Enhancing laboratory test consistency through linear transformation: A multi-center study

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Shitong Cheng , Dongliang Man , Zhiwei Zhou , Hui Kang
{"title":"Enhancing laboratory test consistency through linear transformation: A multi-center study","authors":"Shitong Cheng ,&nbsp;Dongliang Man ,&nbsp;Zhiwei Zhou ,&nbsp;Hui Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>China is promoting the mutual recognition of clinical laboratory test results to reduce redundant testing, provide more convenient medical services, and lower economic burdens. This study aimed to enhance the consistency of test results across laboratories using a linear transformation method, focusing on five representative biochemical parameters: ALP, CA, TBIL, TC, and TG.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Five ISO 15189 accredited laboratories participated in this study. We established inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory conversion relationships using patient sample comparisons and daily quality control (QC) data. These relationships were used to develop a web-based tool enabling real-time conversion and mutual recognition of laboratory test results.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The study found that the linear transformation method effectively improved the consistency of test results. After three stages of conversion, most test results showed deviations within ±1/2 TEa when compared to a reference laboratory. However, some parameters in the low-value range exhibited less significant conversion effects, likely due to the sensitivity of percentage deviation measurements in this range.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The developed approach and web-based tool show potential for enhancing result consistency and facilitating mutual recognition across laboratories. Despite its effectiveness, the study's limitations, such as a small sample size and a narrow focus on five biochemical parameters, indicate the need for further research and broader application.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":"44 ","pages":"Article e00445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786656/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255172400091X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

China is promoting the mutual recognition of clinical laboratory test results to reduce redundant testing, provide more convenient medical services, and lower economic burdens. This study aimed to enhance the consistency of test results across laboratories using a linear transformation method, focusing on five representative biochemical parameters: ALP, CA, TBIL, TC, and TG.

Methods

Five ISO 15189 accredited laboratories participated in this study. We established inter-laboratory and intra-laboratory conversion relationships using patient sample comparisons and daily quality control (QC) data. These relationships were used to develop a web-based tool enabling real-time conversion and mutual recognition of laboratory test results.

Results

The study found that the linear transformation method effectively improved the consistency of test results. After three stages of conversion, most test results showed deviations within ±1/2 TEa when compared to a reference laboratory. However, some parameters in the low-value range exhibited less significant conversion effects, likely due to the sensitivity of percentage deviation measurements in this range.

Conclusions

The developed approach and web-based tool show potential for enhancing result consistency and facilitating mutual recognition across laboratories. Despite its effectiveness, the study's limitations, such as a small sample size and a narrow focus on five biochemical parameters, indicate the need for further research and broader application.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信