Developing and Validating a User-Friendly Quality Benchmark: Enhancing the Integrity of Online Health Information for Patients and Clinicians.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735241309468
Lubna Daraz, Cicek Dogu
{"title":"Developing and Validating a User-Friendly Quality Benchmark: Enhancing the Integrity of Online Health Information for Patients and Clinicians.","authors":"Lubna Daraz, Cicek Dogu","doi":"10.1177/23743735241309468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality of online health information remains one of the leading causes in combating misinformation for patients and the public. However, assessing online health content is challenging for those without medical expertise. This article briefly outlines the development and validation of an evidence-based online health information evaluation tool. A systematic approach with five phases was adopted: (1) synthesizing the current state of the reliability of online health information, (2) conducting content analysis of existing quality assessment tools, (3) drafting a comprehensive list of quality criteria, (4) developing and validating a quality benchmark, and (5) disseminating the results. Collaborative input from healthcare providers, patients, caregivers, and the public developed and validated a quality benchmark. The quality benchmark consists of 5 quality criteria and 8 accompanying descriptions that define each quality criterion. A printable version of the benchmark is provided in the article to facilitate easy implementation by both patients and healthcare providers. The benchmark is recommended for use and intended to empower patients with a skill set to navigate through online misinformation, facilitating access to credible health information and promoting improved health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735241309468"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241309468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality of online health information remains one of the leading causes in combating misinformation for patients and the public. However, assessing online health content is challenging for those without medical expertise. This article briefly outlines the development and validation of an evidence-based online health information evaluation tool. A systematic approach with five phases was adopted: (1) synthesizing the current state of the reliability of online health information, (2) conducting content analysis of existing quality assessment tools, (3) drafting a comprehensive list of quality criteria, (4) developing and validating a quality benchmark, and (5) disseminating the results. Collaborative input from healthcare providers, patients, caregivers, and the public developed and validated a quality benchmark. The quality benchmark consists of 5 quality criteria and 8 accompanying descriptions that define each quality criterion. A printable version of the benchmark is provided in the article to facilitate easy implementation by both patients and healthcare providers. The benchmark is recommended for use and intended to empower patients with a skill set to navigate through online misinformation, facilitating access to credible health information and promoting improved health outcomes.

在线健康信息的质量仍然是为患者和公众消除错误信息的主要原因之一。然而,对于没有医学专业知识的人来说,评估在线健康内容具有挑战性。本文简要概述了循证在线健康信息评估工具的开发和验证过程。我们采用了一种系统的方法,分为五个阶段:(1)综合在线健康信息可靠性的现状,(2)对现有质量评估工具进行内容分析,(3)起草一份全面的质量标准清单,(4)开发并验证质量基准,以及(5)传播结果。来自医疗服务提供者、患者、护理人员和公众的合作意见共同制定并验证了质量基准。该质量基准包括 5 个质量标准和 8 个附带说明,对每个质量标准进行了定义。文章中提供了该基准的可打印版本,以方便患者和医疗服务提供者实施。推荐使用该基准,目的是让患者掌握一套技能,以浏览网上的错误信息,方便获取可信的健康信息,促进改善健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信