Using ethnomethodology to explore how nurses, in an acute setting, make sense of care.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING
Ray Healy
{"title":"Using ethnomethodology to explore how nurses, in an acute setting, make sense of care.","authors":"Ray Healy","doi":"10.1177/17449871241286757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how nurses understand and make sense of multiple definitions of nursing practice.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The study used ethnomethodology to explore how nurses in an acute hospital ward shape, construct and sensemake nursing practice in their everyday worlds. Multiple data sources were used to triangulate different constructions of reality and generate a broader understanding, including non-participant shadowing of nurses during eight shifts, semi-structured interviews with six registered nurses and a review of the nursing section of the hospital's Electronic Patient Record system. Data were collected in two surgical wards in an acute hospital (2019-2020). Data were iteratively coded and refined through all stages of the study.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Nurses make sense of conflicting expectations by creating multiple realities which they apply in different situations to structure how they deliver care. This finding suggests that nurses move seamlessly and unknowingly through these created realities, supported by using specific but discrete languages that they can effortlessly adopt. A consequence is that no single model or theory contains all the realities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study goes some way to explain the described difference between work-as-imagined and work-as-done. Failure to acknowledge the multiple realities constructed in practice during pre-registration education may explain the theory-practice gap that many new graduates experience and why anticipated outcomes described in research projects might not be realised in everyday practice.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Nursing practice is not governed by a single theory or model, and nurses make pragmatic transitions between different expectations. Recognition of this is critical to effective planning and leadership of the nursing resource. Using electronic records as a single measure of nursing work has the potential to create a bias towards one reality and thereby render other aspects of nursing value invisible. Failure to embrace the totality of nursing practice may impede the delivery of anticipated patient outcomes and system efficiencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"17449871241286757"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780608/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871241286757","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To explore how nurses understand and make sense of multiple definitions of nursing practice.

Methodology: The study used ethnomethodology to explore how nurses in an acute hospital ward shape, construct and sensemake nursing practice in their everyday worlds. Multiple data sources were used to triangulate different constructions of reality and generate a broader understanding, including non-participant shadowing of nurses during eight shifts, semi-structured interviews with six registered nurses and a review of the nursing section of the hospital's Electronic Patient Record system. Data were collected in two surgical wards in an acute hospital (2019-2020). Data were iteratively coded and refined through all stages of the study.

Findings: Nurses make sense of conflicting expectations by creating multiple realities which they apply in different situations to structure how they deliver care. This finding suggests that nurses move seamlessly and unknowingly through these created realities, supported by using specific but discrete languages that they can effortlessly adopt. A consequence is that no single model or theory contains all the realities.

Conclusion: This study goes some way to explain the described difference between work-as-imagined and work-as-done. Failure to acknowledge the multiple realities constructed in practice during pre-registration education may explain the theory-practice gap that many new graduates experience and why anticipated outcomes described in research projects might not be realised in everyday practice.

Implications: Nursing practice is not governed by a single theory or model, and nurses make pragmatic transitions between different expectations. Recognition of this is critical to effective planning and leadership of the nursing resource. Using electronic records as a single measure of nursing work has the potential to create a bias towards one reality and thereby render other aspects of nursing value invisible. Failure to embrace the totality of nursing practice may impede the delivery of anticipated patient outcomes and system efficiencies.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信