Key factors for a national dental implant registry

IF 4.8 2区医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE

Journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105603

Trine Lise Lundekvam Berge , Gunvor Bentung Lygre , Bjørn Kubon , Stein Atle Lie

{"title":"Key factors for a national dental implant registry","authors":"Trine Lise Lundekvam Berge , Gunvor Bentung Lygre , Bjørn Kubon , Stein Atle Lie","doi":"10.1016/j.jdent.2025.105603","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>This study aimed to identify essential factors for establishing a national dental implant registry.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Following a literature review to identify existing national dental implant registries, discussions were carried out with Norwegian medical registry stakeholders. To evaluate methods for collecting data, a pilot study, performing prospective registration of dental implants inserted or removed in five dental clinics during a period of two years, was conducted.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Few national dental implant registries were identified. In the pilot study, 1,326 dental implants placed in 781 patients were registered. One year after insertion, the estimated failure was 2.9 % (95% CI: 2.0–4.1). Based on collaboration with clinicians, the dataset was revised to enhance the accuracy of details of implant placement. Registry procedures were structured for easy integration with electronic patient records, focusing on patient details, planned prosthetic restoration, surgical procedures, and dates for implant placement or loss</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>When establishing a national dental implant register, interaction with clinicians, efficient data collection, regulatory compliance, and resources to maintain the registry are essential. Prioritizing relevant and adequate variables based on a \"need-to-know\" principle is crucial.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>A national dental implant registry could enable generalization of findings and provide comprehensive success rates across diverse patient groups and clinical settings. This study contributes insights on establishing a national dental implant registry to improve the quality of implants used in clinical practice</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dentistry","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 105603"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300571225000491","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to identify essential factors for establishing a national dental implant registry.

Methods

Following a literature review to identify existing national dental implant registries, discussions were carried out with Norwegian medical registry stakeholders. To evaluate methods for collecting data, a pilot study, performing prospective registration of dental implants inserted or removed in five dental clinics during a period of two years, was conducted.

Results

Few national dental implant registries were identified. In the pilot study, 1,326 dental implants placed in 781 patients were registered. One year after insertion, the estimated failure was 2.9 % (95% CI: 2.0–4.1). Based on collaboration with clinicians, the dataset was revised to enhance the accuracy of details of implant placement. Registry procedures were structured for easy integration with electronic patient records, focusing on patient details, planned prosthetic restoration, surgical procedures, and dates for implant placement or loss

Conclusions

When establishing a national dental implant register, interaction with clinicians, efficient data collection, regulatory compliance, and resources to maintain the registry are essential. Prioritizing relevant and adequate variables based on a "need-to-know" principle is crucial.

Clinical relevance

A national dental implant registry could enable generalization of findings and provide comprehensive success rates across diverse patient groups and clinical settings. This study contributes insights on establishing a national dental implant registry to improve the quality of implants used in clinical practice

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科

CiteScore

7.30

自引率

11.40%

发文量

349

审稿时长

35 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Dentistry has an open access mirror journal The Journal of Dentistry: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The Journal of Dentistry is the leading international dental journal within the field of Restorative Dentistry. Placing an emphasis on publishing novel and high-quality research papers, the Journal aims to influence the practice of dentistry at clinician, research, industry and policy-maker level on an international basis. Topics covered include the management of dental disease, periodontology, endodontology, operative dentistry, fixed and removable prosthodontics, dental biomaterials science, long-term clinical trials including epidemiology and oral health, technology transfer of new scientific instrumentation or procedures, as well as clinically relevant oral biology and translational research. The Journal of Dentistry will publish original scientific research papers including short communications. It is also interested in publishing review articles and leaders in themed areas which will be linked to new scientific research. Conference proceedings are also welcome and expressions of interest should be communicated to the Editor.