Acceptance and commitment therapy for nurses’ sleep, rumination, psychological flexibility, and it's neural mechanism: A randomized controlled fNIRS study

IF 4.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Difan Wang , Bingyan Lin , Jiaxue Du , Wenyu Liu , Tong Sun , Qingyi Li , Lijun Xiao
{"title":"Acceptance and commitment therapy for nurses’ sleep, rumination, psychological flexibility, and it's neural mechanism: A randomized controlled fNIRS study","authors":"Difan Wang ,&nbsp;Bingyan Lin ,&nbsp;Jiaxue Du ,&nbsp;Wenyu Liu ,&nbsp;Tong Sun ,&nbsp;Qingyi Li ,&nbsp;Lijun Xiao","doi":"10.1016/j.ijchp.2025.100543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Background: Given nurses often face sleep problems, this study compares two internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions to improve sleep quality (SQ), psychological flexibility (PF), reduce rumination, and explore neural mechanisms. <em>Methods:</em> 477 nurses were randomly assigned to ACT linear psychotherapy model (LINEAR), ACT loop psychotherapy model (LOOP) and wait-list group. SQ, rumination, and PF were assessed with questionnaires. Prefrontal cortical activation changes were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. <em>Results:</em> The linear mixed-effects model demonstrated significant improvements in SQ, PF, and reduced rumination compared to pre-intervention for both models through enhanced psychological flexibility. LOOP showed a significantly superior effect compared to LINEAR. DLPFC activation increased following both interventions, with LOOP additionally stimulating the frontopolar area. Changes in the DLPFC mediated the relationship between intervention and outcome improvements. Frontopolar changes mediated SQ improvements but not rumination or PF. No significant changes in functional connectivity were observed during the verbal fluency task. <em>Conclusions:</em> Both interventions improved outcome variables, with LOOP being notably more effective, offering a novel approach. Mediation analyses highlight the role of DLPFC activation in understanding ACT's mechanisms and targeting insomnia treatment, while the mechanisms of LOOP's superior effect warrant further research. <em>Trial Registration:</em> Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200063533). <span><span>https://www.chictr.org.cn/</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47673,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","volume":"25 1","pages":"Article 100543"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1697260025000018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Given nurses often face sleep problems, this study compares two internet-delivered Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) interventions to improve sleep quality (SQ), psychological flexibility (PF), reduce rumination, and explore neural mechanisms. Methods: 477 nurses were randomly assigned to ACT linear psychotherapy model (LINEAR), ACT loop psychotherapy model (LOOP) and wait-list group. SQ, rumination, and PF were assessed with questionnaires. Prefrontal cortical activation changes were measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Results: The linear mixed-effects model demonstrated significant improvements in SQ, PF, and reduced rumination compared to pre-intervention for both models through enhanced psychological flexibility. LOOP showed a significantly superior effect compared to LINEAR. DLPFC activation increased following both interventions, with LOOP additionally stimulating the frontopolar area. Changes in the DLPFC mediated the relationship between intervention and outcome improvements. Frontopolar changes mediated SQ improvements but not rumination or PF. No significant changes in functional connectivity were observed during the verbal fluency task. Conclusions: Both interventions improved outcome variables, with LOOP being notably more effective, offering a novel approach. Mediation analyses highlight the role of DLPFC activation in understanding ACT's mechanisms and targeting insomnia treatment, while the mechanisms of LOOP's superior effect warrant further research. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200063533). https://www.chictr.org.cn/
接受承诺疗法对护士睡眠、反刍、心理灵活性及其神经机制的影响:随机对照fNIRS研究。
背景:鉴于护士经常面临睡眠问题,本研究比较了两种网络接受与承诺治疗(ACT)干预措施在改善睡眠质量(SQ)、心理灵活性(PF)、减少反刍方面的作用,并探讨了神经机制。方法:将477名护士随机分为ACT线性心理治疗模型(linear)、ACT循环心理治疗模型(loop)和轮候组。SQ、反刍和PF用问卷进行评估。用功能近红外光谱法测量前额叶皮层的激活变化。结果:线性混合效应模型显示,与干预前相比,两种模型均通过增强心理灵活性而显著改善SQ、PF和减少反刍。LOOP的效果明显优于LINEAR。两种干预后,DLPFC的激活都增加了,LOOP额外刺激了额极区。DLPFC的变化介导了干预与结果改善之间的关系。额极变化介导了SQ的改善,但对反刍和PF没有影响。在言语流畅性任务中,功能连通性没有显著变化。结论:两种干预措施都改善了结果变量,LOOP明显更有效,提供了一种新的方法。调解分析强调了DLPFC激活在理解ACT的机制和靶向治疗失眠中的作用,而LOOP的优越作用机制有待进一步研究。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200063533)。https://www.chictr.org.cn/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology is dedicated to publishing manuscripts with a strong emphasis on both basic and applied research, encompassing experimental, clinical, and theoretical contributions that advance the fields of Clinical and Health Psychology. With a focus on four core domains—clinical psychology and psychotherapy, psychopathology, health psychology, and clinical neurosciences—the IJCHP seeks to provide a comprehensive platform for scholarly discourse and innovation. The journal accepts Original Articles (empirical studies) and Review Articles. Manuscripts submitted to IJCHP should be original and not previously published or under consideration elsewhere. All signing authors must unanimously agree on the submitted version of the manuscript. By submitting their work, authors agree to transfer their copyrights to the Journal for the duration of the editorial process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信