Using Relative Distribution Methods to Study Economic Polarization Across Categories and Contexts.

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Sociological Methodology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25
Siwei Cheng, Andrew Levine, Ananda Martin-Caughey
{"title":"Using Relative Distribution Methods to Study Economic Polarization Across Categories and Contexts<sup />.","authors":"Siwei Cheng, Andrew Levine, Ananda Martin-Caughey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In addition to overall dispersion, the <i>distributional shape</i> of economic status has attracted growing attention in the inequality literature. Economic <i>polarization</i> is a specific form of distributional change, characterized by a shrinking middle of the distribution and a growing top and bottom, with potentially important and unique social consequences. Building on relative distribution methods and drawing from the literature on job polarization, we develop an approach for analyzing economic polarization at the individual level. Our method has three useful features. First, it offers intuitive and flexible measurement of economic polarization both between and within categories. Second, it helps disentangle two potential sources of economic polarization: <i>compositional change</i>, which involves changes to the allocation of workers across categories, and <i>relative economic status change</i>, which involves changes to the allocation of economic rewards between individuals. Third, it enables researchers to uncover and examine potential heterogeneity in economic polarization, for example across occupations, geographic units, demographic and educational groups, and firms. We demonstrate the utility of our approach through two empirical applications: (1) an analysis of trends in wage polarization between and within occupations and (2) an examination of geographic variation in income polarization.</p>","PeriodicalId":48140,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Methodology","volume":"55 1","pages":"91-120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In addition to overall dispersion, the distributional shape of economic status has attracted growing attention in the inequality literature. Economic polarization is a specific form of distributional change, characterized by a shrinking middle of the distribution and a growing top and bottom, with potentially important and unique social consequences. Building on relative distribution methods and drawing from the literature on job polarization, we develop an approach for analyzing economic polarization at the individual level. Our method has three useful features. First, it offers intuitive and flexible measurement of economic polarization both between and within categories. Second, it helps disentangle two potential sources of economic polarization: compositional change, which involves changes to the allocation of workers across categories, and relative economic status change, which involves changes to the allocation of economic rewards between individuals. Third, it enables researchers to uncover and examine potential heterogeneity in economic polarization, for example across occupations, geographic units, demographic and educational groups, and firms. We demonstrate the utility of our approach through two empirical applications: (1) an analysis of trends in wage polarization between and within occupations and (2) an examination of geographic variation in income polarization.

用相对分布方法研究不同类别和背景下的经济极化。
除了整体的分散,经济地位的分配形态在不平等的文献中也引起了越来越多的关注。经济两极分化是分配变化的一种特殊形式,其特点是分配的中间部分缩小,顶层和底层扩大,具有潜在的重要和独特的社会后果。在相对分配方法的基础上,借鉴有关工作两极分化的文献,我们发展了一种分析个人层面经济两极分化的方法。我们的方法有三个有用的特点。首先,它为类别之间和类别内的经济两极分化提供了直观和灵活的衡量方法。其次,它有助于理清经济两极分化的两个潜在来源:构成变化,涉及到跨类别工人分配的变化,以及相对经济地位的变化,涉及到个人之间经济报酬分配的变化。第三,它使研究人员能够发现和检查经济两极分化的潜在异质性,例如职业、地理单位、人口和教育群体以及公司之间的异质性。我们通过两个实证应用证明了我们的方法的实用性:(1)分析职业之间和职业内部的工资两极分化趋势;(2)检查收入两极分化的地理差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: Sociological Methodology is a compendium of new and sometimes controversial advances in social science methodology. Contributions come from diverse areas and have something useful -- and often surprising -- to say about a wide range of topics ranging from legal and ethical issues surrounding data collection to the methodology of theory construction. In short, Sociological Methodology holds something of value -- and an interesting mix of lively controversy, too -- for nearly everyone who participates in the enterprise of sociological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信