Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with concomitant intracranial hemorrhage

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mohamed Elfil , Lilian Maria Godeiro Coelho , Haneen Sabet , Ahmed Bayoumi , Abdallah Abbas , Tiffany Eatz , Mohammad Aladawi , Zaid Najdawi , Priya Nidamanuri , Sidra Saleem , Lisa Surowiec , Amer Malik
{"title":"Endovascular thrombectomy for large vessel occlusion in acute ischemic stroke patients with concomitant intracranial hemorrhage","authors":"Mohamed Elfil ,&nbsp;Lilian Maria Godeiro Coelho ,&nbsp;Haneen Sabet ,&nbsp;Ahmed Bayoumi ,&nbsp;Abdallah Abbas ,&nbsp;Tiffany Eatz ,&nbsp;Mohammad Aladawi ,&nbsp;Zaid Najdawi ,&nbsp;Priya Nidamanuri ,&nbsp;Sidra Saleem ,&nbsp;Lisa Surowiec ,&nbsp;Amer Malik","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the gold standard for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, concomitant intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) might render AIS-LVO patients ineligible for EVT in real-life practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To provide robust evidence regarding the outcomes of EVT in AIS-LVO patients with concomitant ICH.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data analysis was performed using OpenMetaAnalyst software. We assessed the pooled incidence rate with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) for qualitative data and analyzed the pooled mean difference (MD) with a 95 % CI for continuous data. The pooled effect size for all outcomes was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Six studies were included in the <em>meta</em>-analysis. The overall incidence rate of successful revascularization was 85.3 % (95 % CI: 75.8 %-94.7 %), with rates of 76.1 % for ipsilateral hemorrhages and 66.1 % for contralateral hemorrhages. Functional independence was achieved in 20 % of patients (95 % CI: 4.8 %-36.8 %), with rates of 23 % for ipsilateral and 27.7 % for contralateral hemorrhages. Mortality was reported at 52 % (95 % CI: 34.9 %-69 %), with a higher rate of 52.6 % for ipsilateral hemorrhages compared to 36.8 % for contralateral hemorrhages.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This <em>meta</em>-analysis indicates that EVT is feasible in AIS patients with concurrent ICH, yet it is associated with poor functional outcomes and high mortality rates. Careful patient selection is essential to optimize the outcomes, and further research is needed to enhance outcomes for these high-risk patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 111093"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967586825000657","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the gold standard for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, concomitant intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) might render AIS-LVO patients ineligible for EVT in real-life practice.

Objective

To provide robust evidence regarding the outcomes of EVT in AIS-LVO patients with concomitant ICH.

Methods

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data analysis was performed using OpenMetaAnalyst software. We assessed the pooled incidence rate with a 95 % confidence interval (CI) for qualitative data and analyzed the pooled mean difference (MD) with a 95 % CI for continuous data. The pooled effect size for all outcomes was calculated using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model.

Results

Six studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall incidence rate of successful revascularization was 85.3 % (95 % CI: 75.8 %-94.7 %), with rates of 76.1 % for ipsilateral hemorrhages and 66.1 % for contralateral hemorrhages. Functional independence was achieved in 20 % of patients (95 % CI: 4.8 %-36.8 %), with rates of 23 % for ipsilateral and 27.7 % for contralateral hemorrhages. Mortality was reported at 52 % (95 % CI: 34.9 %-69 %), with a higher rate of 52.6 % for ipsilateral hemorrhages compared to 36.8 % for contralateral hemorrhages.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis indicates that EVT is feasible in AIS patients with concurrent ICH, yet it is associated with poor functional outcomes and high mortality rates. Careful patient selection is essential to optimize the outcomes, and further research is needed to enhance outcomes for these high-risk patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信