Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Act as Virtual Safety Officers?

S. M. Supundrika Subasinghe, Simon G. Gersib, Thomas M. Frueh and Neal P. Mankad*, 
{"title":"Can Large Language Models (LLMs) Act as Virtual Safety Officers?","authors":"S. M. Supundrika Subasinghe,&nbsp;Simon G. Gersib,&nbsp;Thomas M. Frueh and Neal P. Mankad*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.chas.4c0009710.1021/acs.chas.4c00097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This study examines the reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems─specifically, the large language models (LLMs) ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini─to provide accurate lab safety advice, a critical need in high-risk environments. We evaluated LLM performance in addressing several chemical safety queries relevant to academic chemistry laboratories across the criteria of accuracy, relevance, clarity, completeness, and engagement. While all the LLMs tested generally delivered clear and accurate guidance, some shortcomings were identified, raising concerns about reliability during safety emergencies or for nonexpert users. Despite these issues, the findings suggest that with further refinement, AI has the potential to become a valuable tool for lab safety that is complementary to a human laboratory safety officer.</p>","PeriodicalId":73648,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chemical health & safety","volume":"32 1","pages":"39–47 39–47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chemical health & safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.4c00097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the reliability of artificial intelligence (AI) systems─specifically, the large language models (LLMs) ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini─to provide accurate lab safety advice, a critical need in high-risk environments. We evaluated LLM performance in addressing several chemical safety queries relevant to academic chemistry laboratories across the criteria of accuracy, relevance, clarity, completeness, and engagement. While all the LLMs tested generally delivered clear and accurate guidance, some shortcomings were identified, raising concerns about reliability during safety emergencies or for nonexpert users. Despite these issues, the findings suggest that with further refinement, AI has the potential to become a valuable tool for lab safety that is complementary to a human laboratory safety officer.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信