Nutritional carryover effects of the previous plane of nutrition of crossbred Angus steers affects freshwater intake, animal performance, and water and feed efficiency.
Aghata Elins Moreira da Silva, Arturo Macias Franco, Felipe Henrique de Moura, Aaron Norris, Kelli Noelle Bangert, Leilson Rocha Bezerra, Lucas Gimenez Mota, Mozart Alves Fonseca
{"title":"Nutritional carryover effects of the previous plane of nutrition of crossbred Angus steers affects freshwater intake, animal performance, and water and feed efficiency.","authors":"Aghata Elins Moreira da Silva, Arturo Macias Franco, Felipe Henrique de Moura, Aaron Norris, Kelli Noelle Bangert, Leilson Rocha Bezerra, Lucas Gimenez Mota, Mozart Alves Fonseca","doi":"10.1093/tas/txaf006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated how the backgrounding diet can affect water intake, animal performance and water and feed efficiency of steers fed finishing diets based on grains or forages. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298 ± 10.2 kg) were fed during backgrounding either a moderate (MP, <i>n</i> = 12; triticale hay only, 9.1%crude protein [CP], 1.07 Mcal/kg net energy available for maintenance [NEm], and 0.52 Mcal/kg net energy available for gain [NEg]) or high plane of nutrition (HP, <i>n</i> = 12; 85% alfalfa hay and 15% beardless wheat hay, 12.62%CP, 1.23 Mcal/kg NEm, and 0.66 Mcal/kg NEg) during the background phase (85 d). After this period, steers were assigned to two finishing phase groups containing half of the animals from each backgrounding diets. During the finishing phase, animals were fed either a forage-based (Alfalfa hay; CP: 20.8% DM, NEm: 1.47 Mcal/kg, NEg: 0.88 Mcal/kg) or a grain-based diet (80% whole corn and 20% wheat hay; CP: 10.6% DM, NEm: 1.96 Mcal/kg, NEg: 1.31 Mcal/kg). There was no interaction between the effects of the previous plane of nutrition [(moderate (MP) or high (HP)] and finishing diets (forage or grain-fed) on any of the variables studied (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Animals backgrounded on MP were lighter and had a lower DMI when compared with HP (<i>P</i> < 0.01). However, no differences were observed on the drinking water intake (DWI) between MP and HP (<i>P</i> > 0.05). HP animals were more efficient in gross water efficiency (<i>P</i> < 0.01), but less efficient on residual feed intake (<i>P</i> < 0.05), compared to MP animals. During the finishing phase, forage fed animals had a greater DMI and DWI compared with grain-fed animals (<i>P</i> < 0.01), however, no differences were observed on the final BW (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Grain-fed animals were more efficient for water and feed intake and had a greater marbling score (<i>P</i> < 0.01) compared to forage-fed. Animals fed on HP and finished in a grain-fed diet had the least DWI (<i>P</i> < 0.05) and greatest body condition score (<i>P</i> < 0.05), marbling score (<i>P</i> < 0.01) and rib depth (<i>P</i> < 0.05). In the first 20 d of the finishing period, the previous plane affected the variables ADG, DMI, CPi, and DWI (as kg DMI and CP) in the finishing plane. Altogether, our results highlight the individual effects of backgrounding and finishing systems on DWI and the efficiency of finishing animals, as well as the importance of providing adequate nutrition during the earlier stages of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":23272,"journal":{"name":"Translational Animal Science","volume":"9 ","pages":"txaf006"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786216/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Animal Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaf006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated how the backgrounding diet can affect water intake, animal performance and water and feed efficiency of steers fed finishing diets based on grains or forages. Twenty-four crossbred Angus steers (298 ± 10.2 kg) were fed during backgrounding either a moderate (MP, n = 12; triticale hay only, 9.1%crude protein [CP], 1.07 Mcal/kg net energy available for maintenance [NEm], and 0.52 Mcal/kg net energy available for gain [NEg]) or high plane of nutrition (HP, n = 12; 85% alfalfa hay and 15% beardless wheat hay, 12.62%CP, 1.23 Mcal/kg NEm, and 0.66 Mcal/kg NEg) during the background phase (85 d). After this period, steers were assigned to two finishing phase groups containing half of the animals from each backgrounding diets. During the finishing phase, animals were fed either a forage-based (Alfalfa hay; CP: 20.8% DM, NEm: 1.47 Mcal/kg, NEg: 0.88 Mcal/kg) or a grain-based diet (80% whole corn and 20% wheat hay; CP: 10.6% DM, NEm: 1.96 Mcal/kg, NEg: 1.31 Mcal/kg). There was no interaction between the effects of the previous plane of nutrition [(moderate (MP) or high (HP)] and finishing diets (forage or grain-fed) on any of the variables studied (P > 0.05). Animals backgrounded on MP were lighter and had a lower DMI when compared with HP (P < 0.01). However, no differences were observed on the drinking water intake (DWI) between MP and HP (P > 0.05). HP animals were more efficient in gross water efficiency (P < 0.01), but less efficient on residual feed intake (P < 0.05), compared to MP animals. During the finishing phase, forage fed animals had a greater DMI and DWI compared with grain-fed animals (P < 0.01), however, no differences were observed on the final BW (P > 0.05). Grain-fed animals were more efficient for water and feed intake and had a greater marbling score (P < 0.01) compared to forage-fed. Animals fed on HP and finished in a grain-fed diet had the least DWI (P < 0.05) and greatest body condition score (P < 0.05), marbling score (P < 0.01) and rib depth (P < 0.05). In the first 20 d of the finishing period, the previous plane affected the variables ADG, DMI, CPi, and DWI (as kg DMI and CP) in the finishing plane. Altogether, our results highlight the individual effects of backgrounding and finishing systems on DWI and the efficiency of finishing animals, as well as the importance of providing adequate nutrition during the earlier stages of life.
期刊介绍:
Translational Animal Science (TAS) is the first open access-open review animal science journal, encompassing a broad scope of research topics in animal science. TAS focuses on translating basic science to innovation, and validation of these innovations by various segments of the allied animal industry. Readers of TAS will typically represent education, industry, and government, including research, teaching, administration, extension, management, quality assurance, product development, and technical services. Those interested in TAS typically include animal breeders, economists, embryologists, engineers, food scientists, geneticists, microbiologists, nutritionists, veterinarians, physiologists, processors, public health professionals, and others with an interest in animal production and applied aspects of animal sciences.