The impact of channel density, inverse solutions, connectivity metrics and calibration errors on OPM-MEG connectivity analysis: A simulation study

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 NEUROIMAGING
Shengjie Qi , Xinda Song , Le Jia , Hongyu Cui , Yuchen Suo , Tengyue Long , Zhendong Wu , Xiaolin Ning
{"title":"The impact of channel density, inverse solutions, connectivity metrics and calibration errors on OPM-MEG connectivity analysis: A simulation study","authors":"Shengjie Qi ,&nbsp;Xinda Song ,&nbsp;Le Jia ,&nbsp;Hongyu Cui ,&nbsp;Yuchen Suo ,&nbsp;Tengyue Long ,&nbsp;Zhendong Wu ,&nbsp;Xiaolin Ning","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have rapidly developed in the fields of brain function, health, and disease. Functional connectivity analysis related to the resting-state has gained popularity as a field of research in recent years. Several studies have attempted to use OPM-based MEG (OPM-MEG) for brain network estimation research; however, the choice of source connectivity analysis pipeline may lead to outcome variability. Several methods and related parameters must be selected carefully at each step of the analysis. Therefore, this study assessed the effect of such analytical variability on the OPM-MEG connectivity analysis by conducting simulations. Synthetic MEG data corresponding to two default mode networks (DMN) with six or ten DMN regions were generated using the Gaussian Graphical Spectral (GGS) model. Six intersensor spacings were constructed, and six inverse algorithms and six functional connectivity measures were selected to assess their impact on the network reconstruction accuracy. Three potential sources of error – errors in the sensor gain, crosstalk, and angular errors of the sensitive axis of the OPM – were also assessed. Analytical variability with regard to the tested intersensor spacings, inverse solutions, and functional connectivity measures led to high result variability. Crosstalk exerted a significant impact on the accuracy, which may lead to network reconstruction failure. The accuracy improvement caused by an increase in the sensor density may be reduced by gain and angular errors. The minimum norm estimate (MNE) and weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE) exhibited low robustness to sensor noise and calibration errors. Hence, a calibration workflow for accurate sensor parameters, such as the gain and direction of the sensitive axis, before commencing OPM-MEG measurement and a careful choice of different method combinations play crucial roles in ensuring that OPMs yield optimal results for functional connectivity analysis. A thorough framework for analyzing brain connectivity networks was provided herein.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"308 ","pages":"Article 121056"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) systems based on optically pumped magnetometers (OPMs) have rapidly developed in the fields of brain function, health, and disease. Functional connectivity analysis related to the resting-state has gained popularity as a field of research in recent years. Several studies have attempted to use OPM-based MEG (OPM-MEG) for brain network estimation research; however, the choice of source connectivity analysis pipeline may lead to outcome variability. Several methods and related parameters must be selected carefully at each step of the analysis. Therefore, this study assessed the effect of such analytical variability on the OPM-MEG connectivity analysis by conducting simulations. Synthetic MEG data corresponding to two default mode networks (DMN) with six or ten DMN regions were generated using the Gaussian Graphical Spectral (GGS) model. Six intersensor spacings were constructed, and six inverse algorithms and six functional connectivity measures were selected to assess their impact on the network reconstruction accuracy. Three potential sources of error – errors in the sensor gain, crosstalk, and angular errors of the sensitive axis of the OPM – were also assessed. Analytical variability with regard to the tested intersensor spacings, inverse solutions, and functional connectivity measures led to high result variability. Crosstalk exerted a significant impact on the accuracy, which may lead to network reconstruction failure. The accuracy improvement caused by an increase in the sensor density may be reduced by gain and angular errors. The minimum norm estimate (MNE) and weighted minimum norm estimate (wMNE) exhibited low robustness to sensor noise and calibration errors. Hence, a calibration workflow for accurate sensor parameters, such as the gain and direction of the sensitive axis, before commencing OPM-MEG measurement and a careful choice of different method combinations play crucial roles in ensuring that OPMs yield optimal results for functional connectivity analysis. A thorough framework for analyzing brain connectivity networks was provided herein.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroImage
NeuroImage 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
809
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信