Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures.

IF 4.3 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Kelvin S C Cheung, Kai Chun Augustine Chan, Amy Cheung, Ping Keung Chan, Michelle Hilda Luk, Kwong Yuen Chiu, Henry Fu
{"title":"Current trends of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): choosing between robotic-assisted and conventional surgeries and timing of procedures.","authors":"Kelvin S C Cheung, Kai Chun Augustine Chan, Amy Cheung, Ping Keung Chan, Michelle Hilda Luk, Kwong Yuen Chiu, Henry Fu","doi":"10.1186/s42836-024-00289-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With robotic advancements in UKA technology, we sought to explore if robotic-assisted UKA could translate to clinical benefits such as reduced hospital stays and lowered emergency readmissions. Also, current utilization trends of UKA and choice of procedure timing (unilateral [uUKA] vs. one-staged bilateral UKA [biUKA]) could be explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study utilizing the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) for data retrieval. All patients who had undergone primary UKA in all Hospital Authority (HA) hospitals in HK from 2021-2023 were included. Primary outcomes included utilization of UKA compared to TKA and percentage utilization of different UKA systems, namely, conventional, Mako, and Cori/Navio systems, from 2021-2023. Secondary outcomes involved: (1) patient demographics, (2) postoperative average length of stay (ALOS), (3) 30-day and 90-day postoperative Accident and Emergency Department (AED) attendance, (4) surgical times (skin-to-skin) and (5) 90-day mortality and reoperation. Differences in outcomes between uUKA and biUKA and between different robotic systems were examined. Regression analysis was performed to study if utilization of robotic-assisted systems could contribute to reduced hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>UKA accounted for 15.2% of primary knee arthroplasties throughout 2021-2023. Robotic-assisted UKA (Mako and Navio/Cori) has shown an increasing utilization since 2022 in both unilateral (16.0% to 25.9%) and bilateral operations (17.8% to 29.0%). Mako had shorter ALOS than Navio/Cori (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.006) and significantly shorter ALOS than conventional UKA (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.004). Utilization of Mako was predictive of shortened ALOS on multi-linear regression (β = - 0.056; P = 0.049). Interestingly, biUKAs, especially conventional ones, showed a lower attendance rate than uUKAs at 30-day (2.9% VS 6.9%; P = 0.036) and 90-days (7.8% VS 15.7%; P = 0.004). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a prolonged surgical time of 16.4 min in uUKA and 29.1 min in biUKA compared to conventional operations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>UKA utilization has dropped since 2021 but the percentage of robotic-assisted UKA has risen. Mako yielded promising results in reducing hospital stays compared to conventional operations. Sub-group analysis (Mako versus Cori/Navio) highlighted the importance of distinguishing between different robotic platforms. For patients with bilateral unicompartmental OA, biUKA was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to unilateral operations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered (HKU/ HA HKW IRB; Ref No: 24-373).</p>","PeriodicalId":52831,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty","volume":"7 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11789413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-024-00289-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With robotic advancements in UKA technology, we sought to explore if robotic-assisted UKA could translate to clinical benefits such as reduced hospital stays and lowered emergency readmissions. Also, current utilization trends of UKA and choice of procedure timing (unilateral [uUKA] vs. one-staged bilateral UKA [biUKA]) could be explored.

Methods: This was a retrospective study utilizing the Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (CDARS) for data retrieval. All patients who had undergone primary UKA in all Hospital Authority (HA) hospitals in HK from 2021-2023 were included. Primary outcomes included utilization of UKA compared to TKA and percentage utilization of different UKA systems, namely, conventional, Mako, and Cori/Navio systems, from 2021-2023. Secondary outcomes involved: (1) patient demographics, (2) postoperative average length of stay (ALOS), (3) 30-day and 90-day postoperative Accident and Emergency Department (AED) attendance, (4) surgical times (skin-to-skin) and (5) 90-day mortality and reoperation. Differences in outcomes between uUKA and biUKA and between different robotic systems were examined. Regression analysis was performed to study if utilization of robotic-assisted systems could contribute to reduced hospital stays.

Results: UKA accounted for 15.2% of primary knee arthroplasties throughout 2021-2023. Robotic-assisted UKA (Mako and Navio/Cori) has shown an increasing utilization since 2022 in both unilateral (16.0% to 25.9%) and bilateral operations (17.8% to 29.0%). Mako had shorter ALOS than Navio/Cori (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.006) and significantly shorter ALOS than conventional UKA (2.9 ± 1.6 vs. 3.6 ± 2.6 days; P = 0.004). Utilization of Mako was predictive of shortened ALOS on multi-linear regression (β = - 0.056; P = 0.049). Interestingly, biUKAs, especially conventional ones, showed a lower attendance rate than uUKAs at 30-day (2.9% VS 6.9%; P = 0.036) and 90-days (7.8% VS 15.7%; P = 0.004). Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a prolonged surgical time of 16.4 min in uUKA and 29.1 min in biUKA compared to conventional operations.

Conclusion: UKA utilization has dropped since 2021 but the percentage of robotic-assisted UKA has risen. Mako yielded promising results in reducing hospital stays compared to conventional operations. Sub-group analysis (Mako versus Cori/Navio) highlighted the importance of distinguishing between different robotic platforms. For patients with bilateral unicompartmental OA, biUKA was shown to be a safe and effective alternative to unilateral operations.

Trial registration: Registered (HKU/ HA HKW IRB; Ref No: 24-373).

单室膝关节置换术(UKA)的当前趋势:在机器人辅助手术和传统手术之间的选择以及手术的时机。
背景:随着机器人在UKA技术上的进步,我们试图探索机器人辅助UKA是否可以转化为临床益处,如减少住院时间和降低急诊再入院率。此外,可以探讨当前UKA的使用趋势和手术时机的选择(单侧[uUKA]与单阶段双侧UKA [biUKA])。方法:本研究采用临床数据分析和报告系统(CDARS)进行数据检索。所有于2021-2023年间在香港所有医院管理局(医管局)医院接受初级UKA治疗的病人均包括在内。主要结果包括2021-2023年UKA的利用率与TKA的比较以及不同UKA系统(即常规、Mako和Cori/Navio系统)的利用率百分比。次要结局包括:(1)患者人口统计学,(2)术后平均住院时间(ALOS),(3)术后30天和90天急诊科(AED)出勤情况,(4)手术次数(皮肤接触),(5)90天死亡率和再手术。研究了uka和biUKA之间以及不同机器人系统之间结果的差异。采用回归分析来研究机器人辅助系统的使用是否有助于减少住院时间。结果:在2021-2023年期间,UKA占原发性膝关节置换术的15.2%。自2022年以来,机器人辅助UKA (Mako和Navio/Cori)在单侧(16.0%至25.9%)和双边(17.8%至29.0%)作业中的利用率均有所提高。Mako的ALOS短于Navio/Cori(2.9±1.6 vs. 3.6±2.6)天;P = 0.006),且ALOS明显短于常规UKA(2.9±1.6 vs. 3.6±2.6天;p = 0.004)。多元线性回归分析表明,利用Mako可预测缩短ALOS (β = - 0.056;p = 0.049)。有趣的是,biUKAs,特别是传统ukas,在30天的出勤率低于uUKAs (2.9% VS 6.9%;P = 0.036)和90天(7.8% VS 15.7%;p = 0.004)。与传统手术相比,机器人辅助手术延长了uUKA的16.4分钟和biUKA的29.1分钟的手术时间。结论:自2021年以来,UKA的使用率有所下降,但机器人辅助UKA的比例有所上升。与传统手术相比,Mako在缩短住院时间方面取得了可喜的成果。分组分析(Mako与Cori/Navio)强调了区分不同机器人平台的重要性。对于双侧单侧OA患者,biUKA被证明是一种安全有效的替代单侧手术的方法。试验注册:已注册(港大/医管局HKW IRB;参考编号:24-373)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Arthroplasty
Arthroplasty ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信