Electroplated double-crowns on implants and teeth after up to 12 years- a retrospective clinical study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Christoph Mautsch, Jan Klenke, Thomas Kern, Stefan Wolfart, Jaana-Sophia Kern
{"title":"Electroplated double-crowns on implants and teeth after up to 12 years- a retrospective clinical study.","authors":"Christoph Mautsch, Jan Klenke, Thomas Kern, Stefan Wolfart, Jaana-Sophia Kern","doi":"10.1186/s40729-025-00594-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To retrospectively evaluate the outcome of implant-supported or combined tooth-implant-supported prostheses retained by electroplated double-crowns after 1-12 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-five patients were retrospectively examined in a private dental practice in Hamburg, Germany. All had been rehabilitated with a removable prosthesis retained by electroplated double-crowns, for at least one year. Fifteen patients had implant-supported prostheses and 10 had combined tooth-implant-supported prostheses in the maxilla or the mandible. Biological and technical complications were recorded at the clinical examination and extracted from the patient records. Kaplan-Meier implant and tooth survival rates were calculated. Potential risk factors for severe complications were identified. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured by a short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire. Patients reported subjective chewing function using a visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 100% for natural abutments and 90.9% for implants after 11.8 years (p = 0.54). Two implants in two patients were lost at 8 and 9 years due to peri-implantitis in the \"solely implant\" group. The most common complications were decementation of primary crowns and wear of the prosthetic teeth. The mean OHIP score for the group \"tooth-implant-supported\" was 5.2 ± 5.0, whereas the mean score for the \"solely implant\" group was 1.7 ± 2.9 (p = 0.039). Patients rated their subjective masticatory function very high with an average score of 9.4 ± 0.8 out of a possible 10.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implant-supported or combined tooth-implant-supported prostheses retained by electroplated double-crowns are a viable method of treatment with a satisfactory outcome. Maintenance has been manageable and patients have reported very good subjective chewing function after several years of function.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"11 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-025-00594-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively evaluate the outcome of implant-supported or combined tooth-implant-supported prostheses retained by electroplated double-crowns after 1-12 years.

Methods: Twenty-five patients were retrospectively examined in a private dental practice in Hamburg, Germany. All had been rehabilitated with a removable prosthesis retained by electroplated double-crowns, for at least one year. Fifteen patients had implant-supported prostheses and 10 had combined tooth-implant-supported prostheses in the maxilla or the mandible. Biological and technical complications were recorded at the clinical examination and extracted from the patient records. Kaplan-Meier implant and tooth survival rates were calculated. Potential risk factors for severe complications were identified. Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured by a short version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) questionnaire. Patients reported subjective chewing function using a visual analogue scale.

Results: Kaplan-Meier survival rates were 100% for natural abutments and 90.9% for implants after 11.8 years (p = 0.54). Two implants in two patients were lost at 8 and 9 years due to peri-implantitis in the "solely implant" group. The most common complications were decementation of primary crowns and wear of the prosthetic teeth. The mean OHIP score for the group "tooth-implant-supported" was 5.2 ± 5.0, whereas the mean score for the "solely implant" group was 1.7 ± 2.9 (p = 0.039). Patients rated their subjective masticatory function very high with an average score of 9.4 ± 0.8 out of a possible 10.

Conclusions: Implant-supported or combined tooth-implant-supported prostheses retained by electroplated double-crowns are a viable method of treatment with a satisfactory outcome. Maintenance has been manageable and patients have reported very good subjective chewing function after several years of function.

在植入体和牙齿上电镀双冠长达12年后的回顾性临床研究。
目的:回顾性评价电镀双冠保留种植体或种植体-种植体联合种植体修复体1-12年的疗效。方法:对德国汉堡一家私人牙科诊所的25例患者进行回顾性检查。所有患者均采用可移动假体进行修复,假体由电镀双冠保留至少一年。15例患者采用种植体支撑修复体,10例患者在上颌骨或下颌骨采用牙-种植体联合修复体。在临床检查时记录生物和技术并发症,并从患者记录中提取。计算Kaplan-Meier种植体和牙齿存活率。确定了严重并发症的潜在危险因素。口腔健康相关生活质量(OHRQoL)通过简短版的口腔健康影响概况(OHIP)问卷进行测量。患者使用视觉模拟量表报告主观咀嚼功能。结果:11.8年后,天然基牙的Kaplan-Meier存活率为100%,种植体的Kaplan-Meier存活率为90.9% (p = 0.54)。单纯种植组有2例患者在8年和9年因种植体周围炎丢失两个种植体。最常见的并发症是初级冠的退化和假牙的磨损。种植牙支持组OHIP平均评分为5.2±5.0分,单纯种植组平均评分为1.7±2.9分(p = 0.039)。患者认为自己的主观咀嚼功能非常高,平均得分为9.4±0.8分(满分为10分)。结论:电镀双冠保留种植体或种植体-种植体联合种植体修复是一种可行的治疗方法,效果满意。维持是可管理的,患者在几年后报告了非常好的主观咀嚼功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信