{"title":"Outcome of Single Dental Implants Over 38–40 Years: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study","authors":"Sargon Barkarmo, Jan Kowar","doi":"10.1111/cid.13443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This is a comprehensive, long-term follow-up study of single-implant treatments. At the Brånemark Clinic in Gothenburg, Sweden, during the period of 1982–1985, 16 patients received single-tooth implants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study evaluates the survival rate of the implants after nearly four decades, focusing on the biological and technical complications.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Of the original 16 patients with a total of 23 implants, 13 patients with 18 implants were available for the follow-up and were included in the study. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed on these patients.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The cumulative survival rates were 95.6% for the implants and 60.9% for the implant-supported crowns after 38–40 years in function. The marginal bone level changes were 0.9 ± 1.0 mm (range, −0.5─3.0 mm) over the follow-up period.</p>\n \n <p>The frequency of biological complications was low; although mucositis was common, no cases of peri-implantitis were observed. The mean plaque index was 16.9% ± 11.6% (range, 1%─34%) and the mean probing depth around the implants was 3.8 ± 2.2 mm (range, 0.0─7.0 mm). Few technical complications were observed, although many of the original implant-supported crowns had been replaced for esthetic reasons.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The findings emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up in implant dentistry, particularly for younger patients, to improve understanding of potential complications and the longevity of treatment outcomes. Overall, single-tooth implants have a favorable long-term prognosis, though crown replacement may eventually be necessary.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50679,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cid.13443","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cid.13443","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
This is a comprehensive, long-term follow-up study of single-implant treatments. At the Brånemark Clinic in Gothenburg, Sweden, during the period of 1982–1985, 16 patients received single-tooth implants.
Objective
This study evaluates the survival rate of the implants after nearly four decades, focusing on the biological and technical complications.
Methods
Of the original 16 patients with a total of 23 implants, 13 patients with 18 implants were available for the follow-up and were included in the study. Clinical and radiographic examinations were performed on these patients.
Results
The cumulative survival rates were 95.6% for the implants and 60.9% for the implant-supported crowns after 38–40 years in function. The marginal bone level changes were 0.9 ± 1.0 mm (range, −0.5─3.0 mm) over the follow-up period.
The frequency of biological complications was low; although mucositis was common, no cases of peri-implantitis were observed. The mean plaque index was 16.9% ± 11.6% (range, 1%─34%) and the mean probing depth around the implants was 3.8 ± 2.2 mm (range, 0.0─7.0 mm). Few technical complications were observed, although many of the original implant-supported crowns had been replaced for esthetic reasons.
Conclusion
The findings emphasize the importance of long-term follow-up in implant dentistry, particularly for younger patients, to improve understanding of potential complications and the longevity of treatment outcomes. Overall, single-tooth implants have a favorable long-term prognosis, though crown replacement may eventually be necessary.
期刊介绍:
The goal of Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research is to advance the scientific and technical aspects relating to dental implants and related scientific subjects. Dissemination of new and evolving information related to dental implants and the related science is the primary goal of our journal.
The range of topics covered by the journals will include but be not limited to:
New scientific developments relating to bone
Implant surfaces and their relationship to the surrounding tissues
Computer aided implant designs
Computer aided prosthetic designs
Immediate implant loading
Immediate implant placement
Materials relating to bone induction and conduction
New surgical methods relating to implant placement
New materials and methods relating to implant restorations
Methods for determining implant stability
A primary focus of the journal is publication of evidenced based articles evaluating to new dental implants, techniques and multicenter studies evaluating these treatments. In addition basic science research relating to wound healing and osseointegration will be an important focus for the journal.