“On the OB Side of Things, It's Completely Disconnected”: Early Implementation of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and Health Care in the Perinatal Period

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura B. Attanasio PhD , Kimberley H. Geissler PhD
{"title":"“On the OB Side of Things, It's Completely Disconnected”: Early Implementation of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations and Health Care in the Perinatal Period","authors":"Laura B. Attanasio PhD ,&nbsp;Kimberley H. Geissler PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.whi.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>More than 40% of U.S. birthing people are covered by Medicaid. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are increasingly common in state Medicaid programs and may influence maternal health, quality of care, and outcomes. However, there has been limited examination of how Medicaid ACOs operate in the context of perinatal care. Our objective was to explore how individuals in ACO leadership have approached program design to address maternal health and how these programs have shaped health care utilization and maternal health from the perspective of postpartum ACO beneficiaries and clinicians.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with three key stakeholder groups in Massachusetts (ACO leaders, maternity care clinicians, and Medicaid ACO members who had given birth within the past 6–24 months) between November 2021 and May 2023. Purposive sampling aimed to achieve variation in geographic location (members and clinicians) and race/ethnicity (members). Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed iteratively using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Principal Findings</h3><div>Thirty-three interviews were conducted: four with ACO leaders, 15 with maternity care clinicians, and 14 with ACO members. Maternity care clinicians did not perceive that ACO implementation had substantially impacted perinatal health care. Interviews with ACO leadership suggested that the lack of perceived impact may be partially explained by competing priorities; the Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs generally did not focus on maternal health during the initial implementation period. Postpartum ACO members were largely unaware of ACOs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lack of explicit attention to the perinatal population in Medicaid financing and delivery system reforms may reduce the potential impact in improving outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48039,"journal":{"name":"Womens Health Issues","volume":"35 2","pages":"Pages 89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Health Issues","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1049386724001269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

More than 40% of U.S. birthing people are covered by Medicaid. Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) are increasingly common in state Medicaid programs and may influence maternal health, quality of care, and outcomes. However, there has been limited examination of how Medicaid ACOs operate in the context of perinatal care. Our objective was to explore how individuals in ACO leadership have approached program design to address maternal health and how these programs have shaped health care utilization and maternal health from the perspective of postpartum ACO beneficiaries and clinicians.

Methods

We conducted virtual semi-structured interviews with three key stakeholder groups in Massachusetts (ACO leaders, maternity care clinicians, and Medicaid ACO members who had given birth within the past 6–24 months) between November 2021 and May 2023. Purposive sampling aimed to achieve variation in geographic location (members and clinicians) and race/ethnicity (members). Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed iteratively using thematic analysis.

Principal Findings

Thirty-three interviews were conducted: four with ACO leaders, 15 with maternity care clinicians, and 14 with ACO members. Maternity care clinicians did not perceive that ACO implementation had substantially impacted perinatal health care. Interviews with ACO leadership suggested that the lack of perceived impact may be partially explained by competing priorities; the Massachusetts Medicaid ACOs generally did not focus on maternal health during the initial implementation period. Postpartum ACO members were largely unaware of ACOs.

Conclusions

Lack of explicit attention to the perinatal population in Medicaid financing and delivery system reforms may reduce the potential impact in improving outcomes.
“在产科方面的事情,它是完全脱节的”:医疗补助责任医疗组织和围产期医疗保健的早期实施。
目标:超过40%的美国产妇享受医疗补助。问责医疗组织(ACOs)在国家医疗补助计划中越来越普遍,并可能影响孕产妇健康、护理质量和结果。然而,关于医疗补助ACOs如何在围产期护理中运作的研究有限。我们的目标是探索ACO领导中的个人如何处理方案设计以解决孕产妇健康问题,以及这些方案如何从产后ACO受益人和临床医生的角度塑造医疗保健利用和孕产妇健康。方法:我们在2021年11月至2023年5月期间对马萨诸塞州的三个关键利益相关者群体(ACO领导,产科护理临床医生和在过去6-24个月内分娩的医疗补助ACO成员)进行了虚拟半结构化访谈。有目的的抽样旨在实现地理位置(成员和临床医生)和种族/民族(成员)的变化。访谈记录,专业转录,并使用主题分析迭代分析。主要发现:共进行了33次访谈,其中4次访谈是针对妇产科医生,15次访谈是针对产科医生,14次访谈是针对妇产科医生。产妇保健临床医生没有意识到ACO的实施对围产期保健产生了重大影响。对ACO领导层的采访表明,缺乏可感知的影响可能部分解释为竞争的优先事项;麻萨诸塞州医疗补助ACOs在最初实施期间一般不注重产妇保健。产后ACOs成员大多不知道ACOs。结论:在医疗补助融资和交付系统改革中缺乏对围产期人口的明确关注可能会降低对改善结果的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: Women"s Health Issues (WHI) is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly, multidisciplinary journal that publishes research and review manuscripts related to women"s health care and policy. As the official journal of the Jacobs Institute of Women"s Health, it is dedicated to improving the health and health care of all women throughout the lifespan and in diverse communities. The journal seeks to inform health services researchers, health care and public health professionals, social scientists, policymakers, and others concerned with women"s health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信