The contribution of leaders' and managers' attributes, values, principles, and behaviours to the sustainable implementation of Lean in healthcare: A realist review protocol.

HRB open research Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/hrbopenres.13933.1
Anne Marie Keown, Seán Paul Teeling, Martin McNamara
{"title":"The contribution of leaders' and managers' attributes, values, principles, and behaviours to the sustainable implementation of Lean in healthcare: A realist review protocol.","authors":"Anne Marie Keown, Seán Paul Teeling, Martin McNamara","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13933.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Global healthcare faces challenges such as rising costs, budget constraints, aging populations, chronic diseases, and increasing patient expectations. Healthcare organisations are deploying continuous improvement methodologies to address these challenges. Lean, derived from the Toyota Production System, focuses on eliminating non-value-adding activity and enhancing efficiency, making it a prominent quality improvement approach in healthcare. Effective implementation of Lean requires robust leadership to sustain improvements and foster a culture of continuous improvement. However, the attributes, values, principles, and behaviours of effective Lean leaders in healthcare remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This realist review protocol details methods to research how leaders' and managers' attributes, values, principles, and behaviours contribute to the sustainable implementation of Lean in healthcare. Following the RAMESES guidelines, a five-stage structured methodology will be used: defining the scope of the review and developing initial theories, developing the search strategy, reviewing primary studies and extracting data, synthesising evidence and developing conclusions, refining theory iteratively, and disseminating findings. An Expert Panel and reference groups of healthcare managers and leaders will refine candidate programme theories (CPTs) into initial programme theories (IPTs), guiding detailed evidence searches and data extraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This realist review will deepen our understanding of the specific mechanisms by which leadership impacts Lean implementation outcomes in the context of acute hospitals. By exploring how leadership attributes, values, principles and behaviours shape outcomes for diverse stakeholders, the review aims to provide critical insights into the dynamics driving the success of Lean in healthcare. The findings will inform policy and practice, enhancing leadership strategies to improve patient and staff experiences, patient outcomes, and organizational performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":"7 ","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13933.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Global healthcare faces challenges such as rising costs, budget constraints, aging populations, chronic diseases, and increasing patient expectations. Healthcare organisations are deploying continuous improvement methodologies to address these challenges. Lean, derived from the Toyota Production System, focuses on eliminating non-value-adding activity and enhancing efficiency, making it a prominent quality improvement approach in healthcare. Effective implementation of Lean requires robust leadership to sustain improvements and foster a culture of continuous improvement. However, the attributes, values, principles, and behaviours of effective Lean leaders in healthcare remain underexplored.

Methods: This realist review protocol details methods to research how leaders' and managers' attributes, values, principles, and behaviours contribute to the sustainable implementation of Lean in healthcare. Following the RAMESES guidelines, a five-stage structured methodology will be used: defining the scope of the review and developing initial theories, developing the search strategy, reviewing primary studies and extracting data, synthesising evidence and developing conclusions, refining theory iteratively, and disseminating findings. An Expert Panel and reference groups of healthcare managers and leaders will refine candidate programme theories (CPTs) into initial programme theories (IPTs), guiding detailed evidence searches and data extraction.

Conclusion: This realist review will deepen our understanding of the specific mechanisms by which leadership impacts Lean implementation outcomes in the context of acute hospitals. By exploring how leadership attributes, values, principles and behaviours shape outcomes for diverse stakeholders, the review aims to provide critical insights into the dynamics driving the success of Lean in healthcare. The findings will inform policy and practice, enhancing leadership strategies to improve patient and staff experiences, patient outcomes, and organizational performance.

领导者和管理者的属性、价值观、原则和行为对医疗保健精益可持续实施的贡献:一个现实的审查协议。
背景:全球医疗保健面临着成本上升、预算限制、人口老龄化、慢性病和患者期望增加等挑战。医疗保健组织正在部署持续改进的方法来应对这些挑战。精益源于丰田生产系统,侧重于消除非增值活动和提高效率,使其成为医疗保健领域突出的质量改进方法。精益的有效实施需要强有力的领导来维持改进和培养持续改进的文化。然而,医疗保健领域有效的精益领导者的属性、价值观、原则和行为仍未得到充分探讨。方法:这个现实主义回顾协议详细的方法来研究领导者和管理者的属性,价值观,原则和行为如何促进精益在医疗保健中的可持续实施。遵循RAMESES指南,将使用五阶段结构化方法:定义审查范围和发展初步理论,制定搜索策略,审查主要研究和提取数据,综合证据和发展结论,迭代改进理论,传播发现。专家小组和医疗保健管理人员和领导的参考小组将把候选规划理论(CPTs)提炼成初始规划理论(IPTs),指导详细的证据搜索和数据提取。结论:这一现实主义的回顾将加深我们对领导力影响急性医院精益实施结果的具体机制的理解。通过探索领导属性、价值观、原则和行为如何塑造不同利益相关者的结果,本综述旨在为推动医疗保健精益成功的动力提供关键见解。研究结果将为政策和实践提供信息,加强领导战略,以改善患者和工作人员的体验、患者的治疗结果和组织绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信