Transitioning to quick response codes for patient information leaflet delivery.

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Githa Singh, Sarel J. Brand, Vanessa Steenkamp
{"title":"Transitioning to quick response codes for patient information leaflet delivery.","authors":"Githa Singh,&nbsp;Sarel J. Brand,&nbsp;Vanessa Steenkamp","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2025.100563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The inclusion of a patient information leaflet (PIL) in medicine packaging is a legal requirement in most countries.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate the feasibility of using quick response (QR) codes for electronic patient information leaflet (ePIL) delivery.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>A mixed-method study based on surveys was conducted at the Tshwane District Hospital in South Africa. The demographics, ability and willingness of patients (330) and pharmacy staff (16) to scan a QR code for a commonly prescribed medicine was captured. A focus group study among 18 regulatory affairs pharmacists gauged their perception of ease of implementation of QR codes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 330 patients, most were 26–55 years of age (67 %) and 70 % were female. Irrespective of patient age and gender, &gt;80 % were willing/ able to scan the QR code and preferred the ePIL (35 %) or ePIL with a hardcopy (45 %). Patients (&gt;96 %) found it easy to read the ePIL (<em>C</em> = 0.487, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and locate the information sought (<em>C</em> = 0.521, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). This sentiment was shared by dispensing pharmacy staff: easier to read (<em>C</em> = 0.746, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) and locate information (<em>C</em> = 0.630, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.05), with 69 % preferring either the ePIL or ePIL with a hardcopy. All the regulatory affairs pharmacists preferred the ePIL and indicated that it was easy to create a QR code for ePILs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Patients, dispensing pharmacy staff, and regulatory affairs pharmacists are willing to transition to ePILs. This makes going green and updating information in real time possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276625000046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The inclusion of a patient information leaflet (PIL) in medicine packaging is a legal requirement in most countries.

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of using quick response (QR) codes for electronic patient information leaflet (ePIL) delivery.

Method

A mixed-method study based on surveys was conducted at the Tshwane District Hospital in South Africa. The demographics, ability and willingness of patients (330) and pharmacy staff (16) to scan a QR code for a commonly prescribed medicine was captured. A focus group study among 18 regulatory affairs pharmacists gauged their perception of ease of implementation of QR codes.

Results

Of the 330 patients, most were 26–55 years of age (67 %) and 70 % were female. Irrespective of patient age and gender, >80 % were willing/ able to scan the QR code and preferred the ePIL (35 %) or ePIL with a hardcopy (45 %). Patients (>96 %) found it easy to read the ePIL (C = 0.487, p < 0.001) and locate the information sought (C = 0.521, p < 0.001). This sentiment was shared by dispensing pharmacy staff: easier to read (C = 0.746, p < 0.05) and locate information (C = 0.630, p < 0.05), with 69 % preferring either the ePIL or ePIL with a hardcopy. All the regulatory affairs pharmacists preferred the ePIL and indicated that it was easy to create a QR code for ePILs.

Conclusion

Patients, dispensing pharmacy staff, and regulatory affairs pharmacists are willing to transition to ePILs. This makes going green and updating information in real time possible.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信