Individual versus group exercise effect on youth physical activity levels: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.9 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002024
Dario Novak, Marko Čule, Jinseo Kim, Rockli Kim, S V Subramanian
{"title":"Individual versus group exercise effect on youth physical activity levels: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Dario Novak, Marko Čule, Jinseo Kim, Rockli Kim, S V Subramanian","doi":"10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore the effects of two different types of exercise (individual vs group) on physical activity (PA) among Croatian university students.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 976 university students between the ages of 19 and 20 years (age 19.4±1.1 years, body mass index 21.9±2.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) were randomly assigned to either the control group (individual exercise) (n=504) or the intervention group, which received group exercise (n=472). Pre- and postintervention measures included: self-rated health, parents' occupation, psychological distress, nutritional status and PA levels. The overall intervention effect was estimated using linear regression method, and heterogeneity in intervention effect was assessed by modelling complex variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group-based exercise intervention significantly increased total PA time by more than 10 metabolic equivalents (METS) hours per week compared with individual-based exercise control group. When considering different types of activities, the intervention effect was stronger for vigorous activity (increase by almost 6 METS hours per week) than walking activity (2.5 METS hours per week). The change in moderate activity level was not significant after covariate adjustment. In addition, intervention was also effective in reducing sedentary hours. Finally, when complex level-1 heterogeneity was modelled by intervention status, we found substantially larger variance in the intervention group compared with the controls, indicating presence of heterogeneous treatment effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study discusses major implications of different ways of exercising among youths from a health, educational and sport perspective. Intervention and policies that leverage school social capital might serve as an avenue for health promotion in youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":47417,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"e002024"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore the effects of two different types of exercise (individual vs group) on physical activity (PA) among Croatian university students.

Methods: A total of 976 university students between the ages of 19 and 20 years (age 19.4±1.1 years, body mass index 21.9±2.9 kg/m2) were randomly assigned to either the control group (individual exercise) (n=504) or the intervention group, which received group exercise (n=472). Pre- and postintervention measures included: self-rated health, parents' occupation, psychological distress, nutritional status and PA levels. The overall intervention effect was estimated using linear regression method, and heterogeneity in intervention effect was assessed by modelling complex variance.

Results: Group-based exercise intervention significantly increased total PA time by more than 10 metabolic equivalents (METS) hours per week compared with individual-based exercise control group. When considering different types of activities, the intervention effect was stronger for vigorous activity (increase by almost 6 METS hours per week) than walking activity (2.5 METS hours per week). The change in moderate activity level was not significant after covariate adjustment. In addition, intervention was also effective in reducing sedentary hours. Finally, when complex level-1 heterogeneity was modelled by intervention status, we found substantially larger variance in the intervention group compared with the controls, indicating presence of heterogeneous treatment effect.

Conclusions: This study discusses major implications of different ways of exercising among youths from a health, educational and sport perspective. Intervention and policies that leverage school social capital might serve as an avenue for health promotion in youth.

目的:探讨两种不同类型的运动(个人运动与集体运动)对克罗地亚大学生体育锻炼的影响:探讨两种不同类型的运动(个人运动与集体运动)对克罗地亚大学生体育活动的影响:共有 976 名 19 至 20 岁的大学生(年龄为 19.4±1.1 岁,体重指数为 21.9±2.9 kg/m2)被随机分配到对照组(个人锻炼)(504 人)或干预组(472 人)。干预前后的测量指标包括:自评健康状况、父母职业、心理困扰、营养状况和 PA 水平。采用线性回归法估算总体干预效果,并通过复杂方差模型评估干预效果的异质性:结果:与个人运动对照组相比,集体运动干预大大增加了每周总运动时间,增加幅度超过 10 个代谢当量(METS)小时。如果考虑到不同类型的活动,剧烈活动(每周增加近 6 METS 小时)的干预效果要强于步行活动(每周 2.5 METS 小时)。经过协变量调整后,中度活动量的变化并不显著。此外,干预还能有效减少久坐时间。最后,当按干预状态建立复杂的一级异质性模型时,我们发现干预组与对照组相比,差异显著增大,表明存在异质性治疗效果:本研究从健康、教育和体育角度探讨了青少年不同锻炼方式的主要影响。利用学校社会资本的干预措施和政策可作为促进青少年健康的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
106
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信