AI-assisted warfarin dose optimisation with CURATE.AI for clinical impact: Retrospective data analysis

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tiffany Rui Xuan Gan, Lester W. J. Tan, Mathias Egermark, Anh T. L. Truong, Kirthika Kumar, Shi-Bei Tan, Sarah Tang, Agata Blasiak, Boon Cher Goh, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Dean Ho
{"title":"AI-assisted warfarin dose optimisation with CURATE.AI for clinical impact: Retrospective data analysis","authors":"Tiffany Rui Xuan Gan,&nbsp;Lester W. J. Tan,&nbsp;Mathias Egermark,&nbsp;Anh T. L. Truong,&nbsp;Kirthika Kumar,&nbsp;Shi-Bei Tan,&nbsp;Sarah Tang,&nbsp;Agata Blasiak,&nbsp;Boon Cher Goh,&nbsp;Kee Yuan Ngiam,&nbsp;Dean Ho","doi":"10.1002/btm2.10757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Standard-of-care for warfarin dose titration is conventionally based on physician-guided drug dosing. This may lead to frequent deviations from target international normalized ratio (INR) due to inter- and intra-patient variability and may potentially result in adverse events including recurrent thromboembolism and life-threatening hemorrhage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>We aim to employ CURATE.AI, a small-data, artificial intelligence-derived platform that has been clinically validated in a range of indications, to optimize and guide warfarin dosing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients/methods</h3>\n \n <p>A personalized CURATE.AI response profile was generated using warfarin dose (inputs) and corresponding change in INR between two consecutive days (phenotypic outputs) and used to identify and recommend an optimal dose to achieve target treatment outcomes. CURATE.AI's predictive performance was then evaluated with a set of metrics that assessed both technical performance and clinical relevance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this retrospective study of 127 patients, CURATE.AI fared better in terms of Percentage Absolute Prediction Error and Percentage Prediction Error of 20% compared to other models in the literature. It also had negligible underprediction bias, potentially translating into lower bleeding risk. Modeled potential time in therapeutic range with CURATE.AI was not significantly different from physician-guided dosing, so it is on-par yet provides a systematic approach to warfarin dosing, easing the mental-burden on guesswork by physicians.</p>\n \n <p>This study lays the groundwork for the prospective study of CURATE.AI as a clinical decision support system. CURATE.AI may facilitate the effective use of affordable warfarin with a well-established safety profile, without the need for costly, new oral anticoagulants. This can have significant impact both on the individual and public health.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9263,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/btm2.10757","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/btm2.10757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Standard-of-care for warfarin dose titration is conventionally based on physician-guided drug dosing. This may lead to frequent deviations from target international normalized ratio (INR) due to inter- and intra-patient variability and may potentially result in adverse events including recurrent thromboembolism and life-threatening hemorrhage.

Objectives

We aim to employ CURATE.AI, a small-data, artificial intelligence-derived platform that has been clinically validated in a range of indications, to optimize and guide warfarin dosing.

Patients/methods

A personalized CURATE.AI response profile was generated using warfarin dose (inputs) and corresponding change in INR between two consecutive days (phenotypic outputs) and used to identify and recommend an optimal dose to achieve target treatment outcomes. CURATE.AI's predictive performance was then evaluated with a set of metrics that assessed both technical performance and clinical relevance.

Results and conclusions

In this retrospective study of 127 patients, CURATE.AI fared better in terms of Percentage Absolute Prediction Error and Percentage Prediction Error of 20% compared to other models in the literature. It also had negligible underprediction bias, potentially translating into lower bleeding risk. Modeled potential time in therapeutic range with CURATE.AI was not significantly different from physician-guided dosing, so it is on-par yet provides a systematic approach to warfarin dosing, easing the mental-burden on guesswork by physicians.

This study lays the groundwork for the prospective study of CURATE.AI as a clinical decision support system. CURATE.AI may facilitate the effective use of affordable warfarin with a well-established safety profile, without the need for costly, new oral anticoagulants. This can have significant impact both on the individual and public health.

AI辅助华法林剂量优化与CURATE。人工智能对临床的影响:回顾性数据分析
华法林剂量滴定的护理标准通常是基于医生指导的药物剂量。由于患者之间和患者内部的差异,这可能导致与目标国际标准化比率(INR)的频繁偏差,并可能导致不良事件,包括复发性血栓栓塞和危及生命的出血。我们的目标是雇用CURATE。AI是一个小数据、人工智能衍生的平台,已在一系列适应症中得到临床验证,用于优化和指导华法林的剂量。患者/方法个性化的CURATE。使用华法林剂量(输入)和连续两天之间相应的INR变化(表型输出)生成AI反应概况,并用于确定和推荐实现目标治疗结果的最佳剂量。助理牧师。然后用一组评估技术性能和临床相关性的指标来评估人工智能的预测性能。结果与结论在这项127例患者的回顾性研究中,CURATE。与文献中的其他模型相比,AI在绝对预测误差百分比和20%的预测误差百分比方面表现更好。它也有可以忽略不计的低估偏差,潜在地转化为较低的出血风险。用CURATE模拟治疗范围内的电位时间。人工智能与医生指导的剂量没有显著差异,因此它是同等的,但提供了一种系统的华法林剂量方法,减轻了医生猜测的精神负担。本研究为CURATE的前瞻性研究奠定了基础。人工智能作为临床决策支持系统。助理牧师。人工智能可以促进有效使用价格合理且具有良好安全性的华法林,而不需要昂贵的新型口服抗凝剂。这可能对个人和公共健康产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
150
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, an official, peer-reviewed online open-access journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Society for Biological Engineering (SBE), focuses on how chemical and biological engineering approaches drive innovative technologies and solutions that impact clinical practice and commercial healthcare products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信