Bridging the gap: Enhancing pharmacist-physiscian collaboration through the provision of comprehensive medication reviews in community pharmacy

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ana I. Sanchez-Molina , Shalom I. Benrimoj , Ramon Ferri-Garcia , Fernando Martinez-Martinez , Miguel Angel Gastelurrutia , Noelia Amador-Fernandez , Victoria Garcia-Cardenas
{"title":"Bridging the gap: Enhancing pharmacist-physiscian collaboration through the provision of comprehensive medication reviews in community pharmacy","authors":"Ana I. Sanchez-Molina ,&nbsp;Shalom I. Benrimoj ,&nbsp;Ramon Ferri-Garcia ,&nbsp;Fernando Martinez-Martinez ,&nbsp;Miguel Angel Gastelurrutia ,&nbsp;Noelia Amador-Fernandez ,&nbsp;Victoria Garcia-Cardenas","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Collaborative practice between physicians and pharmacists is particularly important in the provision of pharmacy services, such as Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMR), which often require a close coordination between these professionals. Understanding the level and nature of this collaboration can assist in the development of strategies to enhance integrated care.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>(1) To evaluate the changes in level of collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians in the context of a CMR service compared to usual practice, from the perspective of community pharmacists, and (2) to explore the determinants of such collaborative practice.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This research was conducted alongside a 12-months prospective longitudinal observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Community pharmacists providing CMR and pharmacists providing usual care (nCMR) from six provinces in Spain participated in the study. To measure the level of collaborative practice from the perspective of the community pharmacist, a previously validated tool was used. Collaborative practice was assessed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. A multiple regression analysis was undertaken.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>323 pharmacists participated in the study. At the 12-month time point there were statistical differences between CMR and nCMR groups for all factors considered in the level of collaborative practice. Determinants which showed positive significant differences between groups included: rural location of the pharmacy, pharmacists being a pharmacy owner, and female gender of the physician. The age of the pharmacist was negatively associated with higher levels of collaborative practice.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The study provides novel evidence on the level and nature of the collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":"17 ","pages":"Article 100555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787040/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624001525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Collaborative practice between physicians and pharmacists is particularly important in the provision of pharmacy services, such as Comprehensive Medication Reviews (CMR), which often require a close coordination between these professionals. Understanding the level and nature of this collaboration can assist in the development of strategies to enhance integrated care.

Objectives

(1) To evaluate the changes in level of collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians in the context of a CMR service compared to usual practice, from the perspective of community pharmacists, and (2) to explore the determinants of such collaborative practice.

Design

This research was conducted alongside a 12-months prospective longitudinal observational study.

Methods

Community pharmacists providing CMR and pharmacists providing usual care (nCMR) from six provinces in Spain participated in the study. To measure the level of collaborative practice from the perspective of the community pharmacist, a previously validated tool was used. Collaborative practice was assessed at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. A multiple regression analysis was undertaken.

Results

323 pharmacists participated in the study. At the 12-month time point there were statistical differences between CMR and nCMR groups for all factors considered in the level of collaborative practice. Determinants which showed positive significant differences between groups included: rural location of the pharmacy, pharmacists being a pharmacy owner, and female gender of the physician. The age of the pharmacist was negatively associated with higher levels of collaborative practice.

Conclusion

The study provides novel evidence on the level and nature of the collaborative practice between community pharmacists and physicians.
弥合差距:通过在社区药房提供全面的药物审查,加强药剂师和医生的合作。
背景:医生和药剂师之间的合作实践在提供药学服务方面尤为重要,例如综合用药审查(CMR),这通常需要这些专业人员之间的密切协调。了解这种合作的水平和性质有助于制定加强综合护理的战略。目的:(1)从社区药剂师的角度,评估CMR服务背景下社区药剂师和医生之间合作实践水平与常规实践相比的变化;(2)探索这种合作实践的决定因素。设计:本研究与一项为期12个月的前瞻性纵向观察研究同时进行。方法:西班牙6个省提供CMR的社区药剂师和提供常规护理的药剂师参与研究。为了从社区药剂师的角度衡量合作实践的水平,使用了一个先前经过验证的工具。在基线、6个月和12个月对合作实践进行评估。进行多元回归分析。结果:323名药师参与研究。在12个月的时间点上,CMR组和nCMR组在协作实践水平上的所有因素都有统计学差异。组间存在显著正差异的决定因素包括:药店的农村位置、药剂师是否为药店老板和医生的女性性别。药剂师的年龄与更高水平的合作实践负相关。结论:本研究为社区药师与医师合作实践的水平和性质提供了新的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信