Lisu Sung, Hyemin Ku, Yooseok Shin, Salma Swaid, Dohyun Kim, Byoung-Duck Roh
{"title":"Prognosis of Fragment Reattachment in Anterior Crown Fractures: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Lisu Sung, Hyemin Ku, Yooseok Shin, Salma Swaid, Dohyun Kim, Byoung-Duck Roh","doi":"10.1111/jerd.13429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although several studies have compared fragment attachment with resin build-ups in anterior crown fractures, none have specifically investigated the outcome of reattached fragments. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of fragment reattachment in anterior crown fractures and determine the prognostic affecting their success.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of patients who underwent fragment reattachment for crown fractures in anterior teeth (maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors) between 2008 and 2023. All procedures were performed by experienced professors and residents following a standardized protocol. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate fragment retention outcomes and identify potential prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 75 anterior crown fractures, the estimated fragment retention rates were 83.7% at 2 years, 75.2% at 5 years, and 56.4% at 10 years. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified patient age and extent of crown fracture as significant factors affecting outcomes. The 5-year estimated fragment retention rates were 82.8% and 67.0% for uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fragment reattachment remains a viable treatment option for anterior crown fractures. Treatment success decreased with patient age, and complicated crown fractures demonstrated lower retention rates than uncomplicated ones.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>Fragment reattachment can provide predictable outcomes in anterior crown fractures when cases are carefully selected, particularly considering the patient's age and the type of crown fracture.</p>","PeriodicalId":15988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Although several studies have compared fragment attachment with resin build-ups in anterior crown fractures, none have specifically investigated the outcome of reattached fragments. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate long-term outcomes of fragment reattachment in anterior crown fractures and determine the prognostic affecting their success.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical records of patients who underwent fragment reattachment for crown fractures in anterior teeth (maxillary and mandibular central and lateral incisors) between 2008 and 2023. All procedures were performed by experienced professors and residents following a standardized protocol. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to evaluate fragment retention outcomes and identify potential prognostic factors.
Results: Among 75 anterior crown fractures, the estimated fragment retention rates were 83.7% at 2 years, 75.2% at 5 years, and 56.4% at 10 years. Multivariate Cox regression analyses identified patient age and extent of crown fracture as significant factors affecting outcomes. The 5-year estimated fragment retention rates were 82.8% and 67.0% for uncomplicated and complicated crown fractures, respectively.
Conclusions: Fragment reattachment remains a viable treatment option for anterior crown fractures. Treatment success decreased with patient age, and complicated crown fractures demonstrated lower retention rates than uncomplicated ones.
Clinical significance: Fragment reattachment can provide predictable outcomes in anterior crown fractures when cases are carefully selected, particularly considering the patient's age and the type of crown fracture.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry (JERD) is the longest standing peer-reviewed journal devoted solely to advancing the knowledge and practice of esthetic dentistry. Its goal is to provide the very latest evidence-based information in the realm of contemporary interdisciplinary esthetic dentistry through high quality clinical papers, sound research reports and educational features.
The range of topics covered in the journal includes:
- Interdisciplinary esthetic concepts
- Implants
- Conservative adhesive restorations
- Tooth Whitening
- Prosthodontic materials and techniques
- Dental materials
- Orthodontic, periodontal and endodontic esthetics
- Esthetics related research
- Innovations in esthetics