Sociodemographic, political, and policy contexts of cancer care: A comparative analysis of countries with the highest survival rates

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Alejandra Fuentes-García , Carla Flores-Figueroa , Alondra Castillo-Delgado
{"title":"Sociodemographic, political, and policy contexts of cancer care: A comparative analysis of countries with the highest survival rates","authors":"Alejandra Fuentes-García ,&nbsp;Carla Flores-Figueroa ,&nbsp;Alondra Castillo-Delgado","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100559","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality, with 20 million new cases and 10 million deaths in 2022 (WHO). Despite advances in detection and treatment, structural inequalities affect exposure to risk factors and healthcare access. This study compares the cancer care policy contexts of five countries with the highest five-year survival rates.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This qualitative review examines cancer care policies in Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Belgium, and Japan countries through a critical comparative approach. Data was gathered from official and international documents, focusing on four domains: socio-demographic characteristics, socio-political traditions, health systems, and cancer policies.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The countries share high life expectancy, and education, while face similar population challenges. Australia and Canada have implemented telemedicine and mobile services to address the needs of dispersed rural populations, while Belgium and Japan ensure equitable access in dense areas. All countries integrate public-private partnerships, and adapt governance structures to contexts, under a strong welfare state with universal health coverage. Cancer policies are characterised by participatory processes that emphasise equity, accessibility, and innovation</div></div><div><h3>Policy summary</h3><div>The study identifies consistent patterns in cancer care policies, highlighting contributing factors to high survival rates. Participatory and bottom-up policy design enables responses to complex contexts. Strategies focus on financial sustainability, equity, cultural relevance, and territorial adaptation. An innovative framework for assessing cancer care policy contexts is introduced.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"43 ","pages":"Article 100559"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325000037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cancer remains a leading cause of mortality, with 20 million new cases and 10 million deaths in 2022 (WHO). Despite advances in detection and treatment, structural inequalities affect exposure to risk factors and healthcare access. This study compares the cancer care policy contexts of five countries with the highest five-year survival rates.

Methods

This qualitative review examines cancer care policies in Australia, Canada, Costa Rica, Belgium, and Japan countries through a critical comparative approach. Data was gathered from official and international documents, focusing on four domains: socio-demographic characteristics, socio-political traditions, health systems, and cancer policies.

Results

The countries share high life expectancy, and education, while face similar population challenges. Australia and Canada have implemented telemedicine and mobile services to address the needs of dispersed rural populations, while Belgium and Japan ensure equitable access in dense areas. All countries integrate public-private partnerships, and adapt governance structures to contexts, under a strong welfare state with universal health coverage. Cancer policies are characterised by participatory processes that emphasise equity, accessibility, and innovation

Policy summary

The study identifies consistent patterns in cancer care policies, highlighting contributing factors to high survival rates. Participatory and bottom-up policy design enables responses to complex contexts. Strategies focus on financial sustainability, equity, cultural relevance, and territorial adaptation. An innovative framework for assessing cancer care policy contexts is introduced.
“癌症治疗的社会人口、政治和政策背景:最高存活率国家的比较分析”。
导言:癌症仍然是导致死亡的主要原因,2022年有2000万新病例和1000万死亡病例(世卫组织)。尽管在检测和治疗方面取得了进展,但结构性不平等影响了接触风险因素和获得医疗保健的机会。这项研究比较了五个五年生存率最高的国家的癌症护理政策背景。方法:本定性综述通过批判性比较方法考察了澳大利亚、加拿大、哥斯达黎加、比利时和日本国家的癌症护理政策。从官方和国际文件中收集数据,重点关注四个领域:社会人口特征、社会政治传统、卫生系统和癌症政策。结果:这两个国家的人均寿命和教育水平都很高,但面临着相似的人口挑战。澳大利亚和加拿大实施了远程医疗和移动服务,以满足分散的农村人口的需求,而比利时和日本确保在人口密集地区公平获得服务。在全民健康覆盖的强大福利国家下,所有国家都整合了公私伙伴关系,并根据具体情况调整治理结构。摘要:该研究确定了癌症护理政策的一致模式,强调了导致高存活率的因素。参与式和自下而上的政策设计能够对复杂的情况作出反应。战略侧重于财务可持续性、公平性、文化相关性和地域适应性。介绍了评估癌症护理政策背景的创新框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信