Herd-level seroprevalence, molecular prevalence, and trends of Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in cattle worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Veterinary World Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.14202/vetworld.2024.2811-2828
Adithep Konputtar, Nguyen Hoai Nam, Sarinya Rerkyusuke, Chaiyapas Thamrongyoswittayakul, Suvaluk Seesupa, Montira Yossapol, Peerapol Sukon
{"title":"Herd-level seroprevalence, molecular prevalence, and trends of <i>Coxiella burnetii</i> (Q fever) in cattle worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Adithep Konputtar, Nguyen Hoai Nam, Sarinya Rerkyusuke, Chaiyapas Thamrongyoswittayakul, Suvaluk Seesupa, Montira Yossapol, Peerapol Sukon","doi":"10.14202/vetworld.2024.2811-2828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Cattle are the reservoir host of <i>Coxiella burnetii</i>, a causative agent of Q fever. Pooling herd-level prevalence data from individual studies would help determine the global prevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle herds. This study aimed to estimate the global herd-level seroprevalence and molecular prevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle, explore sources of heterogeneity, and determine trends and cumulative evidence of the pooled prevalence over time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science and then screened for possible inclusion. A random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses. Subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to explore some sources of heterogeneity associated with the pooled prevalence and to determine the trends of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle herds over the study years (1961-2020). A cumulative meta-analysis was used to determine the cumulative evidence of the pooled prevalence over the publication years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1541 citations, 86 studies with 38,057 cattle herds from 42 countries on six continents were included in the meta-analysis. The global herd-level seroprevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle was estimated to be 44.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.9%-51.1%), with high heterogeneity among the included studies. The herd-level seroprevalence was significantly higher in dairy than in beef cattle herds (49.0% [95% CI: 41.9%-56.2%] vs. 14.5% [95% CI: 5.8%-32.1%], respectively). The global herd-level molecular prevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle was estimated to be 32.3% (95% CI: 25.3%-40.01%), with high heterogeneity among the included studies. Herd-level molecular prevalence was significantly different among continents. The herd-level molecular prevalence ranged from 12.8% (95% CI: 7.1%-21.9%) in Asia to 70.0% (95% CI: 36.3%-90.5%) in North America. Regarding trends, the herd-level seroprevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle did not change significantlyover the study years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The global herd-level seroprevalence and herd-level molecular prevalence of <i>C. burnetii</i> in cattle were high, estimated at 44% and 32%, respectively. The herd-level seroprevalence trend did not significantly change over time. This result indicates that cattle remain a major reservoir host for <i>C. burnetii</i> and pose a potential risk to human health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23587,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary World","volume":"17 12","pages":"2811-2828"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2024.2811-2828","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: Cattle are the reservoir host of Coxiella burnetii, a causative agent of Q fever. Pooling herd-level prevalence data from individual studies would help determine the global prevalence of C. burnetii in cattle herds. This study aimed to estimate the global herd-level seroprevalence and molecular prevalence of C. burnetii in cattle, explore sources of heterogeneity, and determine trends and cumulative evidence of the pooled prevalence over time.

Materials and methods: Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science and then screened for possible inclusion. A random-effects model was used for all meta-analyses. Subgroup meta-analysis and meta-regression were used to explore some sources of heterogeneity associated with the pooled prevalence and to determine the trends of C. burnetii in cattle herds over the study years (1961-2020). A cumulative meta-analysis was used to determine the cumulative evidence of the pooled prevalence over the publication years.

Results: Of the 1541 citations, 86 studies with 38,057 cattle herds from 42 countries on six continents were included in the meta-analysis. The global herd-level seroprevalence of C. burnetii in cattle was estimated to be 44.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37.9%-51.1%), with high heterogeneity among the included studies. The herd-level seroprevalence was significantly higher in dairy than in beef cattle herds (49.0% [95% CI: 41.9%-56.2%] vs. 14.5% [95% CI: 5.8%-32.1%], respectively). The global herd-level molecular prevalence of C. burnetii in cattle was estimated to be 32.3% (95% CI: 25.3%-40.01%), with high heterogeneity among the included studies. Herd-level molecular prevalence was significantly different among continents. The herd-level molecular prevalence ranged from 12.8% (95% CI: 7.1%-21.9%) in Asia to 70.0% (95% CI: 36.3%-90.5%) in North America. Regarding trends, the herd-level seroprevalence of C. burnetii in cattle did not change significantlyover the study years.

Conclusion: The global herd-level seroprevalence and herd-level molecular prevalence of C. burnetii in cattle were high, estimated at 44% and 32%, respectively. The herd-level seroprevalence trend did not significantly change over time. This result indicates that cattle remain a major reservoir host for C. burnetii and pose a potential risk to human health.

牛群水平的伯纳氏克希菌(Q热)血清阳性率、分子流行率和趋势:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景与目的:牛是Q热病原菌伯氏克希菌的宿主。汇集来自个别研究的牛群水平流行数据将有助于确定牛群中伯纳蒂菌的全球流行情况。本研究旨在估计全球牛群水平的伯纳蒂杆菌血清阳性率和分子流行率,探索异质性来源,并确定趋势和累积证据。材料和方法:从PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science中检索相关研究,然后筛选可能的纳入。所有meta分析均采用随机效应模型。亚组荟萃分析和荟萃回归分析用于探索与总患病率相关的一些异质性来源,并确定研究年份(1961-2020年)牛群中布氏梭菌的趋势。累积荟萃分析用于确定在发表年份汇总患病率的累积证据。结果:在1541次引用中,86项研究涉及6大洲42个国家的38,057头牛群,被纳入meta分析。据估计,全球牛群水平的伯纳蒂杆菌血清患病率为44.4%(95%置信区间[CI], 37.9%-51.1%),纳入的研究之间存在高度异质性。奶牛群的血清阳性率显著高于肉牛群(分别为49.0% [95% CI: 41.9%-56.2%]和14.5% [95% CI: 5.8%-32.1%])。据估计,全球牛群中布氏杆菌的分子流行率为32.3% (95% CI: 25.3%-40.01%),在纳入的研究中存在高度异质性。各大洲之间群体水平的分子流行率差异显著。群体水平的分子患病率从亚洲的12.8% (95% CI: 7.1%-21.9%)到北美的70.0% (95% CI: 36.3%-90.5%)不等。关于趋势,牛群水平的伯氏杆菌血清患病率在研究期间没有显著变化。结论:全球牛布氏杆菌血清阳性率和分子流行率较高,估计分别为44%和32%。随着时间的推移,群体水平的血清阳性率趋势没有显著变化。这一结果表明,牛仍然是伯氏杆菌的主要宿主,并对人类健康构成潜在风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Veterinary World
Veterinary World Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
317
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary World publishes high quality papers focusing on Veterinary and Animal Science. The fields of study are bacteriology, parasitology, pathology, virology, immunology, mycology, public health, biotechnology, meat science, fish diseases, nutrition, gynecology, genetics, wildlife, laboratory animals, animal models of human infections, prion diseases and epidemiology. Studies on zoonotic and emerging infections are highly appreciated. Review articles are highly appreciated. All articles published by Veterinary World are made freely and permanently accessible online. All articles to Veterinary World are posted online immediately as they are ready for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信