The effect of older age on outcomes of rTMS treatment for treatment-resistant depression.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Michael K Leuchter, Cole Citrenbaum, Andrew C Wilson, Tristan D Tibbe, Nicholas J Jackson, David E Krantz, Scott A Wilke, Juliana Corlier, Thomas B Strouse, Gil D Hoftman, Reza Tadayonnejad, Ralph J Koek, Aaron R Slan, Nathaniel D Ginder, Margaret G Distler, Hewa Artin, John H Lee, Adesewa E Adelekun, Evan H Einstein, Hanadi A Oughli, Andrew F Leuchter
{"title":"The effect of older age on outcomes of rTMS treatment for treatment-resistant depression.","authors":"Michael K Leuchter, Cole Citrenbaum, Andrew C Wilson, Tristan D Tibbe, Nicholas J Jackson, David E Krantz, Scott A Wilke, Juliana Corlier, Thomas B Strouse, Gil D Hoftman, Reza Tadayonnejad, Ralph J Koek, Aaron R Slan, Nathaniel D Ginder, Margaret G Distler, Hewa Artin, John H Lee, Adesewa E Adelekun, Evan H Einstein, Hanadi A Oughli, Andrew F Leuchter","doi":"10.1017/S1041610224000462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clinical outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) vary widely and there is no mood rating scale that is standard for assessing rTMS outcome. It remains unclear whether TMS is as efficacious in older adults with late-life depression (LLD) compared to younger adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study examined the effect of age on outcomes of rTMS treatment of adults with TRD. Self-report and observer mood ratings were measured weekly in 687 subjects ages 16-100 years undergoing rTMS treatment using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology 30-item Self-Report (IDS-SR), Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ), Profile of Mood States 30-item, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS). All rating scales detected significant improvement with treatment; response and remission rates varied by scale but not by age (response/remission ≥ 60: 38%-57%/25%-33%; <60: 32%-49%/18%-25%). Proportional hazards models showed early improvement predicted later improvement across ages, though early improvements in PHQ and HDRS were more predictive of remission in those < 60 years (relative to those ≥ 60) and greater baseline IDS burden was more predictive of non-remission in those ≥ 60 years (relative to those < 60). These results indicate there is no significant effect of age on treatment outcomes in rTMS for TRD, though rating instruments may differ in assessment of symptom burden between younger and older adults during treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14368,"journal":{"name":"International psychogeriatrics","volume":"36 11","pages":"1070-1075"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1041610224000462","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical outcomes of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) vary widely and there is no mood rating scale that is standard for assessing rTMS outcome. It remains unclear whether TMS is as efficacious in older adults with late-life depression (LLD) compared to younger adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). This study examined the effect of age on outcomes of rTMS treatment of adults with TRD. Self-report and observer mood ratings were measured weekly in 687 subjects ages 16-100 years undergoing rTMS treatment using the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology 30-item Self-Report (IDS-SR), Patient Health Questionnaire 9-item (PHQ), Profile of Mood States 30-item, and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS). All rating scales detected significant improvement with treatment; response and remission rates varied by scale but not by age (response/remission ≥ 60: 38%-57%/25%-33%; <60: 32%-49%/18%-25%). Proportional hazards models showed early improvement predicted later improvement across ages, though early improvements in PHQ and HDRS were more predictive of remission in those < 60 years (relative to those ≥ 60) and greater baseline IDS burden was more predictive of non-remission in those ≥ 60 years (relative to those < 60). These results indicate there is no significant effect of age on treatment outcomes in rTMS for TRD, though rating instruments may differ in assessment of symptom burden between younger and older adults during treatment.

年龄对rTMS治疗难治性抑郁症疗效的影响。
重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)治疗难治性抑郁症(TRD)的临床结果差异很大,目前还没有评估rTMS结果的标准情绪评定量表。目前尚不清楚经颅磁刺激对老年抑郁症(LLD)患者是否与年轻重度抑郁症(MDD)患者一样有效。本研究考察了年龄对成年TRD患者rTMS治疗结果的影响。采用抑郁症状量表30项自我报告(IDS-SR)、患者健康问卷9项(PHQ)、情绪状态量表30项和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表17项(HDRS),对687名接受rTMS治疗的16-100岁受试者的自我报告和观察者情绪评分进行每周一次的测量。所有量表均检测到治疗后的显著改善;缓解率和缓解率因量表而异,但不因年龄而异(缓解/缓解≥60:38%-57%/25%-33%;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International psychogeriatrics
International psychogeriatrics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
8.60%
发文量
217
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: A highly respected, multidisciplinary journal, International Psychogeriatrics publishes high quality original research papers in the field of psychogeriatrics. The journal aims to be the leading peer reviewed journal dealing with all aspects of the mental health of older people throughout the world. Circulated to over 1,000 members of the International Psychogeriatric Association, International Psychogeriatrics also features important editorials, provocative debates, literature reviews, book reviews and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信