Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop, 3D-integrated circular PFA catheter (Varipulse™): initial single-center experience with the first 35 patients.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
M Borlich, S Groschke, J Wietgrefe, F Witt, A Paulssen, S Fichtlscherer, A Elsässer, H Nef, L Iden
{"title":"Near-zero fluoroscopy workflow for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation using a variable loop, 3D-integrated circular PFA catheter (Varipulse™): initial single-center experience with the first 35 patients.","authors":"M Borlich, S Groschke, J Wietgrefe, F Witt, A Paulssen, S Fichtlscherer, A Elsässer, H Nef, L Iden","doi":"10.1007/s10840-025-01981-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catheter ablation is a standard atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, traditionally using radiofrequency (RF) or cryoablation, which carries the risk of damaging nearby structures. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers partly tissue-selective energy application with minimal collateral damage. This study evaluated a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow with the novel VARIPULSE™ catheter, combining advanced mapping for optimized PFA delivery and reduced radiation. Here, we investigate the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of this approach in the first 35 patients treated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the procedural characteristics, safety, and acute efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ PFA catheter in patients with AF, while specifically evaluating a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow to minimize radiation exposure during the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ PFA catheter. Procedures were conducted under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Key procedural endpoints included acute pulmonary vein isolation, total procedure time, left atrial (LA) dwell time, fluoroscopy time and dose, and safety outcomes, with a focus on assessing the feasibility of a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty patients underwent near-zero fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation using the novel VARIPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation catheter. Patients had a median age of 70 years and typical cardiovascular comorbidities, with 54% presenting with paroxysmal AF. Thirty-three of 35 patients (94%) had a normal left ventricular systolic function (> 60%). The median CHA<sub>2</sub>DS<sub>2</sub>-VA score was 2 (IQR 1-3.75). Sinus rhythm was observed in 66% of cases at procedure start. Median fluoroscopy time was 0.8 min, total median procedure time 53 min, median LA dwell time 38 min, and median fluoroscopy dose 20.4 µGym<sup>2</sup>. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of cases without radiofrequency touch-up. No major complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The VARIPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation system enables an efficient, nearly fluoroscopy-free atrial fibrillation ablation with a simple, easily integrable workflow in the electrophysiology lab. Complete pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all cases without radiofrequency touch-ups, and the procedure was safe with no major complications. This demonstrates the potential for widespread adoption of this technology and workflow.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"877-884"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-025-01981-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation is a standard atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, traditionally using radiofrequency (RF) or cryoablation, which carries the risk of damaging nearby structures. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) offers partly tissue-selective energy application with minimal collateral damage. This study evaluated a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow with the novel VARIPULSE™ catheter, combining advanced mapping for optimized PFA delivery and reduced radiation. Here, we investigate the safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of this approach in the first 35 patients treated.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the procedural characteristics, safety, and acute efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ PFA catheter in patients with AF, while specifically evaluating a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow to minimize radiation exposure during the procedure.

Methods: Thirty-five consecutive patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the VARIPULSE™ PFA catheter. Procedures were conducted under general anesthesia or deep sedation. Key procedural endpoints included acute pulmonary vein isolation, total procedure time, left atrial (LA) dwell time, fluoroscopy time and dose, and safety outcomes, with a focus on assessing the feasibility of a near-zero fluoroscopy workflow.

Results: Thirty patients underwent near-zero fluoroscopy atrial fibrillation ablation using the novel VARIPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation catheter. Patients had a median age of 70 years and typical cardiovascular comorbidities, with 54% presenting with paroxysmal AF. Thirty-three of 35 patients (94%) had a normal left ventricular systolic function (> 60%). The median CHA2DS2-VA score was 2 (IQR 1-3.75). Sinus rhythm was observed in 66% of cases at procedure start. Median fluoroscopy time was 0.8 min, total median procedure time 53 min, median LA dwell time 38 min, and median fluoroscopy dose 20.4 µGym2. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 100% of cases without radiofrequency touch-up. No major complications occurred.

Conclusion: The VARIPULSE™ Pulsed Field Ablation system enables an efficient, nearly fluoroscopy-free atrial fibrillation ablation with a simple, easily integrable workflow in the electrophysiology lab. Complete pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all cases without radiofrequency touch-ups, and the procedure was safe with no major complications. This demonstrates the potential for widespread adoption of this technology and workflow.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

使用可变环3d集成圆形PFA导管(Varipulse™)进行房颤肺静脉隔离的近零透视工作流程:首批35例患者的初始单中心体验。
背景:导管消融是标准的房颤(AF)治疗方法,传统上使用射频(RF)或冷冻消融,这有损伤附近结构的风险。脉冲场消融(PFA)提供部分组织选择性能量应用,附带损伤最小。本研究评估了新型VARIPULSE™导管的近零透视工作流程,结合了优化PFA输送和减少辐射的先进制图。在这里,我们研究了该方法在前35例治疗患者中的安全性、效率和有效性。目的:本研究旨在评估使用VARIPULSE™PFA导管在房颤患者中进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)的手术特点、安全性和急性疗效,同时特别评估接近零的透视工作流程,以最大限度地减少手术过程中的辐射暴露。方法:连续35例阵发性或持续性房颤患者使用VARIPULSE™PFA导管进行肺静脉隔离(PVI)。手术在全身麻醉或深度镇静下进行。关键的手术终点包括急性肺静脉隔离、总手术时间、左房(LA)停留时间、透视时间和剂量以及安全性结果,重点是评估近零透视工作流程的可行性。结果:30例患者使用新型的VARIPULSE™脉冲场消融导管进行了近零的房颤透视消融。患者的中位年龄为70岁,有典型的心血管合并症,54%的患者表现为阵发性房颤。35例患者中有33例(94%)左心室收缩功能正常(60%)。CHA2DS2-VA评分中位数为2 (IQR 1-3.75)。66%的病例在手术开始时观察到窦性心律。中位透视时间为0.8分钟,总中位手术时间为53分钟,中位LA停留时间为38分钟,中位透视剂量为20.4µGym2。在没有射频补片的情况下,100%的病例实现了肺静脉隔离。无重大并发症发生。结论:VARIPULSE™脉冲场消融系统在电生理实验室中具有简单,易于集成的工作流程,可实现高效,几乎无需透视的房颤消融。在没有射频补片的情况下,所有病例都实现了完全的肺静脉隔离,手术是安全的,没有重大并发症。这表明了广泛采用该技术和工作流的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
320
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信