Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Medications Alter Outcomes of Spine Surgery: A Study Among Over 15,000 Patients.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005283
Joshua M Wiener, Parshva A Sanghvi, Katelyn Vlastaris, Thomas Mroz, Jonathan Belding, David C Kaelber, Thomas Olson, Kevin P Francis, John S Adams, Nicholas Bernthal, William L Sheppard
{"title":"Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Medications Alter Outcomes of Spine Surgery: A Study Among Over 15,000 Patients.","authors":"Joshua M Wiener, Parshva A Sanghvi, Katelyn Vlastaris, Thomas Mroz, Jonathan Belding, David C Kaelber, Thomas Olson, Kevin P Francis, John S Adams, Nicholas Bernthal, William L Sheppard","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the relationship between perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and postoperative outcomes after spinal fusion in obese and diabetic patient populations.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>GLP-1 RAs have been shown to be beneficial when used perioperatively in clinical orthopedic arthroplasty literature. Minimal evidence exists showing efficacy with respect to spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, multi-center study accessed the TriNetX platform, using the research database to identify diabetic patients who underwent spinal fusion between 2008 and 2022. Cohorts were created based on body mass index and GLP-1 RA usage. Propensity score matching was employed to create balanced cohorts utilizing body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, surgical intervention, as well as other demographic characteristics. Orthopedic outcomes were compared between GLP-1 RA users and non-users. The primary outcomes included postoperative infection, readmission, revision surgery, and quality of life metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, the study cohort consisted of 2263 patients, with 1560 classified as obese. GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly reduced postoperative infection rates [obese: HR = 0.168 (0.086, 0.328), not obese: HR = 0.250 (0.102, 0.612)], fewer revisions [obese: HR = 0.505 (0.368, 0.693), not obese: HR = 0.439 (0.272, 0.708)], decreased postoperative readmission rates [obese: HR = 0.283 (0.243, 0.329), not obese: HR = 0.241 (0.193, 0.301)], and reduced mobility abnormalities [obese: HR = 0.355 (0.230, 0.549), not obese: HR = 0.508 (0.269, 0.959)]. No significant differences were observed in rates of fracture rates between GLP-1 RA users and non-users.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>GLP-1 RA use in spinal fusion patients was associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including lower infection rates, fewer revisions, and better quality of life metrics. These findings suggest that GLP-1 RAs may be a valuable adjunctive therapy in managing surgical outcomes in diabetic and obese patients undergoing spinal fusion. Further prospective and animal-based studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":"871-880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005283","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: To investigate the relationship between perioperative glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and postoperative outcomes after spinal fusion in obese and diabetic patient populations.

Background: GLP-1 RAs have been shown to be beneficial when used perioperatively in clinical orthopedic arthroplasty literature. Minimal evidence exists showing efficacy with respect to spinal fusion.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, multi-center study accessed the TriNetX platform, using the research database to identify diabetic patients who underwent spinal fusion between 2008 and 2022. Cohorts were created based on body mass index and GLP-1 RA usage. Propensity score matching was employed to create balanced cohorts utilizing body mass index, hemoglobin A1c, surgical intervention, as well as other demographic characteristics. Orthopedic outcomes were compared between GLP-1 RA users and non-users. The primary outcomes included postoperative infection, readmission, revision surgery, and quality of life metrics.

Results: After matching, the study cohort consisted of 2263 patients, with 1560 classified as obese. GLP-1 RA use was associated with significantly reduced postoperative infection rates [obese: HR = 0.168 (0.086, 0.328), not obese: HR = 0.250 (0.102, 0.612)], fewer revisions [obese: HR = 0.505 (0.368, 0.693), not obese: HR = 0.439 (0.272, 0.708)], decreased postoperative readmission rates [obese: HR = 0.283 (0.243, 0.329), not obese: HR = 0.241 (0.193, 0.301)], and reduced mobility abnormalities [obese: HR = 0.355 (0.230, 0.549), not obese: HR = 0.508 (0.269, 0.959)]. No significant differences were observed in rates of fracture rates between GLP-1 RA users and non-users.

Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use in spinal fusion patients was associated with improved postoperative outcomes, including lower infection rates, fewer revisions, and better quality of life metrics. These findings suggest that GLP-1 RAs may be a valuable adjunctive therapy in managing surgical outcomes in diabetic and obese patients undergoing spinal fusion. Further prospective and animal-based studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms.

GLP-1受体激动剂药物改变脊柱手术结果:一项超过15,000例患者的研究
研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:探讨肥胖和糖尿病患者脊柱融合术后围手术期胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)与术后预后的关系。背景资料总结:临床骨科关节置换术文献显示,围手术期使用GLP-1 RAs是有益的。很少有证据显示脊柱融合术的疗效。材料和方法:这项回顾性的多中心研究访问了TriNetX平台,使用研究数据库识别2008年至2022年间接受脊柱融合术的糖尿病患者。根据身体质量指数(BMI)和GLP-1 RA的使用情况创建队列。采用倾向评分匹配,利用BMI、血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)、手术干预以及其他人口统计学特征创建平衡队列。比较GLP-1 RA使用者和非使用者的骨科结果。主要结局包括术后感染、再入院、翻修手术和生活质量指标。结果:匹配后,研究队列包括2263例患者,其中1560例被归类为肥胖。GLP-1 RA的使用显著降低了术后感染率(肥胖者:HR=0.168(0.086, 0.328),非肥胖者:HR=0.250(0.102, 0.612)),减少了术后再入院率(肥胖者:HR=0.505(0.368, 0.693),非肥胖者:HR=0.439(0.272, 0.708)),降低了术后再入院率(肥胖者:HR=0.283(0.243, 0.329),非肥胖者:HR=0.241(0.193, 0.301)),减少了活动异常(肥胖者:HR=0.355(0.230, 0.549),非肥胖者:HR=0.508(0.269, 0.959))。GLP-1 RA服用者和非服用者的骨折率无显著差异。结论:GLP-1 RA用于脊柱融合术患者可改善术后预后,包括更低的感染率、更少的翻修和更好的生活质量指标。这些发现表明,GLP-1 RAs可能是一种有价值的辅助治疗方法,可用于糖尿病和肥胖患者脊柱融合术的手术结果。需要进一步的前瞻性和基于动物的研究来证实这些发现并探索潜在的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信