AI‐assisted warfarin dose optimisation with CURATE.AI for clinical impact: Retrospective data analysis

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Tiffany Rui Xuan Gan, Lester W. J. Tan, Mathias Egermark, Anh T. L. Truong, Kirthika Kumar, Shi‐Bei Tan, Sarah Tang, Agata Blasiak, Boon Cher Goh, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Dean Ho
{"title":"AI‐assisted warfarin dose optimisation with CURATE.AI for clinical impact: Retrospective data analysis","authors":"Tiffany Rui Xuan Gan, Lester W. J. Tan, Mathias Egermark, Anh T. L. Truong, Kirthika Kumar, Shi‐Bei Tan, Sarah Tang, Agata Blasiak, Boon Cher Goh, Kee Yuan Ngiam, Dean Ho","doi":"10.1002/btm2.10757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundStandard‐of‐care for warfarin dose titration is conventionally based on physician‐guided drug dosing. This may lead to frequent deviations from target international normalized ratio (INR) due to inter‐ and intra‐patient variability and may potentially result in adverse events including recurrent thromboembolism and life‐threatening hemorrhage.ObjectivesWe aim to employ CURATE.AI, a small‐data, artificial intelligence‐derived platform that has been clinically validated in a range of indications, to optimize and guide warfarin dosing.Patients/methodsA personalized CURATE.AI response profile was generated using warfarin dose (inputs) and corresponding change in INR between two consecutive days (phenotypic outputs) and used to identify and recommend an optimal dose to achieve target treatment outcomes. CURATE.AI's predictive performance was then evaluated with a set of metrics that assessed both technical performance and clinical relevance.Results and conclusionsIn this retrospective study of 127 patients, CURATE.AI fared better in terms of Percentage Absolute Prediction Error and Percentage Prediction Error of 20% compared to other models in the literature. It also had negligible underprediction bias, potentially translating into lower bleeding risk. Modeled potential time in therapeutic range with CURATE.AI was not significantly different from physician‐guided dosing, so it is on‐par yet provides a systematic approach to warfarin dosing, easing the mental‐burden on guesswork by physicians.This study lays the groundwork for the prospective study of CURATE.AI as a clinical decision support system. CURATE.AI may facilitate the effective use of affordable warfarin with a well‐established safety profile, without the need for costly, new oral anticoagulants. This can have significant impact both on the individual and public health.","PeriodicalId":9263,"journal":{"name":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioengineering & Translational Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/btm2.10757","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundStandard‐of‐care for warfarin dose titration is conventionally based on physician‐guided drug dosing. This may lead to frequent deviations from target international normalized ratio (INR) due to inter‐ and intra‐patient variability and may potentially result in adverse events including recurrent thromboembolism and life‐threatening hemorrhage.ObjectivesWe aim to employ CURATE.AI, a small‐data, artificial intelligence‐derived platform that has been clinically validated in a range of indications, to optimize and guide warfarin dosing.Patients/methodsA personalized CURATE.AI response profile was generated using warfarin dose (inputs) and corresponding change in INR between two consecutive days (phenotypic outputs) and used to identify and recommend an optimal dose to achieve target treatment outcomes. CURATE.AI's predictive performance was then evaluated with a set of metrics that assessed both technical performance and clinical relevance.Results and conclusionsIn this retrospective study of 127 patients, CURATE.AI fared better in terms of Percentage Absolute Prediction Error and Percentage Prediction Error of 20% compared to other models in the literature. It also had negligible underprediction bias, potentially translating into lower bleeding risk. Modeled potential time in therapeutic range with CURATE.AI was not significantly different from physician‐guided dosing, so it is on‐par yet provides a systematic approach to warfarin dosing, easing the mental‐burden on guesswork by physicians.This study lays the groundwork for the prospective study of CURATE.AI as a clinical decision support system. CURATE.AI may facilitate the effective use of affordable warfarin with a well‐established safety profile, without the need for costly, new oral anticoagulants. This can have significant impact both on the individual and public health.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
150
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Bioengineering & Translational Medicine, an official, peer-reviewed online open-access journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers (AIChE) and the Society for Biological Engineering (SBE), focuses on how chemical and biological engineering approaches drive innovative technologies and solutions that impact clinical practice and commercial healthcare products.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信