Validity of HELT-E2S2 Score in Predicting Ischemic Stroke in Japanese Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Circulation Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-23 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0715
Miyo Nakano, Yusuke Kondo, Yuki Shiko, Masahiro Nakano, Takatsugu Kajiyama, Ryo Ito, Toshinori Chiba, Yutaka Yoshino, Satoko Ryuzaki, Yukiko Takanashi, Yuya Komai, Shoko Narumi, Yoshio Kobayashi
{"title":"Validity of HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub> Score in Predicting Ischemic Stroke in Japanese Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation With Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.","authors":"Miyo Nakano, Yusuke Kondo, Yuki Shiko, Masahiro Nakano, Takatsugu Kajiyama, Ryo Ito, Toshinori Chiba, Yutaka Yoshino, Satoko Ryuzaki, Yukiko Takanashi, Yuya Komai, Shoko Narumi, Yoshio Kobayashi","doi":"10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>score, a novel risk stratification system, was developed to determine the incidence of ischemic stroke in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It has been suggested that the HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>score is more useful than the CHADS<sub>2</sub>and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores for Japanese patients with NVAF. This study determined the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with NVAF and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and assessed the validity of the HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>score in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the database of the CIED clinic of Chiba University Hospital and investigated the incidence of ischemic stroke according to the HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>score. Of the 730 consecutive patients who were followed-up at the CIED clinic, those without NVAF were excluded, leaving 362 patients in this study (mean [±SD] follow-up period, 64±48 months; mean age, 73±16 years; 65% male). The mean CHADS<sub>2</sub>and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc scores were 1.8±1.2 and 2.8±1.6 points, respectively. During follow-up, 31 (8.6%) patients experienced ischemic stroke. The c-statistic for the HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>score was 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.657-0.795), which was higher than the c-statistics for the CHADS<sub>2</sub>(0.704; 95% CI 0.647-0.768; P=0.025) and CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VASc (0.700; 95% CI:0.621-0.747; P=0.0097) scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Risk stratification for ischemic stroke using the HELT-E<sub>2</sub>S<sub>2</sub>score is valid in Japanese patients with NVAF and CIEDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50691,"journal":{"name":"Circulation Journal","volume":" ","pages":"765-773"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-24-0715","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The HELT-E2S2score, a novel risk stratification system, was developed to determine the incidence of ischemic stroke in Japanese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It has been suggested that the HELT-E2S2score is more useful than the CHADS2and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for Japanese patients with NVAF. This study determined the incidence of ischemic stroke in patients with NVAF and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and assessed the validity of the HELT-E2S2score in this population.

Methods and results: We retrospectively analyzed the database of the CIED clinic of Chiba University Hospital and investigated the incidence of ischemic stroke according to the HELT-E2S2score. Of the 730 consecutive patients who were followed-up at the CIED clinic, those without NVAF were excluded, leaving 362 patients in this study (mean [±SD] follow-up period, 64±48 months; mean age, 73±16 years; 65% male). The mean CHADS2and CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 1.8±1.2 and 2.8±1.6 points, respectively. During follow-up, 31 (8.6%) patients experienced ischemic stroke. The c-statistic for the HELT-E2S2score was 0.719 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.657-0.795), which was higher than the c-statistics for the CHADS2(0.704; 95% CI 0.647-0.768; P=0.025) and CHA2DS2-VASc (0.700; 95% CI:0.621-0.747; P=0.0097) scores.

Conclusions: Risk stratification for ischemic stroke using the HELT-E2S2score is valid in Japanese patients with NVAF and CIEDs.

HELT-E2S2评分预测日本非瓣膜性心房颤动患者心脏植入式电子装置缺血性卒中的有效性
背景:HELT-E2S2score是一种新的风险分层系统,用于确定日本非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者缺血性卒中的发生率。有研究表明,对于日本非瓣瓣性房颤患者,helt - e2s2评分比chads2和CHA2DS2-VASc评分更有用。本研究确定了非瓣膜性房颤和心脏植入式电子装置(cied)患者缺血性卒中的发生率,并评估了helt - e2s2评分在该人群中的有效性。方法与结果:回顾性分析千叶大学附属医院CIED门诊数据库,根据helt - e2s2评分调查缺血性脑卒中发生率。在CIED诊所连续随访的730例患者中,排除无NVAF的患者,本研究中有362例患者(平均[±SD]随访期,64±48个月;平均年龄73±16岁;65%的男性)。chads2和CHA2DS2-VASc平均评分分别为1.8±1.2分和2.8±1.6分。随访期间,31例(8.6%)患者发生缺血性脑卒中。helt - e2s2评分的c-统计量为0.719(95%可信区间[CI] 0.657-0.795),高于CHADS2评分的c-统计量(0.704;95% ci 0.647-0.768;P=0.025)和CHA2DS2-VASc (0.700;95%置信区间:0.621—-0.747;P = 0.0097)。结论:使用helt - e2s2评分进行缺血性卒中风险分层在日本非瓣膜性房颤和cied患者中是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation Journal
Circulation Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
471
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信