Micronutrients adequacy according to six diet quality indices in the "Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra" cohort.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 BUSINESS
Itziar Zazpe, Susana Santiago, María Barbería-Latasa, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga, Miguel Ángel Martínez González
{"title":"Micronutrients adequacy according to six diet quality indices in the \"Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra\" cohort.","authors":"Itziar Zazpe, Susana Santiago, María Barbería-Latasa, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Carmen de la Fuente-Arrillaga, Miguel Ángel Martínez González","doi":"10.20960/nh.05411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>diet quality indices (DQI) tend to relate positively to micronutrient intake. Our aim was to investigate the association between six DQIs and inadequate intake for 19 micronutrients in the SUN (\"Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra\") cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>we assessed 16,768 participants (59.3 % women, 37.8 years for mean age). Diet quality was evaluated using Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH); Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS); Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010); Food-Based Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS); Alternative Mediterranean Diet Score (aMED) and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the probability of failing to meet Estimate Average Requirement (EAR) for either ≥ 3 or ≥ 6 micronutrients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>overall, the lower and higher prevalence of inadequacy in fifth quintiles was for vitamins A, C, B1, B2, B3, B6, for Fe, P and Cr, and for vitamins E and D, respectively. In the multivariable adjusted model, the OR for failing to meet ≥ 3 DRI for the highest versus the lowest quintiles of DASH, MEDAS, AHEI-2010, GDQS, aMED and MDS were: 0.03 (95 % CI, 0.02 to 0.03), 0.06 (95 % CI, 0.05 to 0.07), 0.10 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.12), 0.05 (95 % CI, 0.04 to 0.06), 0.03 (95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.04), and 0.03 (95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.04), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>adherence to six DQIs showed inverse associations with micronutrient inadequacy. Food-based DQIs could be a useful prevention tool. GDQS and MEDAS do not require deriving nutrient intake data, particularly MEDAS, which is even easier and quicker to fill out.</p>","PeriodicalId":19385,"journal":{"name":"Nutricion hospitalaria","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutricion hospitalaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20960/nh.05411","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: diet quality indices (DQI) tend to relate positively to micronutrient intake. Our aim was to investigate the association between six DQIs and inadequate intake for 19 micronutrients in the SUN ("Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra") cohort.

Methods: we assessed 16,768 participants (59.3 % women, 37.8 years for mean age). Diet quality was evaluated using Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH); Mediterranean Diet Adherence Screener (MEDAS); Alternate Healthy Eating Index (AHEI-2010); Food-Based Global Diet Quality Score (GDQS); Alternative Mediterranean Diet Score (aMED) and Mediterranean Diet Score (MDS). Logistic regression analyses were conducted to estimate the probability of failing to meet Estimate Average Requirement (EAR) for either ≥ 3 or ≥ 6 micronutrients.

Results: overall, the lower and higher prevalence of inadequacy in fifth quintiles was for vitamins A, C, B1, B2, B3, B6, for Fe, P and Cr, and for vitamins E and D, respectively. In the multivariable adjusted model, the OR for failing to meet ≥ 3 DRI for the highest versus the lowest quintiles of DASH, MEDAS, AHEI-2010, GDQS, aMED and MDS were: 0.03 (95 % CI, 0.02 to 0.03), 0.06 (95 % CI, 0.05 to 0.07), 0.10 (95 % CI, 0.09 to 0.12), 0.05 (95 % CI, 0.04 to 0.06), 0.03 (95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.04), and 0.03 (95 % CI, 0.03 to 0.04), respectively.

Conclusions: adherence to six DQIs showed inverse associations with micronutrient inadequacy. Food-based DQIs could be a useful prevention tool. GDQS and MEDAS do not require deriving nutrient intake data, particularly MEDAS, which is even easier and quicker to fill out.

根据“Seguimiento university de Navarra”队列的六项饮食质量指标的微量营养素充足率。
目的:膳食质量指数(DQI)与微量营养素摄入量呈正相关。我们的目的是调查SUN(“Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra”)队列中6种dqi与19种微量营养素摄入不足之间的关系。方法:我们评估了16,768名参与者(59.3%为女性,平均年龄37.8岁)。采用Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH)评价饮食质量;地中海饮食依从性筛查;替代健康饮食指数(AHEI-2010);基于食物的全球饮食质量评分(GDQS);地中海饮食评分(aMED)和地中海饮食评分(MDS)。采用Logistic回归分析估计≥3或≥6种微量营养素未达到估计平均需要量(EAR)的概率。结果:总体而言,五分之一人群中维生素A、C、B1、B2、B3、B6、Fe、P和Cr以及维生素E和D的缺乏率分别较低和较高。在多变量调整模型中,DASH、MEDAS、AHEI-2010、GDQS、aMED和MDS最高五分位数与最低五分位数未达到≥3 DRI的OR分别为:0.03 (95% CI, 0.02 ~ 0.03)、0.06 (95% CI, 0.05 ~ 0.07)、0.10 (95% CI, 0.09 ~ 0.12)、0.05 (95% CI, 0.04 ~ 0.06)、0.03 (95% CI, 0.03 ~ 0.04)和0.03 (95% CI, 0.03 ~ 0.04)。结论:坚持六种DQIs与微量营养素缺乏呈负相关。基于食物的DQIs可能是一种有用的预防工具。GDQS和MEDAS不需要获取营养摄入数据,尤其是MEDAS,填写起来更容易、更快捷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutricion hospitalaria
Nutricion hospitalaria 医学-营养学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Nutrición Hospitalaria was born following the SENPE Bulletin (1981-1983) and the SENPE journal (1984-1985). It is the official organ of expression of the Spanish Society of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Throughout its 36 years of existence has been adapting to the rhythms and demands set by the scientific community and the trends of the editorial processes, being its most recent milestone the achievement of Impact Factor (JCR) in 2009. Its content covers the fields of the sciences of nutrition, with special emphasis on nutritional support.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信