{"title":"First Series of Living Donor Liver Retransplants From India: Challenges and Outcomes","authors":"Shaleen Agarwal , Rajesh Dey , Sanjiv Saigal , Phani K. Nekarakanti , Subash Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.jceh.2024.102454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is a paucity of Indian data on long-term survival after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) or the need for retransplant (re-LT). In this article, we report the first series of retransplants from India with focus on indications, technical challenges and results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective study on 29 patients undergoing a liver retransplant (re-LT) was analysed with respect to survival outcomes and postoperative complications. Patients were divided into early and late retransplant groups based on whether re-LT was performed within or beyond 30 days of primary transplant.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Liver retransplant was performed in 29 (0.81%) patients out of a total of 3563 liver transplants (28 living donor and one deceased donor liver transplant). The primary transplant was an LDLT in 27 (93%) patients. Retransplant was performed at a median of 26 days after the first transplant. Re-LT was performed early (within 30 days) in 17 (59%) patients and late (beyond 30 days) in 12 (41%). Hepatic artery thrombosis (53%) and early graft dysfunction (47%) were the indications for early retransplant, while biliary complications (50%) and chronic rejection (33%) were primary indications for late retransplant. Postretransplant complications occurred in 22 (75%) patients, the commonest being gram-negative bacterial sepsis. The 30-day mortality after retransplant was 27% (8/29). The primary cause of mortality was gram-negative septicaemia. The mortality in the late retransplant group (2, 16.6%) was lower than in the early retransplant group (6, 35%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Retransplant using living donors is a viable option in properly selected patients with prior LDLT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15479,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","volume":"15 2","pages":"Article 102454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973688324011216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is a paucity of Indian data on long-term survival after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) or the need for retransplant (re-LT). In this article, we report the first series of retransplants from India with focus on indications, technical challenges and results.
Methods
A retrospective study on 29 patients undergoing a liver retransplant (re-LT) was analysed with respect to survival outcomes and postoperative complications. Patients were divided into early and late retransplant groups based on whether re-LT was performed within or beyond 30 days of primary transplant.
Results
Liver retransplant was performed in 29 (0.81%) patients out of a total of 3563 liver transplants (28 living donor and one deceased donor liver transplant). The primary transplant was an LDLT in 27 (93%) patients. Retransplant was performed at a median of 26 days after the first transplant. Re-LT was performed early (within 30 days) in 17 (59%) patients and late (beyond 30 days) in 12 (41%). Hepatic artery thrombosis (53%) and early graft dysfunction (47%) were the indications for early retransplant, while biliary complications (50%) and chronic rejection (33%) were primary indications for late retransplant. Postretransplant complications occurred in 22 (75%) patients, the commonest being gram-negative bacterial sepsis. The 30-day mortality after retransplant was 27% (8/29). The primary cause of mortality was gram-negative septicaemia. The mortality in the late retransplant group (2, 16.6%) was lower than in the early retransplant group (6, 35%).
Conclusion
Retransplant using living donors is a viable option in properly selected patients with prior LDLT.