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> and UFP emission factors and higher EC-to-total-carbon ratios; operation at lower firepower resulted in higher gaseous pollutant emission factors. Results of this work provide technical guidance for stove developers, users, and policy-makers. These ISO-protocol-based emission factors are also pertinent to health and climate modeling efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":36,"journal":{"name":"环境科学与技术","volume":"59 4","pages":"2006–2017 2006–2017"},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学与技术","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.4c10008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines three representative semigasifier cookstove models each burning four types of pelletized-biomass fuel (hardwood, peanut hull, rice husk, and wheat straw) using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 19867-1:2018 protocol. ISO tier ratings for fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and carbon monoxide (CO) emissions ranged 1–4 and 2–5 (where 5 = cleanest), respectively, suggesting that pellet-fueled cookstoves may provide substantial emissions reductions, dependent upon stove/fuel matching and operation, over other biomass-fueled cooking alternatives. PM2.5 emission factors based on useful energy delivered (EFd) varied by up to 25-fold, and organic and elemental carbon (OC and EC) EFd values respectively varied by >200- and ∼100-fold, reflecting complex variability in PM2.5 composition. These semigasifier cookstoves showed higher ultrafine particle (UFP) emissions but lower bulk PM2.5 emissions. Operation of pellet-fueled cookstoves at higher firepower resulted in higher PM2.5 and UFP emission factors and higher EC-to-total-carbon ratios; operation at lower firepower resulted in higher gaseous pollutant emission factors. Results of this work provide technical guidance for stove developers, users, and policy-makers. These ISO-protocol-based emission factors are also pertinent to health and climate modeling efforts.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) is a co-sponsored academic and technical magazine by the Hubei Provincial Environmental Protection Bureau and the Hubei Provincial Academy of Environmental Sciences.
Environmental Science & Technology (ES&T) holds the status of Chinese core journals, scientific papers source journals of China, Chinese Science Citation Database source journals, and Chinese Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database source journals. This publication focuses on the academic field of environmental protection, featuring articles related to environmental protection and technical advancements.