Mateus Zanovello, Vanderley M. John, Claire E. White and Sérgio C. Angulo*,
{"title":"Engineered Blended Thermoactivated Recycled Cement: A Study on Reactivity, Water Demand, Strength-Porosity, and CO2 Emissions","authors":"Mateus Zanovello, Vanderley M. John, Claire E. White and Sérgio C. Angulo*, ","doi":"10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c0656710.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Annually, 1 Gt of cement waste is produced, constituting one-fourth of recent cement production and surpassing the availability of most supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). It is known that the thermoactivation of cement waste (heating to 500 °C to drive off water molecules and hydroxyl units) recovers cement reactivity. However, from literature we show that this reactivity is insufficient for adequate strength gain due to the high surface area and, hence, high water demand of thermoactivated recycled cement (RC). Instead, as proposed herein, RC used as the dominant component (>75% wt) within an optimized particle packing system (<20% wt of micronized Portland cement) yields an engineered recycled cement (eRC) with comparable early- and late-age strength gain behavior to ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Evaluation of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reveals that eRC emits 198–320 kgCO<sub>2</sub>/t, which is substantially lower than that of scalable blended Portland cements. Deploying this technology together with other strategies, such as CO<sub>2</sub> capture by carbonation of cement waste, can mitigate 61% of projected 2050 CO<sub>2</sub> emissions of the cement industry (2.31 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub>/year).</p><p >This research supports the circular economy in the cement industry by engineering binders from cement waste with performance comparable to that of Portland cement.</p>","PeriodicalId":25,"journal":{"name":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","volume":"13 2","pages":"800–814 800–814"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06567","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acssuschemeng.4c06567","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Annually, 1 Gt of cement waste is produced, constituting one-fourth of recent cement production and surpassing the availability of most supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs). It is known that the thermoactivation of cement waste (heating to 500 °C to drive off water molecules and hydroxyl units) recovers cement reactivity. However, from literature we show that this reactivity is insufficient for adequate strength gain due to the high surface area and, hence, high water demand of thermoactivated recycled cement (RC). Instead, as proposed herein, RC used as the dominant component (>75% wt) within an optimized particle packing system (<20% wt of micronized Portland cement) yields an engineered recycled cement (eRC) with comparable early- and late-age strength gain behavior to ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Evaluation of CO2 emissions reveals that eRC emits 198–320 kgCO2/t, which is substantially lower than that of scalable blended Portland cements. Deploying this technology together with other strategies, such as CO2 capture by carbonation of cement waste, can mitigate 61% of projected 2050 CO2 emissions of the cement industry (2.31 Gt of CO2/year).
This research supports the circular economy in the cement industry by engineering binders from cement waste with performance comparable to that of Portland cement.
期刊介绍:
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering is a prestigious weekly peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the American Chemical Society. Dedicated to advancing the principles of green chemistry and green engineering, it covers a wide array of research topics including green chemistry, green engineering, biomass, alternative energy, and life cycle assessment.
The journal welcomes submissions in various formats, including Letters, Articles, Features, and Perspectives (Reviews), that address the challenges of sustainability in the chemical enterprise and contribute to the advancement of sustainable practices. Join us in shaping the future of sustainable chemistry and engineering.